디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권5호
  • /
  • Pages.261-268
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

관광목적지의 자원매력, 오락적 체험, 러브마크, 애착 간의 구조적 관계

A study on the structural relationship between resource attraction, entertainment experience, love mark and attachment in tourist destination

  • 서경도 (광주대학교 호텔외식조리학과) ;
  • 이정은 (예원예술대학교 문화예술관광콘텐츠학과)
  • Seo, Gyeong-Do (Dept. of Hotel food service culinary arts, Gwangju University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Eun (Dept of Culture & art tourism contents, Yewon Arts University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.20
  • 심사 : 2022.05.20
  • 발행 : 2022.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 관광목적지의 자원매력, 오락적 체험, 러브마크, 애착간의 인과관계를 파악하여 그 의미를 파악하고자 하였다. 제시한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 각각의 연구개념에 대해 이론연구를 하였다. 이를 바탕으로 설문지를 도출 후 실증연구를 실시하였으며 인구비례표본출로 전국단위로 비대면 조사를 실시하였다. 실증연구는 통계프로그램인 SPSS25.0과 AMOS25.0를 통해 확인하였다. 이론연구와 실증연구로 나타난 연구결과의 의미는 다음과 같다. 관광목적지의 자원매력은 관광객의 체험간 영향 관계는 정(+)의 관계를 맺고 있었다. 체험과 러브마크와의 영향 관계는 정(+)의 관계를 형성하고 있었다. 체험과 애착 간의 관계에서도 정(+)의 관계를 형성하고 있었다. 그러나 러브마크와 애착 간 관계는 유의한 관계를 형성하지 않고 있었다. 관광목적지의 자원매력, 오락적 체험, 러브마크, 애착 간에 긍정적이며 유의한 관계를 형성하기 위해선 지역적 특성이 그대로 투영된 만큼 지역적 정서, 의미, 그 외 많은 그것이 함께하고 있다. 관광자원으로서 새로운 자원의 관광행동을 위한 목적도 있지만, 지역적 색(色)을 반영하고 있으므로 지역문화, 역사 유용한 자료이기에 보호, 보존 및 적극적인 프로그램 개발이 요구된다. 설문조사의 인구통계적 특성을 기준으로 표본으로 전국단위로 연구가 되었으나 연차적인 조사로 관광객 특성의 변화가 요구된다.

This study tried to understand the meaning of resource attraction, entertainment experience, love mark, and attachment of tourist destinations. A theoretical study was conducted on each research concept to achieve the proposed research purpose. Based on this, an empirical study was conducted after deriving a questionnaire based on this, and a non-face-to-face survey was conducted nationwide using population-proportional sampling. The empirical study was confirmed through the statistical programs SPSS25.0 and AMOS25.0. The resource attractiveness of the tourist destination had a positive (+) relationship with the influence on the tourists' experience. The relationship between the experience and the love mark had a positive (+) relationship. A positive (+) relationship was also formed in the relationship between experience and attachment. However, the relationship between love mark and attachment did not form a significant relationship.Because it reflects regional characteristics, it is a useful material for local culture and history, so protection, preservation, and active program development are required. is needed.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by Gwangju University Research Grant in 2022.

참고문헌

  1. J. E. Lee & B. C. Chol (2018). A study of the influence of Tourism Storytelling on love-mark, Relationship Quality, Tourist Behavior of Tourist Destinations. International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences, 33(2), 141-163. DOI: 10.21719/IJTMS.33.2.8
  2. E. J. Mayo, & L. P. Jarvis (1981). The psychology of leisure travel: Effective marketing and selling of travel services. Boston. MA: CBI Publishing Company, Inc ISBN: 0843622040
  3. Y. Hu & J. R. Ritchie (1993). Measuring Destination Attractiveness: A Contextual Approach, Journal of Travel Research, 32(2), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303200204
  4. S. Formica & M. Uysal, (2006). Destination Attractiveness Based on Supply and Demand Evaluations: An Analytic Framework, Journal of Travel Research, 44(1), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287506286714
  5. E. J. Mayo & L. P. Jarvis. (1981). The psychology of leisure travel: Effective marketing and selling of travel services, Boston. MA: CBI Publishing Company, Inc. ISBN : 0843622040
  6. Y. Hu & J. R. Ritchie, (1993). Measuring Destination Attractiveness: A Contextual Approach. Journal of Travel Research, 32(2), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303200204
  7. L. Dwyer, R. Mellor, Z. Livaic, D. Edwards & C. KIm (2004). Attributes of Destination Competitiveness: A Factor Analysis. Tourism Analysis, 9(1-2), 91-101 https://doi.org/10.3727/1083542041437558.
  8. B. H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello. (2013). Consumer experience and experiential marketing: A critical review. Review of marketing Research, 10, 25-61. ISBN: 978-1-78190-760-3 https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2013)0000010006
  9. B. H. Schmitt (1999). Experiential Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496
  10. K. Roberts (2004). Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands. Power House Books.
  11. J. Pawle & C. Peter (2006). Measuring Emotion-Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands, Journal of Advertising Research, 46(1), 38-48. DOI: 10.2501/S0021849906060053 Published 1 March 2006
  12. S. H. Lee (2016). Relationships among experiential value, lovemarks, and brand loyalty of restaurant customers. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(11), 63-77. DOI : 10.21298/IJTHR.2016.11.30.11.63
  13. M. V. Guiliani & R. Feldman. (1993). Place attachment in a development and cultural contexts, Journal of Marketing Environmental Psychology, 13, 267-274. ISBN: 0 306 44071 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80179-3
  14. A. Yuksel, F. Yuksel & Y. Bilim (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism management, 31(2), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.007
  15. G. J. Walker & R. Chapman (2003). Thinking Like a Park: The Effects of Sense of Place, Perspective:Taking, and Empathy on Pro-Environmental Intentions. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 21(4), 71-89. ISSN: 0735-1968
  16. J. H. Yoon. (2008). The relationship among tourism attractiveness, satisfaction and intention revisit in Japan, The Japanese Modern Association of Korea, 21,208-301 DOI : 10.16979/jmak..21.200808.283
  17. D. H. Ha. (2012). The Effects of Tourist Destination Experiences on Enjoyment: Focused on a Moderating Role of Service Quality, Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers, 22(3), 127-138. DOI : 10.35149/jakpg.2012.22.3.011
  18. D. D. Zhang & B. Y. Min (2018). Effects of theme park experience on lovemarks and recommendation : Pine and Gilmore's experience economy perspective, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 20(4), 157-170. DOI : 10.31667/jhts.2018.12.77.157
  19. B. J. Pine & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy, Harvard Business Review ,29-36.
  20. H. C. Kang (2013). A Guide on the Use of Factor Analysis in the Assessment of Construct Validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587-594. UCI : G704-000229.2013.43.5.012 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  21. C. H Choi & Y. Y. Yoo (2017). The Study on the comparative analysis of EFA and CFA. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 103-111. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.103
  22. J. E Lee & B. C. Choi (2021). Structural relationship between cultural nostalgia, attitude, involvement and place attachment in modern cultural heritage. International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences, 36(6), 79-98. DOI: DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21719/IJTMS.36.6.
  23. J. E. Lee (2020). Structural Relationship between Cultural Nnostalgia, Cultural Experience, Local Identity and Behavioral Intention of Urban regeneration area.National Research Foundation Part-time Instructor Support Project Result Report.
  24. J. E. Lee (2021). A study on the Causal Relationship between Cultural Nostalgia, Experience, Cultural Memory and Behavioral Intention in Urban Regeneration Areas. Tourism Research, 46(2). 305-331. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002731325