대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어판 부부 만족도 측정도구 및 단축형의 타당도와 신뢰도

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Couple Satisfaction Index

  • 투고 : 2021.08.17
  • 심사 : 2022.03.08
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The study aimed to translate the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI 32) into Korean, to evaluate the reliability and validity of CSI 32 and short-form (CSI 16, 4) in the Korean context, and to determine a cut-off score for Korean couples. Methods: Korean Versions of the Couple Satisfaction Index (K-CSI) 32 was translated, back-translated, and reviewed by five bilingual experts. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with data from a sample of 218 couples (N = 436) to test construct validity. Validity and reliability were evaluated. The receiver's operating characteristics curve analysis was used to obtain the cut-off score. Results: The construct validities of K-CSI 32, 16, and 4 were verified using one-factor structures. The results of CFA showed a slightly better fit for K-CSI 16 and 4 than for K-CSI 32. Convergent validity was supported by significant positive correlations of K-CSI with Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and Family Relationship Assessment Scale. Moreover, the significant differences in K-CSI between normal and depressive group demonstrated known-group validity. Cut-off scores of 105.5 on K-CSI 32, 50.25 on K-CSI 16, and 13.25 on K-CSI 4 were validated to identify distressed couple relationships. Conclusion: For clinical practice, the reliable and valid K-CSI 32 has the potential to measure changes in couple satisfaction after couple therapy or interventions. Applying K-CSI 32 may facilitate research on couple and family relationships in nursing and contribute to the discussion on the role of couple satisfaction in mental health.

키워드

과제정보

We appreciate Dr. Jennie C. De Gagne and Yukyung Choi for helping the translation process.

참고문헌

  1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Family Database [Internet]. Paris: OECD; 2019 [cited 2021 Aug 4]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_3_1_Marriage_and_divorce_rates.pdf.
  2. Sbarra DA, Coan JA. Divorce and health: Good data in need of better theory. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017;13:91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.014
  3. Kim JH. The effect of married couple communication on the satisfaction of marriage: Focusing on the mediating effect of marital intimacy. Korean Family Resource Management Association. 2019;23(4):57-73. https://doi.org/10.22626/jkfrma.2019.23.4.004
  4. Urbano-Contreras A, Iglesias-Garcia MT, Martinez-Gonzalez RA. Development and validation of the Satisfaction in Couple Relationship Scale (SCR). Contemporary Family Therapy. 2017;39(1):54-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9400-z
  5. Whisman MA, Gilmour AL, Salinger JM. Marital satisfaction and mortality in the United States adult population. Health Psychology. 2018;37(11):1041-1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000677
  6. Ward PJ, Lundberg NR, Zabriskie RB, Berrett K. Measuring marital satisfaction: A Comparison of the revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the satisfaction with married life scale. Marriage & Family Review. 2009;45(4):412-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920902828219
  7. Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology. 2007;21(4):572-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
  8. Chung H. A theoretical review for developing a Korean Type Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 2001;39(11):89-106.
  9. Lee KS, Hahn DW. Development of the Marital Adjustment Inventory(MAI). The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2003;8(3):679-705.
  10. Kim JS, Kwon SM. Development of Marital Beliefs Scale. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2009;28(2):459-473. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2009.28.2.008
  11. Kim JS. Development of the Marital Distress Perceptions Scale. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology. 2011;16(2):179-196. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2011.16.2.003
  12. Jang JH. Development and validity of Marital Affection Behavior Scale(MABS). The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology. 2011;16(4):531-553. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2011.16.4.007
  13. Spanier GB. Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1976;38(1):15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
  14. Lee MS, Kim ZS. A preliminary study on the standardization of the Korean Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1996;15(1):129-140.
  15. Schumm WR, Paff-Bergen LA, Hatch RC, Obiorah FC, Copeland JM, Meens LD, et al. Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1986;48(2):381-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/352405
  16. Korea Institute of Child Care and Education. Panel Study on Korean Children (PSKC). [Internet]. Seoul: PSKC; 2018 [cited 2022 Apr 20]. Available from: https://panel.kicce.re.kr/pskc/board/index.do?menu_idx=42&manage_idx=161.
  17. Locke HJ, Wallace KM. Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living. 1959;21(3):251-255. https://doi.org/10.2307/348022
  18. Norton R. Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1983;45(1):141-151. https://doi.org/10.2307/351302
  19. Hendrick SS. A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1988;50(1):93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
  20. Huston TL, Vangelisti AL. Socioemotional behavior and satisfaction in marital relationships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61(5):721-733. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.5.721
  21. Graham JM, Diebels KJ, Barnow ZB. The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology. 2011;25(1):39-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022441
  22. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2016. p. 205-232.
  23. Chonody JM, Gabb J, Killian M, Dunk-West P. Measuring relationship quality in an international study: Exploratory and confirmatory factor validity. Research on Social Work Practice. 2018;28(8):920-930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516631120
  24. Okhotnikov IA, Wood ND. Adaptation of the Couples Satisfaction Index into Russian. Contemporary Family Therapy. 2020;42(2):140-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09517-6
  25. Forouzesh Yekta F, Yaghubi H, Mootabi F, Roshan R, Gholami Fesharaki M, Omidi A. Psychometric characteristics and factor analysis of the Persian version of Couples Satisfaction Index. Avicenna Journal of Neuropsychophysiology. 2017;4(2):49-56. https://doi.org/10.32598/ajnpp.4.2.49
  26. Hughes JA, Gordon KC, Lenger KA, Roberson PNE, Cordova JV. Examining the role of therapeutic alliance and split alliance on couples' relationship satisfaction following a brief couple intervention. Contemporary Family Therapy. 2021;43(4):359-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09609-2
  27. Cha G, Kim SS, Gil M. The effects of stress and marital satisfaction on depression in middle-aged couples: Analysis using an actor-partner interdependence model. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2017;37(2):126-149. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2017.37.2.126
  28. Galovan AM, Holmes EK, Proulx CM. Theoretical and methodological issues in relationship research: Considering the common fate model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2017;34(1):44-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515621179
  29. Joo S, Jun HJ, Chai HY. A longitudinal interaction between Korean elderly couples on marital satisfaction. Family and Culture. 2013;25(4):91-119. https://doi.org/10.21478/family.25.4.201312.004
  30. Jbilou J, Charbonneau A, Sonier RP, Greenman PS, Levesque N, Barriault S, et al. Canadian French translation of the Couples Satisfaction Index: A pre-validation pilot study exploring men's perspective. Research Square. [Preprint]. 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 5]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-799178/v1.
  31. World Health Organization (WHO). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.coursehero.com/file/30372721/WHO-Process-of-translation-and-adaptation-of-instrumentspdf/.
  32. Chung YK. Solution focused therapy for care conflict of newlywed dual earner couple. Korean Journal of Solution-Focused Therapy. 2016;3(1):55-81.
  33. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
  34. Kim DS. A study on the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Korean Home Management Association. 1989;7(2):85-94.
  35. Cano-Prous A, Martin-Lanas R, Moya-Querejeta J, Beunza-Nuin MI, Lahortiga-Ramos F, Garcia-Granero M. Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2014;14(2):137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70047-X
  36. Kim SS, Gil M, Kim-Godwin Y. Development and validation of the Family Relationship Assessment Scale in Korean college students' families. Family Process. 2021;60(2):586-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12559
  37. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1(3):385-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  38. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D(Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1993;32(3):381-399.
  39. Mustanski B, Starks T, Newcomb ME. Methods for the design and analysis of relationship and partner effects on sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014;43(1):21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0215-9
  40. Peterson GW, Bush KR. Handbook of marriage and the family. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Science & Business Media; 2013. p. 278-306.
  41. Kim SS, Gil M. A multilevel analysis of the effect of individual and family personalities on depressive symptoms in families with college students. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2016;36(3):34-52. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2016.36.3.34
  42. Kim SY. Fundamentals and extensions of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2016. p. 41-302.
  43. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2011;19(2):139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  44. Carlson KD, Herdman AO. Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods. 2012;15(1):17-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
  45. Rhee K. Wrong applications with overall model evaluations and its corrections in structural equation modeling. Survey Research. 2016;17(1):71-83. https://doi.org/10.20997/SR.17.1.4
  46. Lamela D, Figueiredo B, Morais A, Matos P, Jongenelen I. Are measures of marital satisfaction valid for women with depressive symptoms? The examination of factor structure and measurement invariance of the Couple Satisfaction Index-4 across depression levels in Portuguese women. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2020;27(2):214-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2420
  47. Doss BD, Roddy MK, Nowlan KM, Rothman K, Christensen A. Maintenance of gains in relationship and individual functioning following the online OurRelationship program. Behavior Therapy. 2019;50(1):73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.011
  48. Xue WL, He HG, Chua YJ, Wang W, Shorey S. Factors influencing first-time fathers' involvement in their wives' pregnancy and childbirth: A correlational study. Midwifery. 2018;62:20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.002
  49. Jimenez-Picon N, Romero-Martin M, Ramirez-Baena L, Palomo-Lara JC, Gomez-Salgado J. Systematic review of the relationship between couple dyadic adjustment and family health. Children. 2021;8(6):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8060491