Journal of Christian Education in Korea (기독교교육논총)

The Korean Society of Christian Religious Education (한국기독교교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the effect of Learning Motivation type on Immersion According to the Non-Face-To-Face Teaching Method in the Major Classes for Preschool Teachers at Christian Universities

기독교 대학의 예비유아교사 전공수업에서 비대면수업 방식에 따라 학습동기 유형이 몰입에 미치는 영향 탐색

  • Received : 2022.03.04
  • Accepted : 2022.03.29
  • Published : 2022.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study verified the effect of learning motivation on immersion by non-face-to-face class method. For this purpose, 101 college students majoring in early childhood education were selected as research subjects. The average age of the study subjects was 22.6 years old, and 51 students took non-real-time non-face-to-face classes, and 50 students took real-time non-face-to-face classes. The study measured the level of immersion and the type of learning motivation after the non-face-to-face class was finished. The measured data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and multiple regression analysis. As a result, in the results for all students, the performance approach goal had the most influence on immersion, and the mastery goal orientation had the next effect. Performance avoidance orientation had no effect. For students in non-face-to-face classes, performance approach goal orientation had an effect on immersion, and for students in real-time non-face-to-face classes, mastery goal orientation had an effect. The implications that can be obtained from the results of this study are as follows. First, non-real-time non-face-to-face classes should cover basic knowledge and skills so that there are no mistakes and failures. Second, non-real-time non-face-to-face classes should allow tasks with appropriate difficulty to be performed with a deadline. Third, real-time non-face-to-face classes should lower the fear of mistakes and failures.

본 연구는 비대면 수업 방식에 의해 몰입에 대한 학습동기의 영향을 검증하였다. 이를 위해서 유아교육을 전공하고 있는 101명의 대학생을 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 연구대상의 평균 연령은 22.6세이며, 비실시간 비대면 수업을 수강한 학생은 51명이며, 실시간 비대면 수업을 수강한 학생은 50명이다. 연구는 비대면 수업이 종료된 이후에 몰입 수준과 학습동기 유형을 측정하였다. 측정된 자료는 기술통계분석과 다중회귀분석을 사용하여 분석하였다. 그 결과, 전체 학생을 대상으로 한 결과는 몰입에 대해 수행접근목표가 가장 많은 영향을 주었고, 숙달목표지향이 다음으로 영향을 주었다. 수행회피지향은 영향을 주지 못했다. 비실시간 비대면 수업 학생들은 수행접근목표지향이 몰입에 영향을 주었고, 실시간 비대면 수업 학생들은 숙달목표지향이 영향을 주었다. 본 연구 결과를 통해서 얻을 수 있는 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 비실시간 비대면 수업은 실수와 실패가 없도록 기초적인 지식과 기능에 대한 내용을 다루어야 한다. 둘째, 비실시간 비대면 수업은 적절한 난이도를 가지고 있는 과제들을 마감 시간을 두고 수행하도록 해야 한다. 셋째, 실시간 비대면 수업은 실수와 실패에 대한 두려움을 낮추어야 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research fund of Baekseok University in 2021.

References

  1. Al-Balas, M., Al-Balas, H.I., Jaber, H.M. et al. (2020) Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20, 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4
  2. Alqahtani, A. Y. & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learning Managerial Perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1-16.
  3. Bui, T. H, Luong, D. H, Nguyen, X. A. Nguyen, H. L. & Ngo, T. T. (2020). Impact of female students' perceptions on behavioral intention to use video conferencing tools in COVID-19: Data of Vietnam. Data in Brief, 32, 106-142.
  4. Cho, E. S. (2020). Untact Classes in Post Covid-19: The Roles and Challenges of Educational Technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 693-713. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.693
  5. Choi, W. H. & Jen, Y. K. (2020). Non-face-to-face online class case study: Focusing on video recording and real-time video class. Field Class Study, 1(2), 1-28.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossy Bass.
  7. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), p. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  8. Do, J. W. (2020). An exploration of design obstacles that occur in the process of converting face-to-face classes to online classes. Education and Culture Research, 26(2). 153-173.
  9. Gyllenpalm, J. (2018). Inquiry and flow in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13, 429-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9794-9
  10. Kang, S. B. (2021). A study on operation and satisfaction of university online distance learning. Culture and Fusion, 43(1), p. 15-30.
  11. Kim, A. Y., Tak, H,. Y. & Lee, C. H. (2010). Development and Validation of Adult Learning Engagement Scale. Educational Psychology Research, 24(1), 39-59.
  12. Kim, K. J. & Na, Y. B. (2021). A study on the effect of online dance education education service quality on user satisfaction, continued use intention, and academic continuation intention. Digital Converttgence Research, 19(1), p. 401-410.
  13. Kim, M. U., Kim, M. J., Oh, Y. I. & Jeong, S. Y. (2020) The effect of online lecture substitution due to COVID-19 on learning motivation of nursing students, interaction between professors and students, and satisfaction with online classes. Research on Learner-Centered Curriculum and Education, 20(17), 519-541.
  14. Kwon, S. (2020). Educational task after COVID-19: re-examination of discrepancy, inequality and role of school. Seoul Education Issue Paper, 2(26), 1-14.
  15. Lee, E. C. (2018). Investigation of reaction behaviors to teaching messages according to the type of learning motivation in the online cooperative learning environment. Journal of the Korean Content Society, 18(5), 514-524.
  16. Lee, E. C. (2021). Exploring the Moderating Effect of Difficulty in Recognized Curriculum Task on the Mediator Model of Interesting and Learning Motivation on Flow in Distant PBL Classes of Pre-service Teachers. Journal of the Korean Contents Association, 21(2), 594-603.
  17. Milner, A. R. Templin, M. A., & Czerniak, C. M. (2011). Elementary Science Students' Motivation and Learning Strategy Use: Constructivist Classroom Contextual Factors in a Life Science Laboratory and a Traditional Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9200-5
  18. Ministry of Education (2020). Digital based Higher Education Innovation Support System. News Report.
  19. Oh, J. (2020). Foredated future by COVID 19: From education age to Learning age. Gyongi Research Institute. Issue & Diagnosis, 421.
  20. Park, B. W. & Lee, C. W. (2020), A study on the influence of lms users' system environment on their intention to use in the non-face-to-face era. Logos Management Research, 18(4), 193-207.
  21. Park, E. H. & Seong, J. H. (2020). An Exploratory Study on Social Presence in Synchronous Distance Course: Focused on the Cases of Christian Education Classes. The Korean Journal of Christian Education, 64, 203-235.
  22. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning. The University of Michigan.
  23. Wanga, Y., Pengb, H., Huangb, R., Houc, Y., & Wangb, J. (2008). Characteristics of distance learners: research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open Learning, 23(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701815277
  24. Wood, K. D. (2004). Motivating student interest with the Imagine, Elaborate, Prediet, and Confirm (IEPC) strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.4.4