Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of Evaluation for Visiting Care Service Institution: From the User's Point of View

방문요양서비스 기관 평가의 효과성 : 이용자 관점에서

  • Cho, Han-Ra (Dept, of Social Welfare, Korea National University of Welfare)
  • 조한라 (한국복지대학교 사회복지과)
  • Received : 2022.02.21
  • Accepted : 2022.05.20
  • Published : 2022.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to confirm the effectiveness of the evaluation of long-term care insurance visiting care service institutions for the elderly from the user's point of view. To this end, data from a survey of 266 users collected through allocation sampling by region(14 cities and counties) in Jeollabuk-do and public data from 47 institutions were combined and analyzed using a multi-layered model. The main research results are as follows. First, among the five evaluation areas, the higher the score in the 'Rights·Responsibility' area, which is to give users a sense of rights and respect users, the higher the service quality and satisfaction. Second, among the five evaluation areas, the 'Rights·Responsibility' area had an effect on loyalty. In addition, it was found that the 'Outcome' area for satisfaction with institutions and employees and changes in users had an effect on loyalty. Third, it was found that 'Institutional Management', 'Environment·Safety', 'Process' did not affect service quality, satisfaction, and loyalty. Based on these results, it is proposed to reorganize the evaluation scale that users can recognize and that is faithful to the purpose.

본 연구의 목적은 이용자의 관점에서 노인장기요양보험 방문요양서비스 기관 평가의 효과성을 확인하는 것이다. 이를 위해, 전라북도 내 지역별(14개 시·군) 할당표집을 통해 수집한 이용자(266명) 설문자료와 기관(47개) 자료를 결합하여 다층모형으로 분석하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 5개 평가영역 중 이용자에게 권리의식을 갖게하고, 이용자를 존중하는지에 대한 '권리·책임' 영역의 점수가 높을수록 서비스 품질과 만족도도 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 5개 평가영역 중 '권리·책임' 영역과 '급여제공결과' 영역이 충성도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, '기관운영', '환경·안전', '급여제공과정' 영역은 서비스 품질, 만족도, 충성도에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 형식적이고 정량적인 평가지표보다는 이용자가 인식할 수 있고, 방문요양서비스의 기본 목적에 충실한 내용으로 평가지표를 재구성할 것 등을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. KOSIS (2022). Statistics Korea (Online). https://kosis.kr
  2. R. H. Binstock. (2007). Our Aging Societies: Ethical, Moral, and Policy Challenges. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 12(1), 3-9. DOI : 10.3233/JAD-2007-12102
  3. J. A. Riggs. (2001). The health and long-term care policy challenges of Alzheimer's disease. Aging & Mental Health, 5(1), 138-145. DOI : 10.1080/713650013
  4. L. Polivka. (2008). The Decisive Role of the States in Aging Policy. American Society on Aging, 32(3), 5-9.
  5. M. Daly. (2002). Care as a Good For Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy, 37(2), 251-270. DOI : 10.1017/S0047279401006572
  6. H. B. Cha & D. Sunwoo. (2013). Development Process and Future Improvement Issues of Long-Term Care Insurance for The Elderly. The Journal of Korearn Long-Term Care, 1(1), 8-30.
  7. National Health Insurance Corporation. (2021). Plan for Regular Evaluation of Long-Term Care Institutions in 2021.
  8. Y. J. Kim, Y. J. Kim & S. J. Lee. (2019). Verification of Effectiveness of Evaluation of Long-Term Care Institution. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 9(5), 781-791. DOI : 10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.5.072
  9. J. S. Kim. (2010). An Efficiency Analysis of the Long-Term Care Facilities Using DEA Model. Baekseok University Christian Graduate School Ph.D. Thesis.
  10. T. W. Lee et al. (2012). Development of the Quality Indicators in Long Term Care Service. The Journal of Korean Nursing Administration Academic Society, 18(1), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2012.18.1.106
  11. S. J. Lee & Y. J. Kim. (2019). Development of Evaluation Index and Multi-layer Evaluation System for Quality Management of Elderly Long-term Care Institution. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 9(11), 1015-1026 DOI : 10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.11.091
  12. T. S. Jun & K. H. Jun. (2013). A Study Perception on the Importance and Applicability of the Evaluation Indexes of Long-Term Care Institution Employees. Korea Care Management Research. 8, 43-74.
  13. J. E. Yoo. (2017). How the Change in the Evaluation Policy Affects the Grade, Closure, and Reinstallation of Long-Term Care Facilities?. Health and Social Welfare Review, 37(4), 71-97. DOI : 10.15709/hswr.2017.37.4.71
  14. C. H. Kang & M. S. Jung. (2002). A Study on the Performance of the Human Service Organizations : An Analysis from the Perspective of Quality of Output. Korean Journal of social welfare. 48, 343-378.
  15. Y. Atsushi, Y. D. Kim, D. S. Lee & I. M. Hwang. (2015). A Comparative Study on the Changes of LTC Quality Measuring Indicators - focusing on US, UK and Japan. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 17(2), 153-182. DOI : 10.22944/kswa.2015.17.2.006
  16. B. J. LEE. (2013). Performance Management and Evaluation of Community Welfare Agency's Social Services : What, Why, and How. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 15(1), 197-221. DOI : 10.22944/kswa.2013.15.1.008
  17. R. D. Behn. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
  18. Byford, Sarah, David & T. Sefton. (2003). Because it's worth it: a practical guide to conducting economic evaluations in the social welfare field, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  19. National Health Insurance Corporation. (2016). 2016 Visiting Care Institution Evaluation Manual.
  20. A. Donabedian. (1988). The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?. Jama, 260(12), 1743-1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
  21. MEDI:GATE NEWS. (2020). As a Result of Evaluation of Home-Based Long-Term Care Institutions, Grades A and B Rose by 9.2%p. (Online). http://medigatenews.com/news/2010789810.
  22. C. H. Shin. (2012). A Study on the Factors Affecting Social Service Satisfaction Using Voucher - Focusing on the Community Social Investment Service -. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 64(4), 137-161. DOI : 10.20970/kasw.2012.64.4.006
  23. J. Y. Lee & M. J. Lee. (2011). A Qualitative Study on the Quality of Long-term Care Services Perceived by Care Service Managers: Concept, Barriers, and Evaluation. Journal of Welfere for the Aged, 53, 59-57. DOI : 10.21194/kjgsw..53.201109.27
  24. C. H. Kang & Y. H. Hur. (2015). A Study of the Relationship between Human Resource Management & Financial Resource Management and Service Quality in Social Service Organizations. Korean Journal of social welfare, 67(4), 51-77. DOI : 10.20970/kasw.2015.67.4.003
  25. J. N. Lee. (2012). Analysis on Service Management of In-home Care Service Agency for the elderly: Focus on Structure-Process-Outcome Model. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 14(4), 141-164. DOI : 10.22944/kswa.2012.14.4.006
  26. J. J. Cronin & S. A. Taylor. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing. 56(3), 55-68. DOI : 10.1177/002224299205600304
  27. C. Fornell. (1992), A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252129
  28. H. R. Cho & Y. H. Yeo. (2018). Analysis of Influencing Factors of Customer Satisfaction and Intention of Follow-up Behavior among Elderly Care Service Users Utilizing Multi-level Model. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare. 73(1), 361-384. DOI : 10.21194/kjgsw.73.1.201803.361
  29. National Health Insurance Corporation. (2017). Results of Regular Evaluation of Long-Term Care Institutions in 2016.
  30. H. R. Cho & Y. H. Yeo. (2018). The Mediation Effects of Choice on Relationship between Information Literacy and Quality of Elderly Care Service Users: Based on the "SERVPERF Model". Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. 37(2), 385-398.
  31. J. H. Park. (2011). Influences of Service Quality on Service Satisfaction in the Long-term Care Service at Home: Centered on Home Help Service. Social Welfare Policy, 38(1), 227-246. DOI : 10.15855/swp.2011.38.1.227
  32. S. H. Kim. (2017). The Moderating Effect of Switching Barriers in the Relationship between Social Service Relationship Quality and Service Loyalty. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 19(1), 171-198. DOI : 10.22944/kswa.2017.19.1.006
  33. T. M. Song & J. Y. Song. (2013). Big Data Analysis Methodology: Focusing on Structural Equation Model and Multilayer Model. Hannara Academy.
  34. T. Y. Maeng & Y. M. Shim. (2011). A Study on the Influence of the Welfare Service Quality for the Elderly and Customer's Satisfaction upon Intention of Re-use. Health and Social Welfare Review, 31(2), 180-205. DOI : 10.15709/hswr.2011.31.2.180
  35. M. M. Choi., J. Lim., S. Y. Kim & K. S. Kim. (2015). What did Social Workers Experience and What do They Want for the Evaluation System of Social Welfare Facilities?. Journal of Korean social welfare administration, 17(3), 1-26. DOI : 10.22944/kswa.2015.17.3.001
  36. National Law Information Center. (n, d,). Long-Term Care Insurance Act for the Elderly (Online). https://www.law.go.kr