정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제26권6호
  • /
  • Pages.517-532
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교육대학원생의 비대면 온라인 강의 만족도, 학습지속의향, 추천 의향에 미치는 예측 요인에관한연구

A study on prediction influence factor of Graduate Students inEducation Learning satisfaction, persistence, recommend intention

  • 김재금 (우즈베키스탄 한국국제대학교)
  • Kim-Jae Kum (Uzbekistan-Korea international University)
  • 투고 : 2022.10.29
  • 심사 : 2022.12.09
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 교육대학원생들을 대상으로 비대면 온라인 수업에 관한 주관적 만족도, 학습지속의향 추천 의향의관계와 이에 영향을 미치는 예측 요인들을 실증적 검증하였다. 이에 서울권에 위치하고 있는 E모 대학교의 교육전문 대학원생을 대상으로(N=417) 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 교육대학원생의 비대면 수업 학습 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 사회적 현존감, 인지된 유용성, 정보시스템품질로 나타났다. 둘째, 학습지속의향에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 인지된 유용성과 사회적 현존감으로 나타났고 인지된 유용성의 영향력이 매우 컸다. 그리고 교육대학원 학습자의 주관적인 만족도는 학습지속의향에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않아, 만족스러운 태도를 형성한다고 해서 학습지속의향이란 행동으로까지 연결되지는 않음을 검증하였다. 마지막으로 학습만족도는 타인 추천 의향에 긍정적인 영향을 또한 학습지속의향 역시 타인 추천 의향에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤으나, 주목할 점으로 학습만족도가 타인 추천 의향에 미치는 영향력이 상대적으로 매우 컸다는 점이다. 이는 교육대학원 학습자 개인이 인식하는 비대면 온라인 수업에 대한 주관적 태도인 만족도가 최종적으로 타인에게 교육대학원을 추천하는 중요한 역할을 수행한다고 볼 수 있다. 본 연구는 교육대학원생들의 온라인 수업에 대한 전반적 인식을 살펴보았고, 향후 본 연구의 결과가 실제 반영되어 비대면 온라인 수업 커리큘럼과 콘텐츠 구성의 기초 자료로서 실무적 의의를 지닌다.

As a result of the this exploratory study the main results show that the factors affecting the satisfaction of non-face-to-face class learning of graduate students in Education were social presence, perceived easy to use, and information service quality. Secondly, the factors affecting the learning persistence were perceived usefulness and social presence, but perceived usefulness's influence was relatively small. Next, it was found that the subjective satisfaction of graduate students of education did not significantly affect their intention to continue learning persistence. Lastly, learning satisfaction and learning persistence had a positive effect on the intention to recommend to others. Through the this empirical analysitics study it demonstrate the factors such as attitudes, feelings, and friendliness toward non-face-to-face online classes perceived by graduate students in Education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological bulletin, 84(5), 888.
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user's guide. Amos Development Corporation, SPSS Inc, 226-229.
  3. Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., & Mamat, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13.
  4. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the association for information systems, 8(4), 3.
  5. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & virtual environments, 12(5), 456-480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International journal of testing, 1(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  7. Chaniotis, A. (2013). Staging and feeling the presence of god: emotion and theatricality in religious celebrations in the Roman East. In Panth?e: Religious Transformations in the Graeco-Roman Empire (pp. 169-189). Brill.
  8. Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
  10. Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600103
  11. Gall, V., Runde, M., & Schuchmann, H. P. (2016). Extending applications of high-pressure homogenization by using simultaneous emulsification and mixing (SEM)-An overview. P rocesses, 4(4), 46.
  12. Jeong, H. H. (2020). Comparison of Predictive Models for Adult Learners' Continuous Intention to Use Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Era: Focusing on the Specialized Graduate Schools. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 16(3), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2020.8.16.3.121
  13. Heo, G. (2009). A Study on Factors Affecting the Satisfaction and Intention of Educational Service in the Graduate School of Education. Korean Business Education Review, 54(1), 1-22.
  14. Eom, H. S. (2000). A Study on the Measurement of Service Quality in Information Systems. Korean Corporation Management Review, 7(1), 155-180.
  15. Eom, H. S. (2000). A Study on the Measurement of Service Quality in Information Systems. Korean Corporation Management Review, 7(1), 155-180.
  16. Huang, M. P., & Alessi, N. E. (1999). Presence as an emotional experience. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 148-153.
  17. Park, H. S. & So, H. J. (2021). Examining the Relationships between Learning Presence and Learning Performance in Distance Lectures Perceived by University Students During COVID-19. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 27(1), 253-280. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.27.1.253
  18. Cho, I. Y., Lee, J. Y., Park, T. G., Kim, K. B., Jeung, Y. M. & Cho, D. U. (2021). Suggestions for Effective Voice Transmission Method of Lecture Content in Non-Face-to-Face Era. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 46(4),671-678.
  19. Jeong, Y. H., & Park, J. Y. (2017). The effects of professor presence and interaction on PAD and satisfaction in a university class. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(7), 144-157.
  20. Jin, H. K., & Kim, D. C. (2017). The Effects of Physical Environment on Student's Satisfaction and Class Concentration in College Education Services. Korean Business Education Review, 32(3), 355-377. https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2017.32.3.355
  21. Lee, J. Y., Sung, E. M., Lee, J. E., Lim, K. Y. & Han, S. Y. (2020). Challenges and tasks facing online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 671-692. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.36.3.671
  22. Lee, J. M. (2012). Study on the Effect of Sociability, Ease of Use, Usefulness, Enjoyment on Acceptance Intention in e-Learning - A Perspective of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 12(4), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.417
  23. Jung, Y. M., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, S. S. (2010). A study on the measurement and improvement of academic library service quality by ISA (Importance-Satisfaction Analysis). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1), 255-272.
  24. Kang, D. H. (2006). Study on Unit-Learning of Korean Language through ICT : centered on Korean(1) Textbook of High School, Master's Thesis, Kangwon National University.
  25. Kim, H. S., & Park, Y. J. (2004). Development and Measurement of User Satisfaction Index Model for Information Systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(4),153-171.
  26. Kim, M. E., Kim, M. J., Oh, Y. I., & Jung, S. Y. (2020). The effect of online substitution class caused by coronavirus (COVID-19) on the learning motivation, instructor-learner interaction, and class satisfaction of nursing students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 519-541.
  27. Kline, R. B (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 16(4), 343-364.
  28. Choi, K. H. & Lee, S. J. (2005). A Suggestion on Instruction Service Quality Assessment Tool. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 18(2), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2005.18.2.487
  29. Lee, J. S. & Jang, S. Y. (2003). Users' Acceptance of Information Systems in Extended Technology Acceptance Model. korean management review, 32(5), 1415-1451.
  30. Lee, J. H., Lim, S. Y., Lee, E. J. & Tak G. O. (2020). The Effects of Screen Golf User's Presence on Immersion, User Satisfaction and Revisit Intention. Journal of Golf Studies, 14(4), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.34283/ksgs.2020.14.4.32
  31. Lowenthal, P. R., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. Distance Education, 38(2), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172
  32. Seo, M. R. & Rhee, Y. N. (2019). Effects of Corporate Social Media (SNS) Communication on Organization-Public Relationships : An Exploratory Study on Interrelationships among Social Presence, Corporate Identity, Company-Customer Identification. Journal of Public Relations, 23(3), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2019.23.3.31
  33. Lee, M. K. (2002). e - SERVQUAL : A Scale for Measuring Consumer Evaluations of Internet Service Quality. Korean Journal of Marketing, 17(1), 73-95.
  34. Kim, N. I. (2020). A Study on the Satisfaction of Non-face-to-face Online Class - Focused on K University. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 11(5), 1145-1157.
  35. Park, S. J. (2016). The Tasks and Reflection on Pre-service Teacher Education in the Graduate School of Education. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 16(2), 829-846.
  36. Chen, Q. Q. & Park, H. J. (2018). Consumer Study on the Acceptance of VR Headsets based on the Extended TAM. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(6), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.6.117
  37. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C. & Alcaiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993
  38. Short, R. V. (1976). Definition of the problem-the evolution of human reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 195(1118), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1976.0095
  39. Song, S. Y., & Kim, H. K. (2020). Exploring factors influencing college students' satisfaction and persistent intention to take non-face-to-face courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of Education, 21(4), 1099-1126. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2020.12.21.4.1099
  40. Song, Y. H. (2020). The influence of instructor's non-verbal communication on college student's emotional presence, rapport and learning satisfaction. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(10), 259-267.
  41. Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52(1), 313-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8
  42. Temme, D., Paulssen, M., & Dannewald, T. (2008). Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models-a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software. Business Research, 1(2), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03343535
  43. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.(2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  44. Choi, W. S., Kang, D. Y., Choi, S. J. M. (2017). Understanding Factors Influencing Usage and Purchase Intention of a VR Device : An Extension of UTAUT2. Information Society & Media, 18(3), 173-208.
  45. Kim, Y. M. & Pak, K. H. (2018). The Effects of Learning Presence on Learning Flow and Learning Performance in e-Learning. The e-Business Studies, 19(3), 99-115.
  46. Lee, S. Y. & Kim. H. J. (2019). A Study on the Factors Affecting Flow in e-Learning Environment - Focusing on Interaction Factors and Affordance -. JOURNAL OF THE KOREACONTENTS ASSOCIATION, 19(10), 522-534.
  47. Joo, Y. J., Choi, H. R., Lee, Y. H. LEE, Y. K. (2010). The Structural Relationship among On-line task value, University support, Satisfaction, Learning persistence in Cyber Education. JOURNAL OF The Korean Association of information Education, 14(3), 341-353.