정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제26권5호
  • /
  • Pages.317-325
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2015 개정 교육과정 실과교과서 '소프트웨어 교육' 단원 삽화 분석

Analysis of Illustrations for the 2015 Revised Curriculum Practical Textbook 'Software Education'

  • 투고 : 2022.06.23
  • 심사 : 2022.08.31
  • 발행 : 2022.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

교과서에서 삽화는 개념을 쉽게 설명하고, 탐구과정을 안내하기 위해 사용된다. 따라서 삽화를 정확하고 이해하기 쉽게 제시해야 한다. 그런데 선행 연구를 분석한 결과 초등학교 '소프트웨어 교육' 단원의 경우, 삽화 분석과 관련된 연구가 전혀 없는 것으로 확인되었다. 이에 본 연구에서 2015 개정 교육과정에 따라 개발된 6종의 실과 교과서 중 '소프트웨어 교육' 단원의 삽화를 종류, 기능, 용도 측면에서 분석하여 현장에서 이루어질 교과서 채택, 교육과정 연구, 차기 교과서 개발 등에 참고할 수 있는 가이드라인을 제공하였다. 6종의 실과 교과서를 분석한 결과 모든 교과서가 페이지 당 1개 이상의 삽화를 사용하였고, 삽화의 종류는 화면캡쳐, 그림, 만화, 사진, 표, 도해 순, 삽화의 기능은 설명적 기능, 수행적 기능, 장식적 기능, 예시적 기능 순, 용도는 활동안내, 자료제공, 결과제시, 동기유발 순으로 활용되는 것으로 분석되었다.

In textbooks, illustrations are used to easily explain concepts and guide the exploration process. Therefore, the illustration should be presented accurately and easily. However, as a result of analyzing previous studies, it was confirmed that there was no research related to illustration analysis at all in the case of the elementary school 'software education' unit. Therefore, among the six practical textbooks developed according to the 2015 revised curriculum, the illustration of the 'software education' unit was analyzed in terms of type, function, and use, and provided guidelines for the adoption of textbooks, curriculum research, and next textbook development. As a result of analyzing six practical textbooks, all textbooks used more than one illustration per page, and the types of illustrations were used in the order of screen capture, picture, picture, table, illustration, illustrative function, and use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y.Y. Kwon, H.B. Yoo, E.Y. Jeong.(2011). An Analysis of Illustrations in Middle School Science Textbooks -Focused on the Unit "Digestion and Circulation"-. Biology Education, 39(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2011.39.4.517
  2. KICE and et al.(2011). Significance of the compilation of textbooks for elementary and secondary schools according to the notice of revision of curriculum of elementary and secondary schools and the standards for verification.
  3. M.S. Seung, H.I Chae, H.J Lim.(2016). Analysis of the Characters' Role Presenting Elementary School Science Textbook: Targeting the 2009 Revised Science 4th-Grade Textbook. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(1), 167-175.
  4. Pozzer, Roth.(2005). Making sense of photographs. Wiley Periodicals, 89, 219-241.
  5. Sipe, L. R. (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships.
  6. Children's Literature in Education, 29(2), 97-108.
  7. S.H. Park, J.O. Woo.(1994). A Comparative Study on the Illustration of Natural Textbooks in Korean and Japanese Primary Schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(1), 58-69.
  8. E.S. Kim, I.G. Kim.(1996). Middle School Students' Understanding on Figures about Force & Motion Presented in Science Textbook. Bulletin of Science Education, 12(0), 37-63.
  9. S.M. Lee.(2007). Research on illustrations related to chemistry in middle school science textbook : their use in classrooms and ways to improve them. Yonsei University.
  10. Y.S. Hong.(2002). High school students' understanding of illustrations in high school science textbooks. Chungbuk National University.
  11. I.H. Yang, J.E. Lee, S.M. Lim.(2007). Research Articles : How does Elementary Students Understand Illustrations in Science Textbook?. Elementary Ccience Education, 26(5), 475-488.
  12. K.Y. Lee.(2007). Comparative Analysis of the Function and Structure of Photographs and Illustrations Used in High School Earth Science Textbooks of the 6th and 7th National Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(7), 811-824. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.7.811
  13. E.K. Lee.(2009). The Effects of Presentation Types on Students' Understanding of Textbook Illustrations. Journal of Geographic and Environmental Education, 17(2), 177-188.
  14. Jongeun Kim, Hyo Kwan Dong, Yong-jin Kim. (2018). The Students' Perception on the Real Thing's Actual Size through the Illustrations in Life Science's Textbooks. Biology Education, 46(3), 398-410. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2018.46.3.398
  15. Lee Chang-wook, Jeong Hong-cheol. (2019). AComparative Study on Design in Korean Language Textbook of Elementary School for Creativity Improvement. Journal of Communication Design, 68(0), 24-31.
  16. Hong Gap Ju. (2019). The connection between illustrations and contents in elementary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematical Education, 58(2), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.2.225
  17. Jang Soo Bin. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis of Elementary Moral Education Textbooks: Focusing on the Contents Related to National Identity. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 51(1), 175-206. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.51.1.201903.007
  18. J.H.Lee, S.I.Gen.(2020). Inquisitive Tendency Comparative Analysis on the Software Education Units in the 2015 Revised Practical Arts Textbook. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 24(6). 615-622. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.6.615
  19. N.E. Lee, J.G. Kim.(2014). An Analysis of Illustrations in the Unit 'The Human in the Nature' of High School Life Science Textbooks. School Science Journal, 8(1), 86-94.
  20. H.J. Kim, Y.A. Son, B.M. Min.(2009). Development and Application of Standard for Analyzing Inscriptions Used in Biology1 Textbooks. Biology Education, 37(3), 390-402. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2009.37.3.390
  21. Y.Y. Kwon, H.B. Yoo, E.Y. Jeong.(2011). An Analysis of Illustrations in Middle School Science Textbooks -Focused on the Unit "Digestion and Circulation"-. Biology Education, 39(4), 517-528 https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2011.39.4.517