DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A novel longitudinal seismic self-centering system for RC continuous bridges using SMA rebars and friction dampers

  • Xiang, Nailiang (School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology) ;
  • Jian, Nanyi (Department of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology) ;
  • Nonaka, Tetsuya (Department of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2021.06.29
  • Accepted : 2022.01.27
  • Published : 2022.05.25

Abstract

This study proposes a novel longitudinal self-centering earthquake resistant system for reinforced concrete (RC) continuous bridges by using superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforcement and friction dissipation mechanism. The SMA reinforcing bars are implemented in the fixed piers to provide self-recentering forces, while the friction dampers are used at the movable substructures like end abutments to enhance the energy dissipation of the bridge system. A reasonable balance between self-centering and energy dissipation capacities should be well achieved by properly selecting the parameters of the SMA rebars and friction dampers. A two-span continuous bridge with one fixed pier and two abutments is chosen as a prototype for illustration. Different longitudinal earthquake resistant systems including the proposed one in this study are investigated and compared. The results indicate that compared with the designs of over-dissipation (e.g., excessive friction) and over-self-centering (e.g., pure SMAs), the proposed system with balanced design between self-centering and energy dissipation would perform satisfactorily in controlling both the peak and residual displacement ratios of the bridge system.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The research described in this paper was financially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant No. 20 K14811).

References

  1. Akiyama, M., Takahashi, Y., Hata, Y. and Honda, R. (2016), "Lessons from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake based on field investigations of damage to bridges", Int. J. Earthq. Impact Eng., 1(3), 225-252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIE.2016.081762.
  2. Auricchio, F. and Sacco, E. (1997), "A superelastic shapememory-alloy beam model", J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct., 8(6), 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9700800602.
  3. Auricchio, F., Taylor, R.L. and Lubliner, J. (1997), "Shapememory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 146(3-4), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01232-7.
  4. Billah, A.M. and Alam, M.S. (2016), "Plastic hinge length of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete bridge pier", Eng. Struct., 117, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.050.
  5. Billah, A.M. and Alam, M.S. (2018), "Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of concrete bridge piers reinforced with different types of shape memory alloys", Eng. Struct., 162, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.034.
  6. Chen, X., Xia, X., Zhang, X. and Gao, J. (2020), "Seismic performance and design of bridge piers with rocking isolation", Struct. Eng. Mech., 73(4), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.4.447.
  7. Chen, X., Xiang, N., Guan, Z. and Li, J. (2022), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of tall pier bridges under mainshock-aftershock-like earthquake sequences using vector-valued intensity measure", Eng. Struct., 253, 113732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113732.
  8. Dong, H., Du, X., Han, Q., Bi, K. and Hao, H. (2019), "Hysteretic performance of RC double-column bridge piers with self-centering buckling-restrained braces", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(6), 3255-3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00586-4.
  9. Gidaris, I. and Taflanidis, A.A. (2015), "Performance assessment and optimization of fluid viscous dampers through life-cycle cost criteria and comparison to alternative design approaches", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(4), 1003-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9646-5.
  10. Goo, B.C. and Lexcellent, C. (1997), "Micromechanics-based modeling of two-way memory effect of a single crystalline shape-memory alloy", Acta Materialia, 45(2), 727-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00172-3.
  11. Huang, M. and Brinson, L.C. (1998), "A multivariant model for single crystal shape memory alloy behavior", J. Mech. Phys. Solid., 46(8), 1379-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00080-X.
  12. Jia, Z., Wen, J., Han, Q., Du, X. and Zhang, J. (2021), "Seismic response of a Reduced-scale continuous girder bridge with rocking Columns: Experiment and analysis", Eng. Struct., 248, 113265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113265.
  13. JRA (2002), Specifications for Highway Bridges: Part V Seismic Design, Japan Road Association, Tokyo, Japan.
  14. Kawashima, K. (2012), "Damage of bridges due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake", J. JPN Assoc. Earthq. Eng., 12(4), 4_319-4_338. https://doi.org/10.5610/jaee.12.4_319.
  15. Kawashima, K., MacRae, G.A., Hoshikuma, J.I. and Nagaya, K. (1998), "Residual displacement response spectrum", J. Struct. Eng., 124(5), 523-530. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523).
  16. Lee, W.K. and Billington, S.L. (2010), "Modeling residual displacements of concrete bridge columns under earthquake loads using fiber elements", J. Bridge Eng., 15(3), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000059.
  17. Li, J., Peng, T. and Xu, Y. (2008), "Damage investigation of girder bridges under the Wenchuan earthquake and corresponding seismic design recommendations", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(4), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1005-6.
  18. Li, S., Wang, J.Q. and Alam, M.S. (2021), "Multi-criteria optimal design and seismic assessment of SMA RC piers and SMA cable restrainers for mitigating seismic damage of simply-supported highway bridges", Eng. Struct., 252, 113547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113547.
  19. Liang, C. and Rogers, C.A. (1997), "One-dimensional thermomechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials", J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct., 8(4), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9700800402.
  20. Marriott, D., Pampanin, S. and Palermo, A. (2009), "Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(3), 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.857.
  21. Ok, S.Y., Song, J. and Park, K.S. (2008), "Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method", Eng. Struct., 30(5), 1240-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.019.
  22. Shrestha, B. and Hao, H. (2016), "Parametric study of seismic performance of super-elastic shape memory alloy-reinforced bridge piers", Struct. Infrastr. Eng., 12(9), 1076-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1076856.
  23. Su, C., Xian, J. and Huang, H. (2021), "An iterative equivalent linearization approach for stochastic sensitivity analysis of hysteretic systems under seismic excitations based on explicit time-domain method", Comput. Struct., 242, 106396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106396.
  24. Tanaka, K. and Nagaki, S. (1982), "A thermomechanical description of materials with internal variables in the process of phase transitions", Ingenieur-Archiv, 51(5), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00536655.
  25. Upadhyay, A., Pantelides, C.P. and Ibarra, L. (2019), "Residual drift mitigation for bridges retrofitted with buckling restrained braces or self centering energy dissipation devices", Eng. Struct., 199, 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109663.
  26. Wilson, P. and Elgamal, A (2006), "Large scale measurement of lateral earth pressure on bridge abutment back-wall subjected to static and dynamic loading", Proceedings of the New Zealand Workshop on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, January.
  27. Xian, J., Su, C. and Spencer Jr., B.F. (2020), "Stochastic sensitivity analysis of energy-dissipating structures with nonlinear viscous dampers by efficient equivalent linearization technique based on explicit time-domain method", Prob. Eng. Mech., 61, 103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2020.103080.
  28. Xiang, N. and Alam, M.S. (2019a), "Displacement-based seismic design of bridge bents retrofitted with various bracing devices and their seismic fragility assessment under near-fault and far-field ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 119, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.023.
  29. Xiang, N. and Alam, M.S. (2019b), "Comparative seismic fragility assessment of an existing isolated continuous bridge retrofitted with different energy dissipation devices", J. Bridge Eng., 24(8), 04019070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001425.
  30. Xiang, N., Chen, X. and Alam, M.S. (2020), "Probabilistic seismic fragility and loss analysis of concrete bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy-steel coupled reinforcing bars", Eng. Struct., 207, 110229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110229.
  31. Xiang, N., Goto, Y., Alam, M.S. and Li, J. (2021), "Effect of bonding or unbonding on seismic behavior of bridge elastomeric bearings: Lessons learned from past earthquakes in China and Japan and inspirations for future design", Adv. Bridge Eng., 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-021-00036-9.
  32. Xiang, N., Goto, Y., Obata, M. and Alam, M.S. (2019), "Passive seismic unseating prevention strategies implemented in highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review", Eng. Struct., 194, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.051.
  33. Xue, D., Bi, K., Dong, H., Qin, H., Han, Q. and Du, X. (2021), "Development of a novel self-centering slip friction brace for enhancing the cyclic behaviors of RC double-column bridge bents", Eng. Struct., 232, 111838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111838.
  34. Yang, C. and Okumus, P. (2017), "Ultra-high-performance concrete for posttensioned precast bridge piers for seismic resilience", J. Struct. Eng., 143(12), 04017161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001906.