Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effectiveness of the Living Lab-based Elementary School Data Science Program

리빙랩 기반 초등학교 데이터 과학 프로그램의 효과성 분석

  • Received : 2022.01.27
  • Accepted : 2022.02.13
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In addition to the rapid changes in the times caused by the pandemic, the revision of the new curriculum coincides with the change in the proportion of the three elements of learners, society, and subjects that make up the curriculum. In particular, along with the proportion of 'social' in the curriculum, the scope of the word 'educational community' has increased, and the allowable range of curriculum restructuring centered on it has expanded. In order for the intended direction of education to be properly established in the new curriculum, various educational method studies are needed to cultivate newly emerged competencies and literacy. In this study, after selecting the contents and goals of the convergence curriculum based on various criteria for subject selection, the data science program was designed by reconstructing Living Lab's PDIE methodology. As an evaluation factor for this, we tried to analyze the effectiveness of 'creativity', 'problem-solving ability', 'communication ability', 'collaboration ability' among future competencies emphasized in the curriculum. As a result of the study, it was effective in improving creative and communication skills, and this study focuses on verifying the effectiveness of School Living Lab, suggesting the necessity of post-research that expands the application space of research and diversifies the role of educational community subjects.

팬데믹으로 인한 급격한 시대적 변화와 더불어 새로운 교육과정의 개정이 맞물리며 교육과정을 구성하는 학습자, 사회, 교과의 세 요소의 비중 변화가 불가피한 현실이다. 특히 교육과정에서 '사회'의 비중과 함께 '교육공동체'라는 단어의 범위가 커지고 이를 중심으로 한 교육과정 재구성의 허용 범위가 넓어졌다. 새로운 교육과정에서 의도하는 교육의 방향이 제대로 정착되기 위해서는 새롭게 등장한 역량과 문해력 등을 함양하기 위한 다양한 교육 방법적 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 교과 선정의 다양한 기준을 중심으로 융합 교과 내용과 목표를 선정한 후 이를 바탕으로 리빙랩의 PDIE 방법론을 재구성하여 데이터 과학 프로그램을 설계하였다. 이에 대한 평가 요소로 교육과정에서 강조하는 미래 역량 중 '창의성', '문제해결력', '의사소통 능력', '협업능력'에 대한 효과성을 분석하고자 하였다. 연구 결과 창의성과 의사소통능력 향상에 효과가 있었으며, 본 연구는 학교 교육과정내의 문제를 해결하는 스쿨 리빙랩의 효과성 검증에 초점을 두고 연구를 진행하여 일반화에 제한이 있다는 측면에서 연구의 적용 공간을 넓히고 교육공동체 주체의 역할 비중을 다양화 시킨 사후 연구 진행의 필요성을 제언한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim,B.S.(2007). The Hermeneutical Reconceptualizing of Curriculum and Teaching-Learning Process. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(4), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.25.4.200712.003003
  2. The Education Department.(2021). 2022 The revised general draft of the curriculum.
  3. Kim,S.Y.(2015). Practical Approach to the Curriculum Literacy of Elementary School Teachers. Doctoral Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  4. Park,H.S.(2021). An Action Research on the Early Experiences of Primary School Teachers in Developing teachers' Curriculum. Master Thesis. Graduate School of Education Policy at Korea National University of Education.
  5. Park,H.N., Jin,M.H., Park,J.W., Lim,K.Y.(2021). The Analysis of National and International Curricula for Digital Literacy Education. Journal of Education & Culture, 27(5), 75-101. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2021.27.5.75
  6. Kim,S.K.(2021). A Study of the Definition and Components of Data Literacy for K-12 AI Education. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 25(5), 691-704. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.5.691
  7. Ji,H.K.(2021). A Study on Development of an Instructional Design Model of Integrating Subject Matter and Software for Creative Problem Solving. Doctoral Thesis. Seoul National University Graduate School
  8. Kim,P.G.(2004). How Are Elementary Teachers Reorganizing Contents of the Textbooks and Teacher's Guides. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 135-161.
  9. Kim,P.G.(2005). Status of reconstruction of subject contents of secondary school teachers and their activation plans. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(4), 91-130.
  10. Hong,Y.K.(2011). Grounded Theoric Approach in Curriculum Design and Reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 5(2), 1-18.
  11. Lee,H.A.(2017). Effect of In-School Teacher Learning Community Level on Teachers' Competency to Organize and Operate School Curriculum. Master Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  12. Choi,E.J.(2017). A Case Study on the Thematic Integrated Learning as a Foundation of Building Village Based Education of Community. Master Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  13. Lee,H.W., Jeung,Y.K.(2017). A Reflective Review of the Connection Context Between the General Guidelines and the Subject Curriculum in the 2015 Revised Curriculum: Focused on the National Curriculum Specialized Guidelines Mediation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(3), 59-80.
  14. Hong,H.J., Lim,Y.N.(2014). A study of the development and direction of an integrated curriculum of liberal arts and the natural sciences in academic high schools. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 67-99. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.32.2.201406.004
  15. Lee.K.W.(2015). A Study on the Coordination of National Curriculums. Korea Institute of Curriculum Evaluation.
  16. Hong,H.J.(2006). Paradigm Shift in Curriculum Development and Quality Control of Korean National Curriculum Standards(3) - Focused on the relationship between General Guidelines and Subject-area Curriculum - The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 183-206.
  17. Seong,J.E., Song,W.J., Park,I.Y.(2013) The operating system and examples of Living Lab, STEP I insight, 127, 1-46.
  18. Seong,J.E., Kim,M.S.(2018) Living Labs as a Model for University Innovation. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 21(6), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2018.21.6.118
  19. Sim,J.W.(2020) Study on Education Methods for Academic Writing Using 'Living Lab'. The Journal of General Education, (12), 59-90
  20. Jo,H.A., Yoo,H.S., Kim,J.S.(2020) The Development of a Living Lab Education Program for 'Free-semester' technology-Home Economics subject Theme-selection activities. Journal of the Korean Institute of industrial educators, 46(3), 136-164
  21. Oh,Y.S.(2020) An Introduction and Application of a Health Living Lab Utilizing Online Messenger: with a Focus on Health Prevention Program for Fine Dust. Health and Social Welfare Review, 40(2), 352-386 https://doi.org/10.15709/HSWR.2020.40.2.352
  22. Seok,C.H.(2021) The Effects of Elementary Software Education Applying Living Lab Process on Convergence Talent Literacy and Creative Problem Solving. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  23. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
  24. Tom Mitchell. (2006). The discipline of machine learning, Machine Learning Department.
  25. Lee,J.Y. (2015). Data science and data literacy. A paper book of the Korean Society for Information Management, 11-15.
  26. Koo,D.H., Kim,D.J. (2020). Data science education program based on problem solving learning. Korean journal of elementary education, 31(0), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.20972/KJEE.31..202008.203
  27. Kim,Y.M., Kim,J.H. (2017). Effect of data science education program using spreadsheet on improvement of elementary school computational thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 21(2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.2.219
  28. Hur,K. (2021). A Study on Elementary Education Examples for Data Science using Entry. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 24(5), 473-481. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.5.473
  29. Paik,N.J.(2013). Teachers' interpretations of curriculum documents and curriculum potential. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(3), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.31.3.201309.009009
  30. So,G.H.(2003). Reconceptualization of Teacher Professionalism: Exploration of New Directions. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 77-96.
  31. Seo,K.H.(2009). Teachers' Experience of Reconstructing National Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 159-189. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.27.3.200909.007007
  32. Son,J.M.(2012). A case study on Project Learning of Architectural Design in Job-Specialized High School based on PDIE model of STEAM. The Korean Journal of Technology Education. 12(3), 132-155
  33. Morgan, David L., Krueger, Richard A.(2004). Focus group qualitative research method. Seoul: Hyeonmunsa .
  34. Lee,Y.H., Yoon,J.H.(2020). Exploring the Future Education Direction through FGI of Subjective Existences of Education and Domestic.Foreign Educational Experts. Journal of Education &Culture, 26(3), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2020.26.3.143
  35. Lee.K.W.(2015). A Study on the Coordination of National Curriculums, Korea Institute of Curriculum Evaluation.
  36. Lee.H.S., Yoo.B.K.(2020). The Effects of The Science Lesson Applying the Backward Design Model on Science Core Competency of 2015 Revised Science, Science Process Skills, and Scientific Communication Ability. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 32(1) 211-221.
  37. Shin,D.K.(2021) Sentiment Analysis as a Predictor for Scores of Persuasive Essays. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(2), 215-226.
  38. Kwon,H.K.(2019) 2019 KEDI Research on student competency, Korean Educational Development Institute.