References
- 고상숙, 고호경, 강현희 (2003). 실생활문제에서 분수의 개념적 이해. 한국학교수학회논문집, 6(2), 117-126.
- 교육부a (2019). 교사용 지도서 수학 3-2. 서울: 교육부.
- 교육부b (2019). 교사용 지도서 수학 5-2. 서울: 교육부.
- 교육부c (2019). 수학 3-2. 서울: 교육부.
- 교육부d (2019). 수학 5-2. 서울: 교육부.
- 김민경 (2009). 초등학생의 분수 이해 분석: 6학년의 분수 개념 및 분수 나눗셈을 중심으로. 한국학교수학회논문집, 12(2), 151-170.
- 김옥경 (1997). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 분수 개념 이해 및 분수 수업 방안에 대한 연구. 한국교원대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
- 박계관 (2007). 수학 학습부진 학생의 학습부진 발생 단계 분석 및 효율적인 지도방안에 관한 연구 - 중학교 1학년을 대상으로. 서울시립대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
- 박희연 (1998). 초등수학학습에서의 학습 결손 예방을 위한 가정 학습 지도 방안 연구 : 수.연산영역을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
- 임영빈 (2016). 초등수학 학습에서의 구체와 추상. 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
- Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. J ournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 447-455. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004
- Baroody, A. J. (1989) Manipulatives don't come with guarantees, Arithmetic Teacher, 37(2), pp. 4-5. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.37.2.0004
- Bruner & Kenney. (1965). Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development. Wiley, 1-75.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/math.
- Driscoll, M. J. (1983) Research within Reach: elementary school mathematics and reading. St Louis: CEMREL, Inc.
- Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M., & Meyer, J. M. (2020). Teaching Fraction Concepts Using the Concrete-Representational-Abstract Sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477.
- Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Sterba, S. K., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A., et al. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499-514. doi:10.1037/a0034341.1.
- Fuson, K. C.; & Briars, D. J. (1990). Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for firstand second-grade place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 180-206.
- Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10034-000
- Kaminski, J. A, Sloutsky, V. M, & Heckler, A. (2004). Transfer of learning between isomorphic artificial domains: Advantage for the Abstract. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3km5s4d7
- Kaminski, J. A., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2012). Representation and transfer of abstract mathematical concepts in adolescence and young adulthood. In V. F. Reyna, S. B. Chapman, M. R. Dougherty, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The adolescent brain: Learning, reasoning, and decision making (pp. 67-93). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13493-003
- Labinowicz. E. (1985). Learning from students: New beginnings for teaching numerical thinking. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. In P. W. Thompson, & D. Lambdin (1994). Research into practice : concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 556-558.
- Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201-221. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.008.
- Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action Research: Improving schools and empowering educators(5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA, Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA, Author.
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
- Resnick, I. B. & Omanson, S. F. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser(Ed.). Advances in instructional psychology(Vol. 3. pp.41-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 498-505.
- Suydam, M. N. (1986) Manipulative materials and achievement, Arithmetic Teacher, 33(6), pp. 10-32. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.33.6.0010
- Suydam, M. N., & Higgins, J. L. (1977). Activity-based learning in elementary school mathematics: Recommendations from research. Columbus, OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
- Thompson, P. W. (1992) Notations, conventions, and constraints: contributions to effective use of concrete materials in elementary mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, pp. 123-147.
- Van De Walle, J. A., Karp K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally, New York: Allyn & Bacon.