DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a hybrid online and offline program for facilitating father-infant interactions in South Korea: a quasi-experimental study

  • Park, Sae-Eun (Department of Nursing, Seojeong University) ;
  • Bang, Kyung-Sook (College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2022.03.03
  • Accepted : 2022.04.04
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the effects of an educational program for fathers on improving father-infant interactions, child-rearing knowledge, and attachment. Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, the participants were recruited by convenience sampling among fathers with infants (2-6 months of age) residing in three districts of Seoul. Fifteen participants in the experimental group and 17 participants in the control group completed the follow-up investigation. A 5-week online and offline intervention program with five sessions was provided to the experimental group. The data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Results: There was a significant difference in the change in father-infant interaction scores of the experimental group, especially in the caregiver aspect with a significance level of .100 in time and group-to-group interactions (B=6.46, p=.051, 95% confidence interval [CI]=-0.02-12.94). The changes between the groups and times were not statistically significant when it came to infant development knowledge and father-infant attachment. Conclusion: We conclude that hybrid online and offline education should be implemented as an effective method to improve fathers' interactions with their children based on accurate knowledge about infant development.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by an award for PhD students from the Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing in 2020.

References

  1. Lau R, Hutchinson A. A narrative review of parental education in preparing expectant and new fathers for early parental skills. Midwifery. 2020;84:102644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102644
  2. Shorey S, Dennis CL, Bridge S, Chong YS, Holroyd E, He HG. First-time fathers' postnatal experiences and support needs: a descriptive qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017;73(12):2987-2996. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13349
  3. Magill-Evans J, Harrison MJ, Benzies K, Gierl M, Kimak C. Effects of parenting education on first-time fathers' skills in interactions with their infants. Fathering. 2007;5(1):42-57. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0501.42
  4. Capuozzo RM, Sheppard BS, Uba G. Boot camp for new dads: the importance of infant-father attachment. Young Children. 2010;65(3):24-28.
  5. Lamb ME. How do fathers influence children's development? Let me count the ways. In: Lamb ME, editor. The role of the father in child development. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2010. p. 1-26.
  6. Crespi I, Ruspini E. Transition to fatherhood: new perspectives in the global context of changing men's identities. International Review of Sociology. 2015;25(3):353-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1078529
  7. An HS, Bang KS. Effects of newborn care education for first-time fathers on their knowledge and confidence in newborn care at postpartum one month. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2014;44(4):428-436. https://doi.org/10.4040/JKAN.2014.44.4.428
  8. Grossmann K, Grossmann KE. Essentials when studying child-father attachment: a fundamental view on safe haven and secure base phenomena. Attachment and Human Development. 2020;22(1):9-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1589056
  9. Kim E, Koh EY. Classification and characterization according to parenting attitudes, efficacy and stress of father with child. Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2019;19(7):598-618. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.7.599
  10. Barnard KE, Eyres SJ. Child health assessment. Part 2: the first year of life. Superintendent of documents. Screening/ Assessment Report. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1979 June. Report No.: DHEW-HRA-79-25.
  11. Oh HJ, Doh HS. The effects of maternal childhood attachment and paternal involvement in child-rearing and maternal parenting efficacy on parenting behavior of mothers with infants. Korean Journal of Child Studies. 2019;40(2):115-129. https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2019.40.2.115
  12. Lucassen N, Tharner A, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Volling BL, Verhulst FC, et al. The association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of Family Psychology. 2011;25(6):986-992. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025855
  13. Flynn-Bowman A. Increasing father involvement in the care of their infant using text messages: the DadRocks study [master's thesis]. St. Catharines, ONT: Brock University; 2019. p. 1-227.
  14. Kang HW, Park J. Effects of a parenting support program for parent empowerment on parenting efficacy and parent-child interactions in families of young children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice. 2011;12(1):1-25.
  15. MacPhee D. The nature of parents' experiences with and knowledge about infant development. The Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development; 1983 April 21-24; Detroit. Society for Research in Child Development: Symposium on the Cognitive Experience of Parents; 1983. p. 1-15.
  16. Kim EJ. The relationships among teachers' sensitivity, the knowledge of infant development and infants' socio-emotional competence [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2018. p. 1-67.
  17. Muller ME. The development and testing of the Muller prenatal attachment. Western Journal of Nursing Resarch. 1993;15(2):199-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599301500205
  18. Han KE. The relationship of maternal self-esteem and maternal sensitivity with mother-to-infant attachment [master's thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University; 2001. p. 1-75.
  19. Choe SU. Identification of implementation strategy by practical interpretations of significance level, significance probability, and known parameters in statistical inferences. Korea Safety Management and Science. 2012;75-80.
  20. McMillin SE, Bultas MW, Zander T, Wilmott J, Underwood S, Broom MA, et al. The role of maternal knowledge of child development in predicting risk for child maltreatment. Clinical Pediatrics. 2016;55(4):374-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922815586054
  21. Schoemaker NK, Jagersma G, Stoltenborgh M, Maras A, Vermeer HJ, Juffer F, et al. The effectiveness of video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for foster care (VIPP-FC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychology. 2018;6(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0246-z
  22. Alvarenga P, Cerezo MA, Wiese E, Piccinini CA. Effects of a short video feedback intervention on enhancing maternal sensitivity and infant development in low-income families. Attachment and Human Develoment. 2020;22(5):534-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1602660
  23. Zand DH, Braddock B, Baig W, Deasy J, Maxim R. Role of pediatricians in fostering resilience in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;163(6):1769-1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.074
  24. Groeneveld MG, Vermeer HJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Linting M. Enhancing home-based child care quality through video-feedback intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Family Psychology. 2011;25(1):86-96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022451
  25. Murphy N. Maltreatment of children with disabilities: the breaking point. Journal of Child Neurology. 2011;26(8):1054-1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073811413278
  26. Tagavi D, Koegel L, Koegel R, Vernon T. Improving conversational fluidity in young adults with autism spectrum disorder using a video-feedback intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2021;23(4):145-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720939969
  27. Kim G. Current development status of the parent education program and an analysis of the program. Journal of Parent Education. 2017;9(4):273-292.
  28. Tryphonopoulos PD, Letourneau N. Promising results from a video-feedback interaction guidance intervention for improving maternal-infant interaction quality of depressed mothers: a feasibility pilot study. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2020;52(2): 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119892769
  29. Kok M, Komen A, Van Capelleveen L, Van der Kamp J. The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a physical education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2020;25(1):49-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773
  30. Van der Asdonk S, Cyr C, Alink L. Improving parent-child interactions in maltreating families with the attachment video-feedback intervention: parental childhood trauma as a moderator of treatment effects. Attachment and Human Development. 2021;23(6):876-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2020.1799047
  31. Rempel LA, Rempel JK, Khuc TN, Vui LT. Influence of father-infant relationship on infant development: a father-involvement intervention in Vietnam. 2017;53(10):1844-1858. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000390
  32. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Juffer F. Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129(2):195-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.195
  33. Jeon Y, Gwak S, Kim J. Analysis of online involvement in parenting of mothers raising young children. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020;11(3):1779-1794. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.11.3.126