Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Types of Landscape Design Concepts through Analysis of Award-Winners for Urban Park Design Competitions

도시공원 설계공모 수상작을 통해 본 조경설계개념의 유형

  • Kim, A-Yeon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, The University of Seoul)
  • 김아연 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.08
  • Accepted : 2022.03.28
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present types of design concept based on the specificity of landscape design, and to derive a theoretical framework for the landscape design concepts by analyzing the design concepts appearing in urban park design competitions. Through literature review, five types of landscape design concepts were categorized into value and vision, analysis and interpretation, form and structure, program and element, and process and operation. Using this framework, the design concepts shown in 96 works submitted to 18 domestic and overseas urban park design competitions were analyzed. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows. First, due to the complexity of contemporary urban parks, design concepts are presented as mixtures of main concepts and secondary concepts in multiple layers. Second, it was identified that design concepts of 'form and structure' were used the most in urban park designs, followed by the 'program and element' concepts. The 'value and vision' and 'analysis and interpretive' concepts are introduced as third and fourth. Third, the reason that the 'form and structure' concept is widely used as main and secondary concepts is judged to be because the form of a space, which is the key result of the design, has an important influence on the identity of the design. Fourth, the reason that the 'program and element' concept type is widely introduced is that urban park design has a stronger planning aspect to produce programs during the design process, compared with other design fields where programs are usually given in advance. Lastly, it is difficult to see that the properties of the site solely affect the type of design concept, because a design concept is the result of a complex and creative process in which a designer subjectively interprets the objective characteristics of the site and project, and given design guidelines can affect the type of design concept.

이 연구는 조경설계의 특수성에 기반한 설계개념의 유형을 제시하고 이를 토대로 국내외 도시공원 설계공모 수상작에 나타난 설계개념을 분석하여 조경설계 개념에 대한 이론적 틀을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 문헌 연구를 통해 조경설계의 설계개념 유형을 가치와 비전, 분석과 해석, 형태와 구조, 프로그램과 요소, 과정과 운영의 다섯 가지로 유형화하고, 이 틀을 활용하여 국내외 공원설계공모 18개에 출품된 96개의 작품에 나타난 설계개념을 분석하였다. 연구 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 현대 도시공원의 복합성으로 인해 설계개념은 주개념과 보조개념의 여러 층위로 제시된다. 둘째, 도시공원 설계에 있어 형태적 개념이 가장 많이 활용되며, 그 다음으로 프로그램적 개념, 가치와 해석적 개념이 도입되는 것으로 파악되었다. 셋째, 형태적 개념이 주개념과 보조개념으로 많이 활용되는 이유는 디자인의 핵심 결과물인 공간의 형태가 설계안의 정체성에 중요한 영향을 미치기 때문으로 판단된다. 넷째, 프로그램적 개념 유형이 다음으로 많이 활용되는 이유는 불특정 다수인 이용자를 대상으로 하는 도시공원이 타 디자인 분야에 비해 프로그램을 생산하는 기획적 특성이 강하기 때문이다. 다섯째, 대상지 속성이 전적으로 설계개념 유형에 영향을 준다고 보기 어려운데 설계개념은 대상지의 객관적 속성을 설계가가 주관적으로 해석하는 복합적이며 창의적인 과정의 결과이며, 특히 설계공모의 경우 공모지침에 영향을 받을 수 있기 때문이다. 이 연구는 조경설계 과정에서 심도 있게 논의되지 않았던 설계개념을 유형화하여 설계창작 과정과 설계작품 비평에 유용한 틀로 활용될 수 있는 기반을 마련했다는데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2018년도 서울시립대학교 교내학술연구비에 의하여 지원되었음.

References

  1. An, S. H.(2017) Types of concept figuration in landscape design based on memory. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(6): 171-184. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.6.171
  2. Bae, S. H.(2007) A Study on the Indeterminate Characteristics in Contemporary Landscape Designs. Master's Thesis. University of Seoul.
  3. Baek, J. H.(2006) Analysis on imitation controversy. Environment and Landscape Architecture of Korea 222: 126-133.
  4. Balmori Associates and H Associates(2007) Flat city, link city, zero city: International master plan competition for public administration town. Environment and Landscape Architecture of Korea 227: 90-119.
  5. Bark, S. H. and J. H. Pae(2013) A critical analysis of large parks design in Korea with a perspective of contemporary design issues. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 76: 65-80. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2013.76..005
  6. Berrizbeitia, A.(2007) Re-placing process. In Czerniak, J. and Hargreaves, G., eds., Large Parks. New York: Princeton Architectural Press pp. 87-120.
  7. Chin, Y.(2013) Some Thoughts From the Outdoors. Paju: Jokyung.
  8. Cho, H. K.(2016) Queen Hur memorial park design competition, India. Landscape Architecture Korea 344: 70-83.
  9. Choi, J. M.(2008) The era of landscape design competition, design behind design. In Landscape Architectural Critic BOM, ed., Landscape Architecture in the Era of Design Competition. Paju: Jokyung. pp. 10-25.
  10. Czerniak, J.(2001) Appearance, Performance: Landscape at Downsview. In Czerniak, J., ed., Downsview Park Torono. Munich: Prestel Verlag. pp. 12-23.
  11. Heo, J. H.(2015) Analysis of the Changing Process of Urban Park Programs: The Case of Seoul Forest Park. Master's Thesis. University of Seoul.
  12. Jang, J. H., D. Y. Kim, M. J. Shin and J. H. Shin(2017) The influence of park users' cognition about the park design concept and strategy to satisfaction: A case study of the neighborhood parks of Gwanggyo New Town. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(1): 82-93. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.1.082
  13. Jeong, W. J.(2005) The highline open space design competition. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 205: 122-128.
  14. Jeong, W. J.(2009) Studio101, story of landscape design: Program is air. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 253: 160-165.
  15. Joo, S. H. and Y. H. Kim(2010) The cognition of design concepts for urban parks: The cases of Seoul forest, Yeouido Park, and Seonyudo Park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(5): 53-63.
  16. Kim, A. Y.(2009) Studio101, story of landscape design: Design concept, from volatile to tactile. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 253: 172-177.
  17. Kim, A. Y.(2010) Students' perception of landscape design studio education. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(2): 9-24.
  18. Kim, A. Y.(2020) Landscape design as a process of realization of imagination. In My First Landscape Architecture. Seoul: Ilchokak. pp. 206-235.
  19. Kim, M.(2016) Pershing square renew. Landscape Architecture Korea 339: 62-87.
  20. Kim, Y. D.(1999) Understanding Landscape Design. In Introduction to Landscape Architecture. Seoul: Kimoondang.
  21. Kim, Y. M.(2009a) Competition review: Master plan design competition for Shelby Farms Park. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 251: 148-157.
  22. Kim, Y. M.(2009b) Competition review: Lower Don Lands innovative design competition. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 253: 142-151.
  23. Kim, Y. M.(2009c) Competition review: Orange County Great Park design competition. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 255: 138-149.
  24. Ku, B. D.(2006a) A study on the type and characteristics of the architectural design concept. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 22(5): 65-72.
  25. Ku, B. D.(2006b) A study on the development and transformation process of the architectural design concept in the studio works. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 22(5): 73-80.
  26. Ku, B. D.(2006c) A study on the influence of the site conditions to the formulation of the architectural design concepts in the studio works. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 22(8): 73-80.
  27. Ku, B. D.(2013) A study on the students' way of analogical thinking in concept formulation & form-generating process. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 29(10): 31-38.
  28. LaGro, J.(2013) Site Analysis: Informing Context-Sensitive and Sustainable Site Planning and Design. (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  29. Lee, H. J.(2014) International competition for rehabilitation of Mapo oil depot into a cultural depot park. Landscape Architecture Korea 318: 54-73.
  30. Lee, J. H. and S. H. Cho(2013) An analysis on the problems of design competition process of landscape architecture by the Delphi analysis method. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(3): 83-93. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.3.083
  31. Lee, J. H. and Y. M. Kim(2020) The meaning of landscape architecture through its values and changes. In My First Landscape Architecture. Seoul: Ilchokak. pp. 20-55.
  32. Lee, J. M.(2006) A study on the definition and the roles of design theme and design concept through the stage of architectural concept design. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 22(8): 3-10.
  33. Lee, S. M.(2013) Double Blades of Site Specific Design. In Pae, J. H., ed., Yongsan Park: Yongsan Park International Design Competition Critic. Goyang: Namudosi. pp. 170-179.
  34. Lynch, K. and G. Hack(1984) Site Planning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  35. North, A.(2012) Processing Downsview Park: Transforming a theoretical diagram to master plan and construction reality. Journal of Landscape Architecture 7(1): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2012.693777
  36. Pae, J. H.(2004) Theory and Critical Practice in Contemporary Landscape Architecture. Seongnam: Jokyung.
  37. Pae, J. H.(2009) The bridle of the park: Reading the international design competition for Gwanggyo lakeside park. Environtment and Landscape Architecture of Korea 249: 132-135.
  38. Pae, J. H.(2013) Yongsan Park, its discouse and design. In Pae, J. H., ed., Yongsan Park: Yongsan Park International Design Competition Critic. Goyang: Namudosi. pp. 14-33.
  39. Park, K. H. and J. H. Pae(2008) Design strategies of large park in the international design competition for central open space in multi-functional administrative City, Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(5): 1-25.
  40. Parthenois, P.(2005) Conceptual Design for Architects. Doctor of Design Dissertation. Harvard University.
  41. Reid, G. W.(2007) From Concept to Form in Landscape Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  42. Ryu, I. W.(2008) An analysis of the design concepts applied in medical & welfare facilities of the architectural competition works. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 10(2): 57-64.
  43. Sharky, B.(2016) Thinking about Landscape Architecture: Principles of a Design Profession for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.
  44. Shih, C. M.(2004) Between concept and form, learning from case studies. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 3(1): 217-221. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.3.217
  45. So, J., J. S. Sung and J. H. Pae(2013) An analysis of process-oriented design in the invited entries of international competition for the master plan of the Yongsan Park, Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(2): 11-26. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.2.011
  46. White, E. T.(1975) Concept Source Book: A vocabulary of Architectural Forms. Tucson: Architectural Media.
  47. Wi, J. S.(2001) A Study on Korean Contemporary Park Design Trends: In the Case of Park Competition Works of the 1990s. Master's Thesis. Seoul National University.
  48. Yoon, H. Y.(2009) The Highline section 1. Environment & Landscape Architecture of Korea 255: 58-71.
  49. Zoh, K.(2000) Paranoia: The obsession of the meaning of the contemporary Korean landscape design. LOCUS 2: 131-147.
  50. National Institute of Korean Language(2021) Korean Standard Dictionary. Available at: https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do [Accessed December, 2021].