DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Communicative Model of Educational Transformations in the Realities of (Post) Modernity

  • Opanasyk, Oksana (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art) ;
  • Popova, Yana (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art) ;
  • Matiiv, Ihor (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art) ;
  • Radenko, Yuliia (Cinema and Television Arts Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts) ;
  • Mozharovska, Hanna (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art)
  • Received : 2022.03.05
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

In the context of the pandemic, educational institutions had to ensure an instant transition to remote technological models of communication within the new conditions of the educational environment. The purpose of the academic paper lies in determining the role of the communicative model of educational transformations in the realities of (post) modernity. The research methodology is based on a survey of 120 students from 10 higher educational institutions (HEIs) of Ukraine through an online form regarding the importance of live communication during a pandemic. Results. The communicative model changed significantly during the pandemic - the interaction was mainly due to technologies. The research has identified four communication models of educational transformations under the conditions of the pandemic, depending on learning models. The first traditional model of distance learning involves distance learning; the second model involves contact remote training using remote educational technologies; the third model is blended learning, which combines remote and traditional learning formats, synchronous and asynchronous modes of interaction; the fourth model is traditional contact training. The empirical study of the effectiveness of communication models proves that live communication remains extremely important for learning and understanding of educational materials by students, and technology has provided support for such communication. Along with this, seminars and video lectures with presentations combining live communication and communication technologies are as important as digital learning tools. The most effective teaching method for mastering and memorizing educational material was a live dialogue with a teacher at seminars in ZOOM, followed by individual written assignments on the studied topic.

Keywords

References

  1. Brammer, S., & Clark, T. (2020). COVID-19 and management education: Reflections on challenges, opportunities, and potential futures. British journal of Management, 31(3), 453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12425
  2. Byrnes, K. G., Kiely, P. A., Dunne, C. P., McDermott, K. W., & Coffey, J. C. (2021). Communication, collaboration and contagion:"Virtualisation" of anatomy during COVID-19. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23649
  3. Chatterjee, I., & Chakraborty, P. (2021). Use of information communication technology by medical educators amid covid-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(3), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520966996
  4. Dost, S., Hossain, A., Shehab, M., Abdelwahed, A., & Al-Nusair, L. (2020). Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ open, 10(11), e042378 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378
  5. Fatonia, N. A., Nurkhayatic, E., Nurdiawatid, E., Fidziahe, G. P., Adhag, S., Irawanh, A. P., ... & Azizik, E. (2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576
  6. Fatonia, N. A., Nurkhayatic, E., Nurdiawatid, E., Fidziahe, G. P., Adhag, S., Irawanh, A. P., ... & Azizik, E. (2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576
  7. Franchi, T. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: A student's perspective. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(3), 312 https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1966
  8. Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25
  9. Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 375-382). IGI Global
  10. Hidayat, D., & Wibawa, D. (2020). Crisis management and communication experience in education during the covid-19 pandemic in indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3).
  11. Lyons, K. M., Christopoulos, A., & Brock, T. P. (2020). Sustainable pharmacy education in the time of COVID-19. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(6).
  12. Masalimova, A. R., Ryazanova, E. L., Tararina, L. I., Sokolova, E. G., Ikrennikova, Y. B., Efimushkina, S. V., & Shulga, T. I. (2021). Distance Learning Hybrid Format for University Students in Post-Pandemic Perspective: Collaborative Technologies Aspect. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 389-395 https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5536
  13. McCarthy, B., O'Donovan, M., & Trace, A. (2021). A new therapeutic communication model "TAGEET" to help nurses engage therapeutically with patients suspected of or confirmed with COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(7-8), 1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15609
  14. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students' perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
  15. Nguyen, M. H., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717
  16. Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011
  17. Quezada, R. L., Talbot, C., & Quezada-Parker, K. B. (2020). From bricks and mortar to remote teaching: A teacher education program's response to COVID-19. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 472-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1801330
  18. Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, V. S., & Saravanakumar, A. R. (2020). E-Learning during lockdown of Covid-19 pandemic: A global perspective. International journal of control and automation, 13(4), 1088-1099
  19. Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
  20. Taragin-Zeller, L., Rozenblum, Y., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Public engagement with science among religious minorities: lessons from COVID-19. Science Communication, 42(5), 643-678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020962107
  21. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action International Commission on the Futures of Education. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/education_in_a_post-covid_world-nine_ideas_for_public_action.pdf
  22. Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Eva, D., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student's responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 5(1), 141-153
  23. Yekefallah, L., Namdar, P., Panahi, R., & Dehghankar, L. (2021). Factors related to students' satisfaction with holding e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic based on the dimensions of e-learning. Heliyon, 7(7), e07628 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07628