Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회지)

Korean Society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of evaluation criteria for dental hygiene intra-school clinical practice operation using CIPP evaluation model

CIPP 평가모형을 활용한 치위생과 교내임상실습 운영 평가기준 개발

  • Jang, Mi-Hwa (Department of Dental Hygiene, Suwon Women's University)
  • Received : 2022.02.11
  • Accepted : 2022.03.14
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop operation management evaluation standards for efficient operation of practical courses conducted on campus and to verify validity and reliability. Methods: The draft evaluation criteria of this study were derived based on the CIPP program evaluation model, in order to verify the validity of the content, the Delphi survey was conducted targeting 30 dental hygiene professors and clinical field dental hygienists who had been in charge of practical education for more than 5 years. Main survey was conducted with 252 professors and clinical field dental hygienists in charge of practical education. Results: Through exploratory factor analysis, a total of 36 questions were confirmed with 7 factors. As a result of verifying the internal consistency of the final evaluation criteria, the degree of internal fit of the items in the entire domain was 0.914. Conclusions: According to the above results, the validity and reliability of the evaluation criteria for evaluating the operation and management of in-school clinical practice were verified to be appropriate, and it is thought that it can be used in follow-up studies related to the operation and management of the practice course in the future.

연구목적: 본 연구는 교내에서 실시하는 임상실습의 효율적인 운영을 위한 운영관리 평가기준을 개발하고 타당성과 신뢰성을 검증하였다. 연구방법: 본 연구의 평가기준 초안은 CIPP 프로그램 평가모형을 기반으로 도출하였으며, 내용의 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 5년 이상 임상실습 교육을 담당했던 치위생과 교수 및 임상현장 치과위생사 30명을 대상으로 델파이 조사를 실시하였으며, 실기교육을 담당하는 교수 및 임상현장 치과위생사 252명을 대상으로 본 조사를 실시하였다. 연구결과: 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 7개 요인으로 총 36문항을 확인하였으며 최종 평가 기준의 내적 일관성을 확인한 결과 내적 적합도는 0.914였다. 결론: 이상의 결과에 따라 교내 임상실습의 운영 및 관리를 평가하기 위한 평가기준의 타당성과 신뢰성이 적절함을 확인하였으며, 향후 이에 관련된 후속 연구에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park IS, Song GS. Effect of cooperative learning on learning strategies, academic self - efficacy and class satisfaction among dental hygiene students. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012;12(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.1.093
  2. Mann NK, Sellers PA. Survey for teaching patient education in the dental hygiene curriculum. J Dent Hyg 2003;77(3):168-72.
  3. Hwang GH, Kim KJ, Ohn JD, Chun YY. Exploring the meaning of total quality management of curriculum and its implications. J Educ Stud 2013;44(4):99-121.
  4. Korea Dental Hygiene Education and Evaluation Institute Establishment Promotion Committee. Public hearing for establishment of dentalhygiene education evaluation and certification system. Korean Dental Hygienists Association 2017.
  5. Stufflebeam DL. The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational account ability. J Res and Development in Educ(JRDE) 1971;5(1):19-25.
  6. Bae HS. Theory - driven educational program evaluation. Seoul: Wonmisa; 2008: 1-163.
  7. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995;7(3):286-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
  8. Shin YJ, Kim ST, Song HD. Development of evaluation indicators for job capability strengthening program for vocational high school with application of CIPP evaluation model. J Vocational Educ Res 2018;37(3):1-23. https://doi.org/10.37210/JVER.2018.37.3.1
  9. Kwon JS, Kim HY, Yune SJ. Developing Korean LID program assessment criterion based on CIPP evaluation model. JOEC 2019;25(4):51-72. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.4.51
  10. Cha BE, Shon MH. A study on the development of evaluation indicators for the education process in medical school. JOEC 2019;25(4):239-61. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2019.25.4.239
  11. Bae GM, Wu HJ, Choi ML, Yoon GS. Diagnosis and improvements plan study of CIPP model - based vocational competency development training teacher qualification training. J Vocational Educ Res 2017;36(2):1-27. https://doi.org/10.37210/JVER.2017.36.2.51
  12. Yun MH, Kim JW, Kim HH, Park SS. Evaluation of industry-university cooperation internship programs. J Vocational Educ Res 2006;25(3):183-206.
  13. Kang JN, Park KO, Chang YJ. Development of evaluation indicators on hospice and palliative care curriculum using delphi methods. KJHRDQ 2013;15(1):107-34. https://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.1.005
  14. Jang MH, Kim JH. Influencing factors on attitude, stress and satisfaction in clinical practice. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014;14(3):407-15. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.03.407
  15. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;5(6):382-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  16. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28(4):563-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  17. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010: 91-146.
  18. Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. In: discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage; 2013: 670-8.
  19. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974;39(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  20. Uysal MS, Sirakaya - Turk E. Factor analytical procedure and scale reliability. Boston: CABI; 2017: 320-38.
  21. Taichman RS, Green TG, Polverini PJ. Creation of a scholars program in dental leadership(SPDL) for dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ 2009;73(10):1139-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2009.73.10.tb04805.x
  22. Sim SJ, Back HO, Um JS, Jung HY, Ji HM, Hwang SN, et al. The factors to impact on the satisfaction of field practice among dental hygiene students. J Kor Acad Dent Admin 2017;5(1):22-30. https://doi.org/10.22671/JKADA.2017.5.1.22
  23. Lee YS. Effects of problem - based instruction on learning attitude and academic achievement by learner's cognitive style attitude[Master's thesis]. Chungju: Univ. of Education Chungju National, 2002.
  24. Kim ME. Cognitive and affective domains outcome of students in the department of dental hygiene according to teaching and learning methods by learning style. Jour of KoCon.a 2021;21(1):363-72. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.01.363