디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.353-366
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 전환 시대: 정부지원, 네트워크 역량과 지식공유가 혁신행동을 거쳐 혁신성과에 미치는 영향

In the era of Digital Transformation: The Effect of Government Support, Network capability and Knowledge Sharing on Innovation Performance through Innovative Behavior

  • 최규선 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 현병환 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.22
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 정부지원, 네트워크 역량과 지식공유가 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 혁신행동이 매개하는 효과의 영향 관계를 살펴보고자 하였다. 코로나 확산일로의 시기로 디지털 기반의 네트워크와 지식공유 활동이 빠르게 범용화된 가운데 법인기업 재직자를 대상으로 357부의 설문을 분석하여 SPSS 버전 24와 smart PLS 3를 활용하여 연구가설을 검증하였다. 연구결과 정부지원, 네트워크 역량, 지식공유가 증가하면 혁신성과도 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 혁신행동은 네트워크 역량, 지식공유와 혁신성과 사이의 관계를 유의미하게 매개하는 것으로 나타났고, 정부지원은 네트워크 역량에 있어 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 혁신성과 창출에 있어서 중요한 혁신행동 유발을 위해 기업인들의 네트워크 역량을 제고하고 지식공유 활성화를 위한 다양한 프로그램을 정부 지원정책으로 제시하여야 하겠다. 이는 곧 기업인들이 자발적으로 더욱 유연하고 자유롭게 아이디어를 개발하고 실행할 수 있도록 하는 동인이 되어 줌으로써 기업과 산업의 혁신성장으로 경쟁력을 높이는 계기가 되어줄 것이다. 즉, 본 연구는 지식공유 활동과 함께 혁신행동을 야기하여 혁신성과 창출에 도움을 주는 네트워크 역량에 있어서의 정부지원의 효과성을 검증하고 전체적인 구조상에서 종합적으로 요인들 간 관계성을 실증하였다.

The study sets out to examine the relationship between the effects of government support, network capability, and knowledge sharing on the effects of innovative behavior on innovation performance. As digital-based networks and knowledge sharing activities are rapidly becoming common in the era of the spread of Covid-19, 357 questionnaires were analyzed for incumbent employees and the research hypotheses are verified using SPSS 24 and smart PLS 3 to prove the relationships between variables. As a result of the study, it is found that innovation performance increased when government support, network capability, and knowledge sharing increased. Innovative behavior is found to significantly mediate the relationship between network capability, knowledge sharing, and innovation performance, and government support was found to have a significant effect on network capabiltiy. Therefore, in order to induce innovative actions that are important in creating innovative results, various programs to enhance the network capabilities of entrepreneurs and promote knowledge sharing should be required as government support policies. This will serve as a driving force for entrepreneurs to voluntarily develop and implement ideas more flexibly and freely, thereby enhancing competitiveness through innovative growth of companies and industries. In other words, this study verified the effectiveness of government support in the network capability to help create innovative results by inducing innovative behavior along with knowledge sharing activities, and comprehensively demonstrated the relationship between factors in the overall structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kumar, S. A., Bawge, G., & Kumar, B. V. (2020). An Overview of Industrial Revolution and Technology of Industrial 4.0. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, 9, 64-71
  2. Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Klein, M. (2021). Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120656
  3. Goodell, J. W. (2020). COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101512 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512
  4. Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2021). Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 Era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120712
  5. Alonso, A. D., Kok, S. K., Bressan, A., O'Shea, M., Sakellarios, N., Koresis, A., ... & Santoni, L. J. (2020). COVID-19, aftermath, impacts, and hospitality firms: An international perspective. International journal of hospitality management, 91, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102654
  6. Dopfer, M., Fallahi, S., Kirchberger, M., & Gassmann, O. (2017). Adapt and strive: How ventures under resource constraints create value through business model adaptations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12218
  7. Penarroya-Farell, M., & Miralles, F. (2021). Business model dynamics from interaction with open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010081
  8. Coviello, N.E. & Munro, H.J. (1995). 'Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development', European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp.49-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569510095008
  9. Gjellerup, P. (2000). 'SME support services in the face of globalization', Concerted Action Seminar, Opening Address, Conference Proceedings, Danish Agency for Trade and Industry, Copenhagen, pp.16-28.
  10. Ruzzier, M., Hisrich, R. and Antonic, B. (2006). 'SME internationalization research: past, present, and future', Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.476-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000610705705
  11. Schweizer, R., Vahlne, J. and Johanson, J. (2010). 'Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process', Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.343-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0064-8
  12. Child, J., Hsieh, L., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., Tsai, T., Narooz, R. and Zhang, Y. (2017). 'SME international business models: the role of context and experience', Journal of World Business, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp.664-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.004
  13. Coviello, N. (2006). 'The network dynamics of international new ventures', Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp.713-731. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400219
  14. Knight, G.A. & Cavusgil, S.T. (2004). 'Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the bornglobal firm', Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.124-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071
  15. Bonakdar, A., Frankenberger, K. and Gassmann, O. (2014). 'Intra-firm networks and novelty-centered business models', in Academy of Management Proceedings, No. 1, p.17700, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
  16. Acquaah, M. (2012). Social networking relationships, firm-specific managerial experience and firm performance in a transition economy: A comparative analysis of family owned and nonfamily firms. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1215-1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1973
  17. D. C. Seol & C. W. Park. (2020). A Study on the Factors Influencing Technology Innovation Capability on the Knowledge Management Performance of the Company: Focused on Government Small and Medium Venture Business R&D Business, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.15.4.202008.193
  18. Fang, G., Ma, X., Ren, L., & Zhou, Q.. (2014). Antecedents of Network Capability and Their Effects on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test of Hi tech Firms in China. Creativity and innovation Management, 23(4), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12083
  19. N. G. Park, M. S. Kim, & J. W. Ko. (2015). The Effect of the Governments Entrepreneurial Support Policy on Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Intention. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 10(6), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.10.6.201512.89
  20. Y. B. Ahn, Y. S. Kim, & S. Y. Kim. (2021). A Study on the Influence of Government Support on Corporate Ability and Opportunist Behavior: Focusing on Socially Disadvantaged Business. JOURNAL OF THE KOREA CONTENTS ASSOCIATION, 21(10), 378-387. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.10.378
  21. H. Chang. (2016). "An Analysis on the Effect of Government Supports for the R&D of SMEs: Focused on Technical, Economic, and Social Outcomes," Korean Society and Public Administration, 26(4), pp.195-218.
  22. Kim. M. C. and Sung. N. I. (2012). "Regular Papers : Government R&D Subsidies and the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 34 (1), pp.39-60.
  23. J. K. Shin. & Y. A. Choi. (2008). "R&D Intensity and Innovation in the SMEs - The Moderating Effects of Policy Supports -," Korean Corporation Management Review, 26, pp.119-132. https://doi.org/10.21052/kcmr.2019.26.5.07
  24. Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Learn how valuable knowledge is acquired, created, bought and bartered. The Australian Library Journal, 47(3), 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1998.10755852
  25. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00054-0
  26. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  27. Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171103
  28. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
  29. Hinds, P. J., Patterson, M., & Pfeffer, J. (2001). Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of applied psychology, 86(6), 1232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232
  30. Jackson, S. E., Chuang, C. H., Harden, E. E., & Jiang, Y. (2006). Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  31. Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The international journal of human resource management, 16(5), 720-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020
  32. Arthur, J. B., & Huntley, C. L. (2005). Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1159-1170. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573115
  33. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794671
  34. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 535. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
  35. Chandra, S., Shirish, A., Srivastava, S.C. (2020). Theorizing technological spatial intrusion for ICT enabled employee innovation: the mediating role of perceived usefulness. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 161, 120320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120320
  36. Savic, D. (2020). COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce. Grey Journal (TGJ), 16(2), 101-104.
  37. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of manpower. Vol. 28 No. 3/4, pp. 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272
  38. Luo, C., Lan, Y., & Luo, X., Li, H. (2021). The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: an empirical study of virtual communities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 163, 120438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120438
  39. Li, Z., Zhang, M., & Zhang, H. (2021). Firm Growth Performance and Relative Innovation Orientation of Exploration vs Exploitation: Moderating Effects of Cluster Relationships. Management and Organization Review, 17(1), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.35
  40. Montani, F., Torres, C., Ferreira, M. C., Mendonca, H., Silva, A. J., Courcy, F., & Dagenais-Desmarais, V. (2021). Self-image goals, compassionate goals and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support for innovation across countries. Journal of Business Research, 137, 588-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.072
  41. De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2016). Perceptions of adverse work conditions and innovative behavior: The buffering roles of relational resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 515-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12121
  42. Newman, A., Herman, H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees' creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001
  43. J. B. Paine, & D. W. Organ. (2000). "The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: Some preliminary conceptual and empirical observation". Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.
  44. D. Kim, J. Shin, M. G. Seo, & M. J. Sung. (2021). Enjoy the pain that you cannot avoid: Investigation on the relationship between developmental job experience and employees' innovative behavior. Journal of Business Research, 126, 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.064
  45. Janssen, O. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.238
  46. Chen, L., Ruan, R., & He, P. (2022). The double-edged sword: A work regulatory focus perspective on the relationship between organizational identification and innovative behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12482
  47. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of management journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
  48. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  49. Cerne, M., Nerstad, C. G., & Skerlavaj, M. (2012). Don't come around here no more: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate and creativity. In Academy of Management Proceedings. Vol. 2012, No. 1, p.12222. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  50. Y. Ko, & T. Yoo. (2022). The mediation effects of knowledge hiding motivations between knowledge requester's psychological entitlement and knowledge hiding and the moderated mediation effect of supervisor monitoring. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 35(1), 29-63. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v35i1.29-63
  51. Frishammar, J. and Ake Horte, S. (2005), "Managing External Information in Manufacturing Firms: The Impact on Innovation Performance," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00121.x
  52. M. S. Kim & M. S. Lee. (2019). The Effect of Open Innovation Activities on the Performance: Focused on Technology-based Start-up Companies in Busan Area. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business. 32(6), 2417-2439 https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2019.12.32.6.2417
  53. H. H. Kang, Y. W. Seo (2020). A Study on the Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Strategic Orientation on the Performance of Technological Innovation: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity. 15(3), 99-130. https://doi.org/10.24878/TKES.2020.15.3.99
  54. H. S. Kwon, & Y. H. Han (2020). A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, Customer Orientation, and Innovative Behavior Perceived by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises' Members: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Korean Business Education Review, 35(3), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2020.35.3.181
  55. W. Ko, S. Y. Oh, & M. J. Shin. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation Support Climate and Innovative Behavior. Korean Business Education Review, 35(2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2020.35.2.187
  56. K. S. Kim & E. H. Seo. (2021). Analysis of Design Management Status of Domestic SMEs: Focused on CEO Design Leadership and Design Management Capabilities. Korean Jouranl of Business Administration. 34(6), 951-975.
  57. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44. pp.82-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
  58. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital, Administrative Science Quarterly. 42. pp.339-365. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923
  59. Zaheer, A. and Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes and performance. Strategic Management journal. 26. pp.809-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482
  60. J. H. Ryu, J. J. Kim & B. C. Lee. (2015). The impact of social network structure on innovative behavior and job performance - A case of employees in travel agency-. Journal of Tourism Management Research. 19(1), 107-127.
  61. Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 1079-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003
  62. Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1993). The network paradigm: new departures in corporate and regional development. Environment and planning D: Society and space, 11(5), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1068/d110543
  63. K. K. Chun & C. S. Suh. (2005). A Study on the Establishment of Regional Innovation Networks- The Case of Technological Innovation Network of Daegu-Gyeongbuk Region-. Journal of The Korean Regional Development. 17(4), 101-134.
  64. Grabher, G. (1993). Rediscovering the social in the economics of inter-firm relations. The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks, 1-31.
  65. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1995). "Knowledge, market failure and the multinational enterprise: A reply", Journal of International Business Studies, pp.417-426. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490182
  66. K. H. Kang & M. J. Kim. (2019). The impact of social network structure on innovative behavior and job performance - A case of employees in travel agency-. Journal of Tourism Management Research. 33(6), 229-258.
  67. H. H. Kang. (2021). A study on the effects of small and medium-sized enterprises' IT support on innovation behavior through knowledge management activities. Doctoral Thesis Daejeon University Graduate School, 2021.
  68. W C, Zhang. M. J. Kim. (2019). The Effects of External Focus Culture and Knowledge Sharing on Innovative Behavior - Focused on the Moderating Effect of Korea and China -. Journal of Korea Culture Industry. 19(2), 27-36
  69. Chen, L., Li, M., Wu, Y. J., & Chen, C. (2020). The voicer's reactions to voice: an examination of employee voice on perceived organizational status and subsequent innovative behavior in the workplace. Personnel Review.
  70. Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017
  71. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  72. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
  73. Y. M. Suh, & B. H. Hyun. (2019). A Study on Performance Creation through Open Innovation with Corporate Environments. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(12), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.12.081
  74. Y. M. Suh, & B. H. Hyun. (2019). A study on The Organizational Characteristics of SMEs on Market Performance through the Acceptance of Open Innovation -Focused on Woman's SMEs-. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(11), 131-141.