토지주택연구 (Land and Housing Review)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.85-98
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2093-8829(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1765(eISSN)
한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원 (Land and Housing Research Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of the Survey Method of the Korean National Household Travel Survey: Focusing on the Comparison of International Cases

  • Gim, Tae-Hyoung Tommy (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, and Environmental Planning Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyung-Wook (City Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Hyun (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hee (City Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Bayarsaikhan, Tsolmon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Joo, Hee-Soo (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.21
  • 심사 : 2022.04.12
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

통행을 포착할 수 있는 자료가 양적으로 방대해지며 가구통행실태조사와 같은 전통적 교통조사에 대한 무용론이 제기되고 있다. 그러나 통행의 목적과 수단을 파악할 수 있는 등 가구통행실태조사는 그 중요성이 여전하다. 이에 본 연구는 국내외 교통조사 사례 및 관련 문헌을 검토하여 가구통행실태조사의 현황을 파악하고 개선방안을 논의한다. 본 연구는 가구통행실태조사가 직면한 한계점 중 긴 조사주기, 짧은 조사기간, 유효표출률의 감소, 의무통행 중심의 문항 구성에 대해 다룬다. 이에 대한 개선방안으로 조사주기 단축, 연중조사 시행, 주중조사와 주말조사의 병행 시행, 주말통행 관련 항목 세분화 등을 제안한다. 본 연구는 교통분야 외에 관광, 보건, 사회 등의 분야에서도 응용할 수 있도록 확장성을 감안하며, 제약된 예산 하에서 현실적인 개선방안을 고려한다는 데에 의의가 있다.

The increasing use of various types of data to capture travel behavior relatively discredits the utility of traditional national-scale household travel surveys. However, the surveys are still arguably meaningful in their clarification of purposes and means of travel. Accordingly, this study reviews travel survey cases and related literature, to identify the status of the Korean National Household Travel Survey (KNHTS). It discusses improving the KNHTS's survey method, focusing on its long investigation cycle, short survey period, reduction in sample size, and questionnaire format biased toward mandatory travel. To address these issues, this study suggests reducing the survey cycle, conducting a year-round survey, combining weekday and weekend surveys, and specifying items on nonmandatory travel. These practical suggestions duly consider the validity and reliability of the KNHTS within budget constraints and its applicability to related fields, such as tourism, public health, and sociology.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1C1B1007433).

참고문헌

  1. Caceres, N., J.P. Wideberg and F.G. Benitez (2007), "Deriving Origin-Destination Data from a Mobile Phone Network", IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 1(1): 15~26. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its:20060020
  2. Chen, C., J. Ma, Y. Susilo, Y. Liu and M. Wang (2016), "The Promises of Big Data and Small Data for Travel Behavior (Aka Human Mobility) Analysis", Transportation Research Part C, 68: 285~299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.005
  3. Ewing, R. and R. Cervero (2010), "Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis", Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3): 265~294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
  4. Forsyth, A., J.M. Oakes, K.H. Schmitz and M. Hearst (2007), "Does Residential Density Increase Walking and Other Physical Activity?", Urban Studies, 44(4): 679~697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184729
  5. Gim, T.-H.T. (2016), "Testing the Reciprocal Relationship between Attitudes and Land Use in Relation to Trip Frequencies: A Nonrecursive Model", International Regional Science Review, 39(2): 203~227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017613512651
  6. Gim, T.-H.T. (2018), "Land Use, Travel Utility, and Travel Behavior: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Positive Utility of Travel", Papers in Regional Science, 97: S169~S192.
  7. Han, S. (2015), Transport Monthly 2015-5, Sejong, Korea: Korea Transport Institute.
  8. Handy, S.L. (2005), "Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence: Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity", TRB Special Report, 282.
  9. Jang, Y.J. (2015), "An Analysis of the Behavioral Characteristics of Leisure Mobility on Household Life Cycles: A Focus on the Choice of Leisure Destination at Residences", International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 29(8): 111~123.
  10. Kim, S. (2015), Revising Statistical Indicators of the Traffic Survey for Pedestrian Policy Design, Seoul, Korea: Seoul Institute.
  11. Korea Transport Institute (2011), 2010 National Passenger O/D Survey, Goyang, Korea: Korea Transport Institute.
  12. Korea Transport Institute (2016), 2016 National Passenger O/D Survey, Sejong, Korea: Korea Transport Institute.
  13. Litman, T. (2011), Short and Sweet: Analysis of Shorter Trips Using National Personal Travel Survey Data, Victoria, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  14. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2007), Report of the 2006 Capital Region Household Travel Survey, Seoul, Korea: Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
  15. Mokhtarian, P. (2018), "Why Travel Surveys Matter in the Age of Big Data?", Transportation Research Circular, E-C238: 2~4.
  16. Mokhtarian, P.L. and I. Salomon (2001), "How Derived Is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations", Transportation Research Part A, 35(8): 695~719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6
  17. Nam, K., T. Heo and G. Park (2013), Final Report of a Research Project on National Travel Surveys 2013 Regular Statistics Quality Monitoring, Daejeon, Korea: Statistics Korea.
  18. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (2017), 2013-2017 Travel Decision Survey Data Analysis and Comparison Report, San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.
  19. Seoul Metropolitan Government (1997), Seoul Transportation Census and Database Construction (National Household Travel Survey), Seoul, Korea: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  20. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2003), 2002 Seoul Household Travel Survey: Household Travel Survey and OD Construction, Seoul, Korea: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  21. Stopher, P., Y. Zhang, J. Armoogum and J.L. Madre (2011), "National Household Travel Surveys: The Case for Australia", 34th Australasian Transport Research Forum.
  22. Tolouei, R., S. Psarras and R. Prince (2017), "Origin-Destination Trip Matrix Development: Conventional Methods Versus Mobile Phone Data", Transportation Research Procedia, 26: 39~52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.07.007
  23. Travel Model Improvement Program (2013), Household Surveys at a Glance, Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  24. Federal Ministry of Transport, "Mobility in Germany (MiD)", Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.infas.eu/projects/infas-project/mobility-in-germany-mid/
  25. New Zealand Ministry of Transport, "New Zealand Household Travel Survey", Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.transport.govt.nz/
  26. U.K. Department for Transport, "National Travel Survey 2017 Report", Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-travel-survey-statistics
  27. U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, "National Travel Survey 2017 Report", Accessed February 20, 2022. https://www.bts.gov/
  28. Wilhelm, J. and N. Mcguckin (2018), "Rethinking the Survey Part of the NHTS", Transportation Research Circular, E-C238: 70~71.