DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Affording Emotional Regulation of Distant Collaborative Argumentation-Based Learning at University

  • POLO, Claire (Lyon 2 University, Education, Cultures, Politiques (ECP) Laboratory) ;
  • SIMONIAN, Stephane (Lyon 2 University, Education, Cultures, Politiques (ECP) Laboratory) ;
  • CHAKER, Rawad (Lyon 2 University, Education, Cultures, Politiques (ECP) Laboratory)
  • Received : 2022.03.04
  • Accepted : 2022.04.08
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

We study emotion regulation in a distant CABLe (Collaborative Argumentation Based-Learning) setting at university. We analyze how students achieve the group task of synthesizing the literature on a topic through scientific argumentation on the institutional Moodle's forum. Distinguishing anticipatory from reactive emotional regulation shows how essential it is to establish and maintain a constructive working climate in order to make the best out of disagreement both on social and cognitive planes. We operationalize the analysis of anticipatory emotional regulation through an analytical grid applied to the data of two groups of students facing similar disagreement. Thanks to sharp anticipatory regulation, group 1 solved the conflict both on the social and the cognitive plane, while group 2 had to call out for external regulation by the teacher, stuck in a cyclically resurfacing dispute. While the institutional digital environment did afford anticipatory emotional regulation, reactive emotional regulation rather occurred through complementary informal and synchronous communication tools. Based on these qualitative case studies, we draw recommendations for fostering distant CABLe at university.

Keywords

References

  1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M. J., & Suthers, D. D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. J. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 1-25). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Bakhtiar, A., Webster, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2018). Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 57-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9178-x
  3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1988). Politeness. Cambridge University. Press.
  4. Bunt, H. (2011). Multifunctionality in dialogue. Computer Speech & Language, 25(2), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2010.04.006
  5. Cohen, J., (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  6. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
  7. Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65.
  8. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to human perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Hadwin, A. F., Jarvela, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (2nd ed., pp. 83-106). Routledge.
  10. Isohatala, J., Naykki, P., & Jarvela, S. (2019). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students' participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 831-851.
  11. Isohatala, J., Naykki, P., & Jarvela, S. (2019). Convergences of joint, positive interactions and regulation in collaborative learning. Small Group Research, Online first.
  12. Isohatala, J., Naykki, P., Baker, M. J., & Jarvela, S. (2018). Striking a balance: Socioemotional processes and argumentation in collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003
  13. Jarvenoja, H., & Jarvela, S. (2013). Regulating emotions together for motivated collaboration. In M. J. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Affective Learning Together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, (pp. 162-181). Routledge.
  14. Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohatala, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005
  15. Jarvenoja, H., & and Jarvela, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811
  16. Kim, M. K., & Ketenci, T. (2019). Learner participation profiles in an asynchronous online collaboration context. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.02.002
  17. Koh, J. H. L., Herring, S. C., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Project-based learning and student knowledge construction during asynchronous online discussion. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.003
  18. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
  19. Kwon, K., Liu, Y.-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004
  20. Lajoie, S. P., Lee, L., Poitras, E., Bassiri, M., Kazemitabar, M., Cruz-Panesso, I., Hmelo-Silver, C., Wiseman, J., Chan, L. K., & Lu, J. (2015). The role of regulation in medical student learning in small groups: Regulating oneself and others' learning and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 601-616.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.073
  21. Mabrito, M. (2006). A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_4
  22. Naykki, P., Isohatala, J., Jarvela, S., Poysa-Tarhonen, J., & Hakkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with theory-based script. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9259-5
  23. Naykki, P., Jarvela, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Jarvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning - A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001
  24. Norman, D. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.
  25. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press.
  26. Polo, C. (2019), Quand l'acces au debat est deja un combat. Repartition genree du style rhetorique bas dans les debats a visee educative, Genre Education Formation (3), 113-131.
  27. Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. P. (2016), Group Emotions: The Social and Cognitive Functions of Emotions in Argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123-156. https://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-01381014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8
  28. Polo, C., Plantin, C., Lund, K., & Niccolai, G. P. (2017), Group Emotions in Collective Reasoning: a Model. Argumentation, 31(2), 301-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9407-5
  29. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge University Press.
  30. Reed, E. S. (1988). The affordances of the animate environment : Social science from the ecological point of view. What is an animal, 110-126.
  31. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
  32. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp.69-197). Springer-Verlag.
  33. Simonian, S. (2020). Approche ecologique des environnements instrumentes : Comprendre le phenomene d'affordance socioculturelle. Savoirs, 1, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.052.0093
  34. Simonian, S., Quintin, J.-J., & Urbanski, S. (2016). La construction des collectifs dans l'apprentissage collaboratif a distance : L'affordance socioculturelle des objets numeriques. Les Sciences de l'education-Pour l'Ere nouvelle, 49(1), 63-90.
  35. Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological psychology, 15(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_2
  36. Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1103-1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.007
  37. Turvey, M. (1992). Affordances and prospective control : An outline of the ontology. Ecological psychology, 4(3), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
  38. Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions?. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503-2532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634
  39. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Graesser & A. Dunlosky (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  40. Wolters, C.A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
  41. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.