Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Checklist of Major Responsive Review Elements of Small-size Collective Housing Based on a Local Architectural Committee's Review Results - Focused on the Internal Indicators of Small-size Collective Housing in an Architectural Review -

지방건축위원회 심의결과에 따른 소형집합주택 주요 대응 검토항목 체크리스트화에 대한 연구 - 건축심의위원회의 소형집합주택 내부 항목 중심으로 -

  • 최경옥 (예가건축사사무소) ;
  • 김원필 (서울과학기술대학교 건축과)
  • Received : 2022.02.13
  • Accepted : 2022.04.11
  • Published : 2022.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to propose a checklist for architectural reviews based on the internal elements of small-size collective housing from an architectural committee's results of 25 district offices. From January 2019 through March 2020, approval documents of 25 Seoul district offices that were made public on the architectural committee's website were analyzed. Based on the review classification system in Seoul, a high frequency score of review comments produced an internal elements checklist. Frequency analysis with more than five comments among 2,907 cases revealed that internal elements were sorted into seven large-scale classifications of 39 elements and middle-scale classifications of 110 elements. During the first round, seven class types were arranged as public space, exclusive space, service space, section, insulation, waterproofing, and equipment. These elements counted as frequency for further content analysis. Middle-scale elements were rearranged according to the public classification system while prior elements were extracted from review comments and the frequency score. These research findings could act as a fundamental base in practically contributing to the use and establishment of a related research system.

Keywords

References

  1. Auri. (2018). A Study on Quality Control in Construction of Small-scale Housing, Presidential Commission on Architecture policy, 5.
  2. Choi, K.O., & Lee, Y.H. (2021). The characteristic analysis of the review opinions of small housings in Seoul in South Korea by external parts: Focused on passive and active opinions from the perspective of architects of the local government's architectural review, Journal of Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, 20(1), 100.
  3. Choi, K. O. (2021). A Study on Deriving the Characteristics of External Main Elements and Application Method through the Analysis of Review by the Architectural Committee: Focused on the Case of Seoul City, Ph. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 5.7-10.
  4. Jang, L. H. (2017). A Study on the Characteristics of Change of Architectural Design Review System in the Daegu Architectural Design Commission, Thesis, Kyungpook National University, 60.
  5. Kim, J. H. (2008). The Evaluation Inclination of Architectural Design Review in Gyeongsangnamdo, Thesis, Pusan National University, 31.
  6. Kim, J. H. (2016). A Study on an Effectiveness of the Public Design Committee Deliberation & Consultation: Focused on the Seongnam City Design Committee, Thesis, University of Seoul, 34.
  7. Kim, K. B. (2010). A study on the effectiveness of the apartment housing design review guideline, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(11), 78.
  8. Lee, S. H. (2014). A Study on the Architectural review of Borough on Multi-family Housing and Urban-life Housing: with the case of Gangbuk-gu, Thesis, University of Seoul, 26.
  9. Son, J. S. (2009). Analysis of Tendency with regard to Architecture Committee's Deliberation: Focusing on cases of deliberation in North Gyeongsang Province, Thesis, Kyungpook National University, 25.