Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure

Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering (응용생태공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Community Stability and Characteristics of Macroinvertebrates in Paddy Fields by Cultivation Method

논 재배방식에 따른 저서성대형무척추동물 군집특성 및 군집안정성 분석

  • Shin, I-Chan (Ecological Survey Division, Korean National Park Research Institute, KNPS) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Hyun (Planning & Coordination Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Eo, Jinu (Climate change Assessment Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science)
  • 신이찬 (국립공원연구원 생태조사부) ;
  • 김명현 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 기획조정과) ;
  • 어진우 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 기후변화평가과)
  • Received : 2021.11.01
  • Accepted : 2022.01.27
  • Published : 2022.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate in relation to characteristic of macroinvertebrates in conventional and organic paddy fields. The investigation was conducted five times a year for Suwon, Ansung, Boeun, Gunsan, Gimje, Hamyang, divide into conventional paddy fields and organic paddy fields from 2009 to 2011. The macroinvertebrates collected from the surveyed between conventional and organic paddy fields belonged to 84 species, 47 families, 16 orders, and 6 classes in 3 phyla. In the habitat orientied groups, climbers, swimmers and sprawlers were considerably occupied in conventional and organic paddy fields. In relation to the functional feeding groups, predators such as Odonata, Coleoptera, and Hemiptera were only the highest in paddy field ecosystem, regardless of cultivation method. As a result of community stability analysis, orgainc paddy fields has been identified much as species high resistance and resilience to environmental change in paddy field ecosystem. Species belonging to the I groups is considered to be important in organic paddy field such as Sternolophus rufipes, Hydrochara affinis, Helochares nipponicus, which has high mobility. In conclusion, it was found that the introduction of coleoptera as a food source was higher than that of conventional paddy fields in organic paddy field where primary consumers were abundant such as Chironomidae spp. and Dixidae sp..

본 연구는 관행과 유기논에 서식하는 저서성대형무척추동물의 군집특성 및 군집안정성을 알아보고자 수행되었다. 조사는 2009년부터 2011년까지 수원, 안성, 보은, 군산, 김제, 함양 등 6개 지역의 유기논과 관행논을 대상으로 1년에 5회에 걸쳐 실시하였다. 전 지점에서 출현한 저서성대형무척추동추동물은 총 3문 6강 16목 47과 84종이었다. 서식기능군은 기어오르는무리 (Climbers), 헤엄치는무리 (Swimmers), 기는무리 (Sprawlers)가 대부분을 차지하였으며, 섭식기능군은 잡아먹는무리 (Predators)인 잠자리목 (Odonata), 딱정벌레목 (Coleoptera), 노린재목 (Hemiptera)이 대부분을 차지하는 것으로 나타났으나, 관행과 유기논에서 군집구조의 확연한 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 관행논과 유기논에서의 군집안정성 분석에서는 관행논에 비해 유기논에서 I 그룹에 속하는 종인 애물땡땡이 (Sternolophus rufipes), 잔물땡땡이 (Hydrochara affinis), 좀물땡땡이 (Helochares nipponicus) 등 이동성이 강한 종과 자연생태계에서 서식하는 고추잠자리 (Crocothemis servilia)가 비교적 중요한 종인 것으로 나타났다. 결론적으로 1차 소비자인 깔따구류 (Chironomidae spp.), 모기류 (Dixidae sp.) 등이 풍부한 유기논에서는 이를 먹이원으로 하는 딱정벌레류의 도입이 관행논보다 더 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국립농업과학원 농업과학기술 연구개발사업 (과제번호: PJ01507302)의 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. An, C.H., Han, J.S., Hyun, J.B., Choi, J.K., and Lee, H.G. 2021. Comparison of the effects of continuous erosion control dams on benthic macroinvertebrate communities before and after the rainy season. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 8: 54-63. https://doi.org/10.17820/ERI.2021.8.1.054
  2. Baek, H.M., Kim, D.G., Baek, M.J., Lee, C.Y., Kang, H.J., Kim, M.C., Yoo, J.S., and Bae, Y.J. 2014. Predation efficiency and preference of the Hydrophilid Water Beetle Hydrochara affinis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) larvae on two mosquitos Culex pipiens molestus and Ochlerotatus togoi under laboratory conditions. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 32: 112-117. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2014.32.2.112
  3. Bengtsson, J., Ahnstrom, J., and Weibull, A.C. 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x
  4. Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A., and Wilson, J.D. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
  5. Butler, S.J., Brooks, D., Feber, R.E., Storkey, J., Vickery, J.A., and Norris, K. 2009. A cross-taxonomic index for quantifying the health of farmland biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1154-1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01709.x
  6. Elphick, C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conservation Bio logy 14: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98314.x
  7. Elphick, C.S. and Oring, L.W. 1998. Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00274.x
  8. Elphick, C.S. and Oring, L.W. 2003. Conservation implications of flooding rice fields on winter waterbird communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 94: 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00022-1
  9. Fasola, M. and Ruiz, M. 1996. The value of rice fields as substitutes for natural wetlands for waterbirds in the Mediterrnean region. Colonial Waterbirds 19: 122-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521955
  10. Gabriel, D., Sait, S.M., Hodgson, J.A., Schmutz, U., Kunin, W.E., and Benton, T.G. 2010. Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecology Letters 13: 858-869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01481.x
  11. Grant, I.F., Tirol, A.C., Aziz, T., and Watanabe, I. 1983. Regulation of Invertebrate Grazers as a Means to Enhance Biomass and Nitrogen Fixation of Cyanophyceae in Wetland Rice Fields. Soil Science Society of Americal Journal 47: 669-675. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700040013x
  12. Gregorio, M.T., David, A., Javier, B., and Jordi, F. 2011. Using landsat images to map habitat availability for waterbirds in rice fields. Ibis 153: 684-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01147.x
  13. Han, M.S., Na, H.K., Kang, K.K., Kim, M.R., Na, Y.E., Kim, H.R., and Kim, M.H. 2013. Characteristics of benthic invertebrates in Organic and Conventional Paddy field. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture 32: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.1.17
  14. Han, M.S., Na, Y.E., Bang, H.S., Kim, M.H., Kang, K.K., Hong, H.K., Lee, J.T., and Ko, B.G. 2008. Aquatic invertebrates in paddy ecosystem of Korea. National Academy of Agricultural Science, Swon. p. 1-529. (in Korean)
  15. Hynes, H.B.N. 1963. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool Univ. Press, Liverpool.
  16. Jakob, C. and Poulin, B. 2016. Indirect effects of mosquito control using bti on dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in the Camargue. Insect Conservation and Diversity 9: 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12155
  17. Jeong, E.M. 2006. "The development and characteristics of the environment-friendly agricultural policy in Korea" Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture 14(2): 117-137.
  18. Jeong, S.B., Oh, H.S., Jeon, H.S., Yang, K.S., and Kim, W.T. 2010. Aquatic insects fauna and characteristics of distribution on Jeju island wetlands. Journal of wetlands research 2: 35-46.
  19. Jun, Y.C., Kim, N.Y., Kwon, S.J., Han, S.C., Hwang, I.C., Park, J.H., Won, D.H., Byun, M.S., Kong, H.Y., Lee, J.E., and Hwang, S.J. 2011. Effects of land use on benthic macroinvertebrate communities: Comparison of two mountain streams in Korea. Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology 47: S35-S49. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011018
  20. Kadoya, T., Suda, S., and Washitani, I. 2009. Dragonfly crisis in Japan: a likely consequence of recent agricultural habitat degradation. Biological Conservation 142: 1899-1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.033
  21. Katayama, N., Goto, T., Narushima, F., Amano, T., Kobori, H., and Miyashita, T. 2013. Indirect positive effects of argricultural modernization on the abundance of Japanese tree tadpoles in rice fields through the release from predators. Aquatic. Ecology 47: 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-013-9437-0
  22. Kehde, P.M. and Wilhm, J.L. 1972. The effects of grazing by snails on community structure of periphyton in laboratory streams. The American Midland Naturalist 16: 8-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2423878
  23. Kim, J.O, Lee, S.H., and Jang, K.S. 2011. Efforts to Improve Biodiversity in Paddy Field Ecosystem of South Korea. Reintroduction 1: 25-30.
  24. Kim, J.S., Kwak, J.I., Noh, T.W., and Yi, P.I. 2013. Characteristics of Odonata communities based on Habitat types of superb biotope in Wonju city, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment Ecology 27: 209-218.
  25. Ma, S.-m. and Joachim, S. 2006. Review of History and Recent Development of Organic Farming Worldwide. Agricultural Sciences in China 5: 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60035-7
  26. Ma, Z., Li, B., Zhao, B., King, K., Tang, S., and Chen, J. 2004. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds?-a case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity Conservation 13: 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006502.96131.59
  27. Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W., and Berg, M.B. 2008. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 4th ed. Kendall/Hunt Publish. Co. Dubuque, lowa, pp. 1214
  28. Mesleard, F., Garnero, S., Beck, N., and Rosecchi, E. 2005. Uselessness and indirect negative effects of an insecticide on rice field invertebrates. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328: 955-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.003
  29. Paoletti, M.G. 1995. Biodiversity, traditional landscapes and agroecosystem management, Landsc. Urban Planning 31: 117-128.
  30. Ro, T.H. 2002. Categorization and Ecological Importance of Functional Feeding Groups as Essential Units in Lotic Ecosystems. Bulletin of the KACN 21: 67-93.
  31. Ro, T.H. and Chun, D.J. 2004. Functional Feeding Group Categorization of Korea Immature Aquatic Insects and Community Stability Analysis. Korean Journal of Limnology 37(2): 137-148.
  32. Selfa, T., Jussaume, R.A., and Winter, M. 2008. Envisioning agricultural sustainability from field to plate: Comparing producer and consumer attitudes and practices toward 'environmentally friendly' food and farming in Washington State, USA. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 262-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.09.001
  33. Shin, H.S. and Kim, B.C. 2014. The Lake survey method. Eco-Star Project, pp. 125.
  34. Simpson, I., Roger, P., Oficial, R., and Grant, I. 1994. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and pesticide management on floodwater ecology in a wetland ricefield. Biology and Fertility of Soils 17: 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337745
  35. Taft, O.W. and Haig, S.M. 2005. The value of agriculturalwetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 110: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.04.012
  36. Tourenq, C., Bennets, R.E., Kowalski, H., Vialet, E., Licchesi, J.L., Kayser, Y., and Isenmann, P. 2001. Are ricefileds a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camarguq, Southern France? Biological Conservation 100: 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00037-4
  37. Wilson, A.L., Ryder, D.S., Watts, R.J., and Stevens, M.M. 2005. Stable isotope analysis of aquatic invertebrate communities in irrigated rice fields cultivated under different management regimes. Aquatic Ecology 39: 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-7085-0
  38. Winqvist, C., Bengtsson, J., Aavik, T., Berendse, F., Clement, L.W., Eggers, S., Fischer, C., Flohre, A., Geiger, F., Liira, J., Part, T., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T., Weisser, W.W., and Bommarco, R. 2011. Mixed effects of organic farming and landscape complexity on farmland biodiversity and biological control potential across Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 570-579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01950.x
  39. Yoon, I.B. 1995. Aquatic insects of Korea, Junghaengsa, Seoul, Korea