Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Feedback-Based Instructional Materials for Process-Focused Assessment Classes in High School Mathematics Classes

고등학교 수학 수업에서 과정 중심 평가 수업을 위한 피드백 중심 수업 자료 개발에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2021.11.10
  • Accepted : 2021.12.14
  • Published : 2022.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a study that developed class materials that can apply Process-Focused Assessment to classes by paying attention to feedback using teacher learning community programs centered on teachers belonging to the same school in the field. In particular, this study was conducted with the aim of developing class materials applicable to actual classes. At this time, We thought about how to provide appropriate feedback when applying course-based evaluation in school field classes. It was conducted according to the procedure of data development research by Lee & Ahn(2021). As for the procedure of data development itself, an evaluation plan was established by establishing a strategy to reconstruct achievement standards and confirm understanding based on curriculum analysis. Next, an evaluation task, a scoring standard table, and a preliminary feedback preparation table were developed. In addition, based on these development materials, a learning guidance plan that can predict scenes when applying actual classes was developed as a result. This study has value as a practical study that can contribute to providing a link between theory and field schools. It is also meaningful in that it considered how the teacher would grasp when to provide feedback in performing rocess-Focused Assessment. Likewise, in providing feedback by teachers, it is meaningful in that it reflects in the data development how to prepare in advance and take classes according to the characteristics of the subject. Finally, it seems that the possibility of field application can be improved in that the results of the 4th class developed in this study are presented in a form applicable to the class directly in the field.

본 연구는 현장의 동일교 소속 교사들을 중심으로 교원학습공동체 프로그램을 이용하여 피드백에 주목하여 과정 중심 평가를 수업에 적용할 수 있는 수업 자료를 개발한 연구이다. 특히 실제 수업에 적용 가능한 수업 자료를 개발하는 것을 목적에 두고 진행한 연구이다. 이때 학교 현장 수업에서 과정 중심 평가를 적용할 때 어떻게 적절한 피드백을 제공할 것인지 고민하였다. 이동근, 안상진(2021)의 자료 개발 연구의 절차를 따라 진행하였으며, 자료 개발 자체의 절차는 교육과정 분석에 근거한 성취기준의 재구성과 이해도 확인 전략을 수립하여 평가계획을 수립하였다. 다음으로 평가과제와 채점 기준표 및 사전 피드백 준비표를 개발하였다. 또한 이들 개발 자료들에 근거하여 실제 수업 적용 시의 장면을 예상할 수 있는 학습 지도안을 결과물로 함께 개발하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ko, H. (2019). The Study on the Perception, Actual Condition, and Support Strategies of Process-Centered Assessment by Each Teacher. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 19(9), 1137-1164. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.9.1137
  2. Kim, N. O., Park, M. A., Lee, B. N., & Sohn, W. S. (2018). The role of Teacher Characteristics and Feedback in Developing Elementary students' Affective and Cognitive Achievement. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation. 21(2), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.2.129
  3. Kim, M. S. & Ryu, S. A. (2020). Teacher Feedback on Process-Centered Assessment for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education. 40(3), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.3.271
  4. Kim, S., Park, J., Son, W. S., & Jeong, H. K. (2021). Process-Centered Assessment Practice Case. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
  5. Kim, Y. J., Jang, W. H., & Hong, H. G. (2019). The Analysis and Implication of Student Evaluation in 2015 Science Curriculum using Text Network Analysis (TNA) Method: Focused on the Connection with Process Centered Evaluation. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 22(3), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.22799/JCE.2019.22.3.009
  6. Kim, I. H. (2015). Influence of Perceived Teacher Feedback of Dance Class on Intrinsic Motivation and Class Satisfaction of Middle School Students. Official Journal of Korean Society of Dance Science, 32(1), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.21539/ksds.2015.32.1.219
  7. Kim, J. M. (2018). The Concept and Educational Implication of Process-focused Assessment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(20), 839-859.
  8. Kim, T. H. & Kim, S. W. (2020). Practice of Process-centered Performance Assessment through Total Instructional Alignment: High School English Learning as an example. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(2), 91-110.
  9. Moon, S. J. & Shin, H. G. (2020). Focused Assessment Using Student Self-Assessment on Mathematics Achievement and Affective Domain. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea. 24(3), 279-297.
  10. Park, M. A. & Sohn, W. S. (2020). Exploring the Learner-centered Feedback Process Model: The Moderating Effect of Feedback Seeking Behavior. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 33(2), 377-400.
  11. Park, J. H., Jin, K. A., Kim, S. J., & Lee, S. A. (2020). A Study on the development of indexes for operation of process-fortified assessment in schools. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 23(2), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2020.23.2.157
  12. Ban, J. C., Kim, S., Park, J., & Kim, H. K. (2018). Teachers' Perceptions on the Teacher by Teacher Process fortified Assessment Policy. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(3), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.22799/JCE.2018.21.3.005
  13. Baek, S. K. (2002). Performance Assessment. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  14. Sohn, W. S., Shin, I. N., & Bae, J. H. (2014). Effects of Teachers' Classroom Assessment Practices on Student Math Confidence, Enjoyment and Achievement. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 27(5), 1337-1359.
  15. Shin, D. R., Wang, K S., & Kim, K. H. (2007). The Effects of Teaching/learning Methods of Mathematics Utilizing to Writing and Corrective feedback on Academic Achievement and Sense of self-efficacy. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 19(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2007.19.1.1
  16. Shin, B. M. & Lee, K. E. (2018). A Study on the Examination Case of a Process-Focused Assessment Instrument in a Teachers' Learning Community. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 21(4), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.4.73
  17. Yang, S. Y. (2020). Understanding and Utilization of Course-centered Assessments According to 2015 Revised Music Curriculums. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 727-747. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.17.727
  18. Yang, H. S., Shim, K. C., & Kim, H. S. (2016). Development of an Instructional Model for Science Experiment based on Feedback Process. School Science Journal, 10(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.10.2.201606.207
  19. Yang, H. S. & Kim, H. S. (2017). The Application Effect of Experimental Instruction Model based on Feedback Process in Middle School Science Class. School Science Journal, 11(2), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.11.2.201706.246
  20. Yu, S. B. & Kim, N. O. (2020). The Structural Relationship of Learner-centered Instruction, Feedback Experience, Affective Achievement, and Mathematical Competencies by Middle Schoolers. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 33(4), 791-814.
  21. Lee, K. H., Kang, H. Y., Koh, E. S., Lee, D. H., Shin, B. M., Lee, H. C., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Exploration of the Direction for the Practice of Process-Focused Assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(4), 819-834.
  22. Lee, D. G. (2019). A study on the development of integrated class data using the mathematical linkage found in the study of Mendel (1865). The Mathematical Education, 58(3), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2019.58.3.383
  23. Lee, D. G. & Ahn, S. J. (2021). A Case Study on the Development of Real-Time Interactive Class Data among Non-face-to-Face Remote Class Types. Communications of mathematical education, 35(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2021.35.2.173
  24. Lee, J. S. (2009). Evaluation of modern education. Seoul: Education and science company
  25. Lee, B. N. & Sohn, W. S. (2018). Meta-Analysis of Feedback Effects. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 31(3), 501-529.
  26. Chang, J. Y., Park, I. W., & Kim, E. J. (2018). The Effects of Teaching Method and Homework Feedback on Students' Class Attitude, Classroom Atmosphere, Class Satisfaction, Self-Directed Learning, and Academic Achievement. Teacher Education Research, 57(2), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.15812/TER.57.2.201806.246
  27. Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Priciples, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  28. Koka, A. & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teachers' feedback and learning environment as predictors of instrinsic motivation in physical education. Pcychology of sport and Exercise, 4, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00012-2
  29. Lane, S. & Stone, C. A. (2006). Performance assessment. Brennan, R. L.(Ed.). Educational Measurement (pp. 387-431).
  30. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  31. McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers' classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x
  32. McTighe, J. & Ferrara, S. (1996). Performance-based assessment in the classroom: a planning framework. In Blum, R. E. & Arter, J. A.(Ed.). A handbook for student performance assessment in an era of restructuring (pp. 1-5; 1-9).
  33. Ramapsarad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
  34. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Sage Publications, Inc.
  35. Shepard, L. A. (2006). Classroom assessment. Brennan, R. L. (Ed.). Educational Measurement (pp. 623-646).