Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing the Intention of Knowledge Sharing of Records Management Specialists in Government-affiliated Public Institutions

정부산하공공기관 기록물관리전문요원의 지식공유의도 영향요인에 관한 연구

  • 김영은 (연세대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.09
  • Accepted : 2022.03.10
  • Published : 2022.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to empirically verify the factors(organization managerial factors, relational factors and personal factors) that affect the knowledge sharing intention of records management specialists. A total of 126 responses were used for the final analysis and the findings of this study are as follows: First, managers' interests and supports had a significant positive effect on tacit knowledge sharing intention, but evaluation and compensation system had a negative effect on tacit knowledge sharing intention. Second, job stress was found to have a significant positive effect on the intention of knowledge sharing(tacit, explicit). It is required to form an organizational culture where records management specialists can freely participate in knowledge sharing activities with the interest and support of managers. In addition, the process of continuously improving the causes of one of the causes of job stress, such as awareness improvement and deprivation, should be carried out through records management training for all employees. This study is meaningful in that it provides policy implications for promoting knowledge sharing as a solution to the managerial problems faced by records management specialists by utilizing the current staffing structure.

본 연구의 목적은 기록물관리 전문요원의 조직관리적 요인, 관계적 요인, 개인적 요인이 지식공유의도와 어떠한 영향 관계를 갖는지 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위해 총 126건의 설문 데이터를 수집하여 분석하였고, 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 조직관리적 요인 중 관리자의 관심과 지원은 암묵지 공유의도에 정(+)적으로 유의한 영향을 미쳤으나, 평가보상제도는 암묵지 공유의도에 부(-)적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 개인적 요인 중 직무 스트레스는 암묵지 및 형식지 공유의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 분석 결과 관리자의 노력으로 지식공유 활동에 자유롭게 참여할 수 있는 조직 문화를 조성하는 것이 선행되어야 하며, 전 직원 대상의 기록관리 교육을 통해 직무 스트레스의 원인 중 하나인 인식 개선과 박탈감을 계속해서 개선해나갈 필요가 있다는 결론을 도출하였다. 한편 본 연구에서는 기록학 분야에서 아직 연구된 바 없는 기록물관리 전문요원의 지식공유를 주제로 하여 실증적으로 검증하였다. 이를 통해 기록물관리 전문요원이 처한 업무적 문제에 대한 해소 방안으로서 현재의 인력 배치 구조를 활용하여 지식공유를 활성화할 수 있는 정책적 함의를 제공한다는 점에서 연구 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5C2A03083499).

References

  1. Choi, J. H. (2017). A Study on the Influential Factors of Knowledge Sharing: Focused on the Postal Service Area. Master's thesis, Seoul University, Seoul.
  2. Kang, J. H. (2002). A Study on Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing Activities. Master's thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Business School.
  3. Kang, S. D. (2018). Interactive justice as a moderated mediator between open communication and knowledge-sharing intention. Korea Labor Institute, 18(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22914/jlp.2018.18.1.001
  4. Kim, G. (2003). A study on impacts of knowledge sharing intention in local government officials: used decision tree analysis. Journal of Local Government Studis, 15(3), 145-167.
  5. Kim, H. M. & Lee, Y. H. (2019). Current status and improvement plan for records management at research and management institutions: focused on core research records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.2.173
  6. Kim, J. J., Ryu, I., & Gong, H. G. (2003). An empirical study on the effect of knowledge sharing on knowledge management system performance. The Journal of Information Strategy, 6(2), 33-68.
  7. Kim, J. W., Lee, K. J., & Kim, Y. I. (2004). An empirical study of the differences in factors affecting knowledge sharing in terms of explicit knowledge and implicit knowledge. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 4(3), 133-160.
  8. Kim, S. S. (2016). A comparative study on the archival theory of Hilary Jenkinson and Theodore R. Schellenberg. Korean Society of Archival Studies, (50), 61-95. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2016.50.061
  9. Korea Education and Research Information Service. (2006). The operational definition and sub-area identification of digital literacy to activate knowledge and information capabilities in the 21st century. Daegu: KERIS.
  10. Korean Society Of Archival Studies. (2008). Glossary of archival study. Geonggi: Yukbi.
  11. Lee, H. J. & Kim, S. A. (2010). A study on the factors affecting knowledge contribution in the public sector. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.169
  12. Lee, H. Y. & Lee, S. Y. (2020). Performance-based system and work engagement: exploring the possibility of complementary coexistence of competition and cooperation. Korean Public Administration Review, 54(2), 183-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.54.2.183
  13. Lee, J. Y. & Cho, H. Y. (2013). Development of work stress measurement tool for academic librarians. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 47(3), 181-205.
  14. Lee, M. & Seol, H. D. (2020). A study on the relationship between job stress, knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior. Journal of Industrial Economics and Trade, 44(3), 89-116. https://doi.org/10.22915/rifi.2020.44.3.005
  15. Oh, S. T. & Park, S. C. (2014). Pros and cons on SNS usage for utilizing individuals' task. Journal of Cultural Industry Studies, 14(3), 37-48.
  16. Park, M. S. & Moon, H. K. (2004). An empirical study on factors influencing knowledge sharing among groups. Knowledge Management Review, 5(2), 1-23.
  17. Roh, J. R. (2005). A study on the relation between record and information management and knowledge management from the perspective of knowledge management: focused on the definition and management process. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 39(4), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.4.005
  18. Seol, H. D. (2006). An empirical study on the knowledge sharing in a financial institute. Knowledge Management Review, 7(2), 97-122.
  19. Shin, J. H. (2019). The Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Job Satisfaction on Job Performance. Master's thesis, Gachon University Graduate School, Korea.
  20. Shin, M. I. (2006). A Study of Factor Affecting in Knowledge Sharing between University Librarians. Master's thesis, Chonnam National University Graduate School, Korea.
  21. Shin, S. Y. & Lee, S. H. (2019). A study on development and validity verification of a measurement tool for digital literacy for university students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(7), 749-768. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.7.749
  22. Song, K. H. (2012). The Influence of The Quality of Guanxi on Knowledge-sharing Behavior. Master's thesis, KyungHee University Graduate School, Korea.
  23. Woo, T. G., Kim, M. J., & Kwon, K. H. (2019). The effects of knowledge sharing and work engagement on innovative behavior: focused on the moderating effect of perceived organizational support. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 26(4), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.14396/jhrmr.2019.26.4.105
  24. Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  25. Allee, V. (2005). The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing.
  26. Bartol, K. M. & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105
  27. Connelly, C. E. & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees' perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 24(5), 294-301. https://doi/10.1108/01437730310485815
  28. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  29. Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045670
  30. Goh, S. K., Jayaraman, K., Mostafiz, M. I., & Leow, Y. M. (2020). The effect of organisational climate on employees' creative performance through knowledge sharing behaviour. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.01.001
  31. Green, A. R. & Lee, E. (2020). From transaction to collaboration: redefining the academic-archivist relationship in business collections. Archives and Records, 41(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2019.1689109
  32. Hanif, M. I., Sagheer, H., & Mehak, S. (2020). Impact of knowledge sharing and knowledge retention on employees development through the mediation of sustainable competitive advantage and moderation of transformational leadership. International Review of Management and Marketing, 10(4), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.9931
  33. Hansen, M. T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
  34. Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429
  35. Ioncef, C. S. (2017). Considerazioni sulla gestione dei documenti e degli archivi nell'ambito dell'attivita delle istituzioni dell'unione europea. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Studia Europaea, 62(1), 71-87. http://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.1.04
  36. Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Heilmann, P. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 621-636. http://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0398
  37. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Social uncertainty and collective paranoia in knowledge communities: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. The management of Knowledge. UK: Taylor & Francis.
  38. Kumar, K. K., Jain, K. K., & Tiwary, R. R. (2013). Leadership activities and their impact on creating knowledge in organizations: theses. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 15-27.
  39. Lee, C. C. & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783-794. https://doi/10.1108/02621710010378228
  40. Malik, M. S. & Kanwal, M. (2018). Impacts of organizational knowledge sharing practices on employees' job satisfaction: mediating roles of learning commitment and interpersonal adaptability. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(1), 2-17. https://doi/10.1108/JWL-05-2016-0044
  41. Maravilhas, S. & Martins, J. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs. Journal of Business Research, 94(1), 353-359. https://doi-org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061
  42. McCain, W. D. (1951). Some suggestions for national archives cooperation with the state archives. The American Archivist, 14(3), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.14.3.vp70355011375236
  43. Nelson, K. M. & Cooprider, J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 409-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/249562
  44. Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., & Phusavat, K. (2018) Trust and its impact towards continuance of use in government-to-business online service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3), 265-285. https://doi-org/10.1108/TG-02-2018-0008
  45. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Day.
  46. Sang, L., Xia, D., Ni, G., Cui, Q., Wang, J., & Wang, W. (2020). Influence mechanism of job satisfaction and positive affect on knowledge sharing among project members: moderator role of organizational commitment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 245-269. https://doi-org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2018-0463
  47. Sauer, A. (2009). Why archivists should be leaders in scholarly communication. Journal of Archival Organization, 71(2), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332740902897444
  48. Victor Jr, P., Otto, J., & Mutschler, C. (2013). Assessment of library instruction on undergraduate student success in a documents-based research course: the benefits of librarian, archivist, and faculty collaboration. Collaborative Librarianship, 5(3), 154-176. https://doi.org/10.29087/2013.5.3.04
  49. Wakimoto, D. K. & Bruce, C. S. (2015). Experiencing archives at universities: archivists, librarians, understanding, and collaboration. Reference Services Review, 43(2), 182-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0025
  50. Yeo, G. (2018). Records, Information and Data: Exploring the Role of Record-keeping in an Information Culture. London, UK: Facet.