DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mobile sand barriers for windblown sand mitigation: Effects of plane layout and included angle

  • Gao, Li (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University) ;
  • Cheng, Jian-jun (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University) ;
  • Ding, Bo-song (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University) ;
  • Lei, Jia (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University) ;
  • An, Yuan-feng (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University) ;
  • Ma, Ben-teng (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University)
  • Received : 2021.05.14
  • Accepted : 2022.01.16
  • Published : 2022.03.25

Abstract

Mobile sand barriers are a new type sand-retaining structure that can be moved and arranged according to the engineering demands of sand control. When only used for sand trapping, mobile sand barriers could be arranged in single row. For the dual purposes of sand trapping and sand stabilization, four rows of mobile sand barriers can be arranged in a staggered form. To reveal the effect of plane layout, the included angle between sand barrier direction and wind direction on the characteristics of flow fields and the sand control laws of mobile sand barriers, numerical computations and wind tunnel tests were conducted. The results showed that inflows deflected after passing through staggered arrangement sand barriers due to changes in included angle, and the sand barrier combination exerted successive wind resistance and group blocking effects. An analysis of wind resistance efficiency revealed that the effective protection length of staggered arrangement sand barriers approximately ranged from the sand barrier to 10H on the leeward side (H is sand barrier height), and that the effective protection length of single row sand barriers roughly ranged from 1H on the windward side to 20H on the leeward side. The distribution of sand deposit indicated that the sand interception increased with increasing included angle in staggered arrangement. The wind-breaking and sand-trapping effects were optimal when included angle between sand barrier direction and wind direction is 60°-90°.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52168065). The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor who helped to improve the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Andrew, F. and Gary, K. (1996), "Toward a model for airflow on the lee side of aeolian dunes", Sedimentology, 43 (3),451-458. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3091.1996.d01-20.x.
  2. Bruno, L., Fransos, D. and Giudice, A.L. (2018b), "Solid barriers for windblown sand mitigation: Aerodynamic behavior and conceptual design guidelines", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 173, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.005.
  3. Bruno, L., Horvat, M. and Raffaele, L. (2018a), "Windblown sand along railway infrastructures: A review of challenges and mitigation measures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 177, 340-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.04.021.
  4. Chatterjee, D. and Biswas, G. (2015), "Dynamic behavior of flow around rows of square cylinders kept in staggered arrangement", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 136, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.019.
  5. Chen, B.Y., Cheng, J.J., Xin, L.G. and Wang, R. (2019), "Effectiveness of hole plate-type sand barriers in reducing aeolian sediment flux: Evaluation of effect of hole size", Aeolian Res., 38, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2019.03.001.
  6. Cheng, J.J. and Xue, C.X. (2014), "The sand-damage-prevention engineering system for the railway in the desert region of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 125, 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.11.016.
  7. Cheng, J.J., Ding, B.S., Gao, L., Zhi, L.Y. and Zheng, Z.P. (2021), "Numerical study on the bearing response trend of perforated sheet-type sand fences", Aeolian Res., 53,100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100734.
  8. Cheng, J.J., Jiang, F.Q., Xue, C.X., Xin, G.W., Li, K.C. and Yang, Y.H. (2015), "Characteristics of the disastrous wind-sand environment along railways in the Gobi area of Xinjiang, China", Atmosph Environ., 102, 334-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.018.
  9. Cheng, J.J., Lei, J.Q., Li, S.Y. and Wang, H.F. (2016a), "Disturbance of the inclined inserting-type sand fence to wind-sand flow fields and its sand control characteristics", Aeolian Res., 21, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.04.008.
  10. Cheng, J.J., Lei, J.Q., Li, S.Y. and Wang, H.F. (2016b), "Effect of hanging-type sand fence on characteristics of wind-sand flow fields", Wind Struct., 22(5), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.5.555.
  11. Cheng, J.J., Xin, G.W., Zhi, L.Y. and Jiang, F.Q. (2017b), "Unloading characteristics of sand-drift in wind-shallow areas along railway and the effect of sand removal by force of wind", Sci Rep., 7, 41462. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41462.
  12. Cheng, J.J., Zhi, L.Y. and Xue, C.X. (2017a), "Characteristics of wind-sand flow field of box-type movable sand barrier", J. Traffic Transport. Eng., 17 (05),61-70.
  13. Guillaume, D.W. and LaRue, J.C. (1999), "Investigation of the flopping regime with two-, three- and four-cylinder arrays", Exp Fluids., 27, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s003480050339.
  14. Harichandan, A.B. and Roy, A. (2010), "Numerical investigation of low Reynolds number flow past two and three circular cylinders using unstructured grid CFR scheme", Int J Heat Fluid Flow., 31, 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.01.007.
  15. He, W., Huang, N., Xu, B. and Wang, W.B. (2018), "Numerical simulation of wind-sand movement in the reversed flow region of a sand dune with a bridge built downstream", Eur. Phys. J. E. 41(4), 53. https://10.1140/epje/i2018-11660-5.
  16. Hotta, S., Kraus, N.C. and Horikawa, K. (1987), "Function of sand fences in controlling wind-blown sand", Coastal Sediments, 87, 772-787.
  17. Huang, N., Zheng, X. J. and Zhou, Y. H. (2006), "A multi-objective optimization method for probability density function of lift-off speed of wind-blown sand movement", Adv. Eng. Softw., 37(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.03.015.
  18. Jackson, D.W.T., Beyers, M., Delgado-Fernandez, I., Baas, A.C. W., Cooper, A.J. and Lynch, K. (2013), "Airflow reversal and alternating corkscrew vortices in foredune wake zones during perpendicular and oblique offshore winds", Geomorphology, 187(5), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.037.
  19. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T. and Lu, P.C. (1998), "Investigation of interference effects for a group of finite cylinders", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 77(8), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00168-8.
  20. Kataoka, H., Ono, Y. and Enoki, K. (2020), "Applications and prospects of CFD for wind engineering fields", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 205, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104310.
  21. Kays, W.M. (1994), "Turbulent prandtl number - where are we", J. Heat Transfer. 116, 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2911398
  22. Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B. (1974), "The numerical computation of turbulent flows", Comput. Method Appl. M. 3, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
  23. Lee, S.J., Park, K.C. and Park, C.W. (2002), "Wind tunnel observations about the shelter effect of porous fences on the sand particle movements", Atmos Environ., 36(9), 1453-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00578-7.
  24. Li, B.L. and Sherman, D.J. (2015), "Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences: A review", Aeolian Res., 17, 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.11.005.
  25. Qiu, X., Liu, H.Q. and He, M.J. (2017), "Experimental study for the cross-flow around three cylinders in an isosceles right triangle configuration", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 170, 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.013.
  26. Qu, J.J., Ling, Y.Q., Liu, X.W., Lei, J.Q., Li, F. and Yu, Z.Y. (2002), "The effects of an A-typed nylon fence on Aeolian sand prevention", J. Lanzhou Univ. Nat. Sci., 38(2), 171-176.
  27. Shi, L., Wang, D.Y., Cui, K. and Xue, C.X. (2021), "Comparative evaluation of concrete sand-control fences used for railway protection in strong wind areas", Rail. Eng. Science., 29(2), 183-198. https://doi:10.1007/s40534-020-00228-5.
  28. Tominaga, Y., Okaze, T. and Mochida, A. (2018), "Wind tunnel experiment and CFD analysis of sand erosion/deposition due to wind around an obstacle", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 182, 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.008.
  29. Wang, C., Li, S.Y., Li, Z.N., Lei, J.Q. and Chen, J. (2020), "Effects of windblown sand damage on desert highway guardrails", Nat Hazards., 103, 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03987-w.
  30. Wang, T., Qu, J.J., Ling, Y.Q., Liu, B.L. and Xiao, J.H. (2018), "Shelter effect efficacy of sand fences: A comparison of systems in a wind tunnel", Aeolian Res., 30, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2017.11.004.
  31. Wen, C.Y. and Yu, Y.H. (1966), "Mechanics of fluidization", Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Series. 62. 100-11.
  32. Xiao, J.H., Yao, Z.Y. and Qu, J.J. (2015), "Influence of Golmud-Lhasa section of Qinghai-Tibet Railway on blown sand transport", Chin. Geogra. Sci., 25(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0722-1.
  33. Xin, G.W., Huang, N., Zhang, J. and Dun, H.C. (2021), "Investigations into the design of sand control fence for Gobi buildings", Aeolian Res., 49, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.10066.
  34. Yao, Z., Li, X. and Xiao, J. (2018), "Characteristics of daily extreme wind gusts on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China", J. Arid Land, 10(5), 673-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0094-y.
  35. Zhang K.C., Qu, J.J., Liao, K.T., Niu, Q.H. and Han, Q.J. (2010), "Damage by wind-blown sand and its control along Qinghai-Tibet Railway in China", Aeolian Res., 1, 143-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2009.10.001.
  36. Zhou, J., Lei, J.J., Li, S.Y., Wang, H.F., Sun, N. and Ma, X.X. (2016), "A wind tunnel study of sand-cemented bodies on wind erosion intensity and sand transport", Nat Hazards., 82, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2177-4.