DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The reliability test of a smart insole for gait analysis in stroke patients

  • Seo, Tae-Won (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Severance Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Young (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Byoung-Hee (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.03
  • 심사 : 2021.10.28
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31

초록

Background: This study analyzed the reliability of smart guides for gait analysis in patients with stroke. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The participants of the study were 30 patients with stroke who could walk more than 10 m and had an MMSE-K test score of ≥24. Prior to the experiment, the subjects or their guardians entered their demographic characteristics including gender, age, height, weight into the prepared computer. The experiment was conducted in a quiet, comfortable, and independent location, and the patient was reminded of the equipment description, precautions, and safety rules for walking. A smart insole was inserted into the shoes of the patients and the shoes were put on before the patients walked three times on the 5-m gait analysis system mat installed in the laboratory. Results: The reliability of the equipment was compared with that of the gait analysis system, and the results of this study are as follows: among the gait analysis items, velocity had an ICC=0.982, the cadence had an ICC=0.905, the swing phase on the side of the gait cycle had an ICC=0.893, the swing phase on the side of the gait had an ICC=0.839, that on the non-affected side had an ICC=0.939, single support on the affected side had an ICC=0.812, and support on the non-affected side had an ICC=0.767. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate no statistical difference between the smart insole and the gait analysis system. Therefore, it is believed that real-time gait analysis through smart insole measurement could help patients in rehabilitation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdul Razak A, Zayegh A, Begg RK, et al. Foot plantar pressure measurement system: A review. Sensors 2012;12(7);9884-912. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120709884
  2. Antipova D, Eadie L, Macaden A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tools for assessment of acute stroke: a systematic review. BMC emergency medicine 2019;19(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0262-1
  3. Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke. Gait & Posture 2009;29(3):408-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.061
  4. Bamberg SJM, Benbasat AY, Scarborough DM, et al. Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine 2008;12(4):413-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2007.899493
  5. Benson LC, Clermont CA, Bosnjak E, et al. The use of wearable devices for walking and running gait analysis outside of the lab: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 2018;63:124-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.047
  6. Bilney B, Morris M, Webster K. Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait. Gait & Posture 2003;17(1):68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00053-X
  7. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1988;11(2):18184.
  8. Braun BJ, Veith NT, Hell R, et al. Validation and reliability testing of a new, fully integrated gait analysis insole. J Foot Ankle Res 2015;8:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0111-8
  9. Campbell GB, Matthews JT. An integrative review of factors associated with falls during post-stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010;42(4):395-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01369.x
  10. Chen S, Lach J, Lo B, et al. Toward pervasive gait analysis with wearable sensors: A systematic review. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 2016;20(6):1521-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2608720
  11. Cleland BT, Arshad H, Madhavan S. Concurrent validity of the GAITRite electronic walkway and the 10-m walk test for measurement of walking speed after stroke. Gait Posture 2019;68:458-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.035
  12. Delafontaine A, Vialleron T, Hussein T, et al. Anticipatory Postural Adjustments During Gait Initiation in Stroke Patients. Front Neurol 2019;10:352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00352
  13. Dickstein R, Nissan M, Pillar T, et al. Foot-ground pressure pattern of standing hemiplegic patients: major characteristics and patterns of improvement. Physical therapy 1984;64(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/64.1.19
  14. Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke2002;33(1):167-77. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0102.101014
  15. Dusing SC, Thorpe DE. A normative sample of temporal and spatial gait parameters in children using the GAITRite® electronic walkway. Gait & Posture 2007;25(1):135-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.06.003
  16. Kavanagh JJ, Menz HB. Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking. Gait & Posture 2008;28(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.010
  17. Kelley RE, Borazanci AP. Stroke rehabilitation. Neurological research 2009;31(8):832-40. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164109X12445505689689
  18. Kim JJ, Lee JW. Asystematic review of effects and methods of treadmill training applied to stroke patients. Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science 2020;27(2):63-79. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2020.09.27.2.63
  19. Kobsar D, Olson C, Paranjape R, et al. Evaluation of age-related differences in the stride-to-stride fluctuations, regularity and symmetry of gait using a waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer. Gait & Posture 2014;39(1):553-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.008
  20. Kressig RW, Beauchet O. Guidelines for clinical applications of spatio-temporal gait analysis in older adults. Aging clinical and experimental research 2006;18(2):174-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327437
  21. Kuys SS, Brauer SG, Ada L. Test-retest reliability of the GAITRite system in people with stroke undergoing rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33(19-20):1848-53. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.549895
  22. Latorre J, Colomer C, Alcaniz M, et al. Gait analysis with the Kinect v2: normative study with healthy individuals and comprehensive study of its sensitivity, validity, and reliability in individuals with stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019;16(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0568-y
  23. Lim JH, Park SJ. The effects of coordinative locomotor training on balance in patients with chronic stroke: meta-analysis of studies in Korea. Journal of Korean Physical Therapy science 2020;27(2):36-47. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2020.09.27.2.36
  24. Mannini A, Trojaniello D, Cereatti A, et al. A machine learning framework for gait classification using inertial sensors: Application to elderly, post-stroke and huntington's disease patients. Sensors 2016;16(1):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010134
  25. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, et al. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002;83(8):1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.33984
  26. McDonough AL, Batavia M, Chen FC, et al. The validity and reliability of the GAITRite system's measurements: A preliminary evaluation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2001;82(3):419-25. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.19778
  27. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. circulation 2017;135(10): e146-e603.
  28. Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2005;86(8):1552-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026
  29. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. Journal of aging and physical activity 2015;23(2):314-22. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2013-0236
  30. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Camicioli R, et al. Gait impairments in Parkinson's disease. The Lancet Neurology 2019;18(7):697-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30044-4
  31. Moon Y, Sung J, An R, et al. Gait variability in people with neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human movement science 2016;47:197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.010
  32. Park KB, Park H, Park BK, et al. Clinical and Gait Parameters Related to Pelvic Retraction in Patients with Spastic Hemiplegia. J Clin Med 2019;8(5).
  33. Patterson SL, Rodgers MM, Macko RF, et al. Effect of treadmill exercise training on spatial and temporal gait parameters in subjects with chronic stroke: a preliminary report. Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2008;45(2):221. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.02.0024
  34. Perry J, Davids JR. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 1992;12(6):815. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199211000-00023
  35. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, et al. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995;26(6):982-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.6.982
  36. Pistacchi M, Gioulis M, Sanson F, et al. Gait analysis and clinical correlations in early Parkinson's disease. Functional neurology 2017;32(1):28. https://doi.org/10.11138/FNeur/2017.32.1.028
  37. Ramakrishnan T, Kim SH, Reed KB. Human gait analysis metric for gait retraining. Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2019.
  38. Seo M, Shin MJ, Park TS, et al. Clinometric Gait Analysis Using Smart Insoles in Patients With Hemiplegia After Stroke: Pilot Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(9):e22208. https://doi.org/10.2196/22208
  39. Sprager S, Juric MB. Inertial sensor-based gait recognition: A review. Sensors 2015;15(9):22089-127. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150922089
  40. Tao W, Liu T, Zheng R, et al. Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors 2012;12(2):2255-83. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120202255
  41. Tornbom K, Sunnerhagen KS, Danielsson A. Perceptions of physical activity and walking in an early stage after stroke or acquired brain injury. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0173463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173463
  42. Van Uden CJ, Besser MP. Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite®). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2004;5(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-5-13
  43. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, et al. Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clinical rehabilitation 2006;20(5):451-8. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr955oa
  44. Wang CY, Lin YH, Chen TR, et al. Gait speed measure: the effect of different measuring distances and the inclusion and exclusion of acceleration and deceleration. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2012;114(2):469-78. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.25.26.PMS.114.2.469-478
  45. Wang X, Shen B, Sun D, et al. Aspirin ameliorates cerebral infarction through regulation of TLR4/NF κB mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress in mouse model. Molecular Medicine Reports 2018;17(1):479-87.
  46. Webster KE, Wittwer JE, Feller JA. Validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. Gait & Posture 2005;22(4):317-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.005
  47. Wentink E, Schut V, Prinsen E, et al. Detection of the onset of gait initiation using kinematic sensors and EMG in transfemoral amputees. Gait & Posture 2014;39(1):391-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.008
  48. Werner C, Chalvatzaki G, Papageorgiou XS, et al. Assessing the concurrent validity of a gait analysis system integrated into a smart walker in older adults with gait impairments. Clin Rehabil 2019;33(10):1682-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519852143
  49. Wonsetler EC, Bowden MG. A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 1: spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios. Top Stroke Rehabil 2017;24(6):435-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1285746