Effects of Korean value incentive program on the in-hospital mortality in acute hemorrhagic stroke patients

가감지급사업 실행 후 급성기 출혈성 뇌졸중의 원내 사망률 변화 분석

  • Seol, Jin-Ju (Department of Health Administration, Yonsei University Graduate School) ;
  • Yoo, Ki-Bong (Division of Health Administration, College of Software and Digital Health care Convergence, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Soo (Division of Health Administration, College of Software and Digital Health care Convergence, Yonsei University)
  • 설진주 (연세대학교 일반대학원 보건행정학과) ;
  • 유기봉 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 보건행정학부) ;
  • 이광수 (연세대학교 소프트웨어디지털헬스케어융합대학 보건행정학부)
  • Received : 2022.02.14
  • Accepted : 2022.03.14
  • Published : 2022.03.30

Abstract

Purposes: This study purposed to evaluate the effect of a value incentive program(VIP) on the in-hospital mortality of acute stroke. Methodology: Study period was from January 2010 to December 2018. This study included 63 hospitals for acute hemorrhagic stroke that the mortality rate per month was more than one during study period. Independent variables were time variables and hospital characteristics such as hospital type, district and bed number. Interrupted time series analysis was applied to analyze the data. Findings: In case of general hospitals, the in-hospital mortality rate per month for acute hemorrhagic stroke tends to be increased by 0.03% in overall study periods but decreased by 0.32% after the implementation of the policy. On the other hand, tertiary hospital changes are not statistically meaningful. Conclusion: This study provides evidences how the VIP was effective in improving quality of acute hemorrhagic stroke care. General hospitals showed higher policy effect compare to that of tertiary hospitals.

Keywords

References

  1. 2014년도 급성기뇌졸중 평가결과:건강보험심사평가원: 2014.
  2. Yang, J. H., Kim, S. M., Han, S. J., Knaak, M., Yang, G. H., Lee, K. D, et al. The impact of Value Incentive Program (VIP) on the quality of hospital care for acute stroke in Korea. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2016;28(5):580-585. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw081
  3. Van Herck, P., De Smedt, D., Annemans, L., Remmen, R., Rosenthal, M. B., Sermeus, W. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC health services research 2010;10(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-1
  4. Grossbart, S. R. What's the return? Assessing the effect of "pay-for-performance" initiatives on the quality of care delivery. Medical Care Research and Review 2006;63(1_suppl):29S-48S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558705283643
  5. Young, G. J., Meterko, M., Beckman, H., Baker, E., White, B., Sautter, K. M., Burgess, J. F, et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007;22(6):872-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0185-5
  6. Campbell, S. M., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Sibbald, B., Roland, M. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;361(4):368-378. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0807651
  7. Eijkenaar, F., Emmert, M., Scheppach, M., Schoffski, O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health policy 2013;110(2-3):115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.008
  8. Cho, K. H., Nam, C. M., Lee, S. G., Kim, T. H., Lee, S. H., Park, E. C. Measuring of quality of care in patients with stroke and acute myocardial infarction: an application of algebra effectiveness model. Medicine 2019;98(20).
  9. 이광수, 이상일, 서경, 도영미. 건강보험 청구명세서 자료를 이용한 제왕절개 분만율 위험도 보정의 효과. 예방의학회지 2005;38(2):132-140
  10. Wagner, A. K., Soumerai, S. B., Zhang, F., Ross-Degnan, D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics 2002;27(4):299-309. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x
  11. Saposnik, G., Baibergenova, A., O'donnell, M., Hill, M. D., Kapral, M. K., Hachinski, V. Hospital volume and stroke outcome: does it matter?. Neurology 2007;69(11):1142-1151. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000268485.93349.58
  12. Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., Trend Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. American journal of public health 2004;94(3):361-366. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.361
  13. Lindenauer, P. K., Remus, D., Roman, S., Rothberg, M. B., Benjamin, E. M., Ma, A., Bratzler, D. W. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356(5):486-496. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa064964
  14. 이상일, 김남순, 이진용, 조민우, 김선하, 손우승, et al. 요양급여 적정성 평가 가감지급 모형개발 연구: 건강보험심사평가원:2010.
  15. 윤효정, 박은철. 외국의 성과연동지불제도 현황과 가감지급사업의 발전방향. 보건행정학회지 2017;27(2):121-127. https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2017.27.2.121
  16. 강희정, 박은자, 오미애, 지영건, 하솔잎, 신나라. 가감지급사업 개선방안 연구:건강보험심사평가원:2019
  17. Bae, S. O., Kang, G. W. A comparative study of the disease codes between Korean National Health Insurance Claims and Korean National Hospital Discharge in-depth injury survey. Health Policy and Management 2014;24(4):322-329. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2014.24.4.322