DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do school-based nutrition interventions improve the eating behavior of school-age children?

  • Buyco, Nesrianne G. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute) ;
  • Dorado, Julieta B. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute) ;
  • Azana, Glenda P. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute) ;
  • Viajar, Rowena V. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute) ;
  • Aguila, Divorah V. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute) ;
  • Capanzana, Mario V. (Department of Science and Technology, Food and Nutrition Research Institute)
  • Received : 2020.08.14
  • Accepted : 2021.08.17
  • Published : 2022.04.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Filipino children aged 6-10 yrs are consuming poor quantities and quality of food based on the 2013 Philippine National Nutrition Survey. During these years healthy eating habits must be formed through family influence. Within this background, a complete package of nutrition intervention-feeding and nutrition classes, was pilot tested in selected schools to determine 1) changes in nutrition attitude and behavior and 2) food intake of schoolchildren after the intervention. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used in the study. School children aged 7-9 yrs enrolled in selected Philippine public elementary schools and their mothers/caregivers were the study participants. Profile and socio-demographic data were collected from each participant at baseline. The nutrition behavior and food intake of children were determined using the modified Child and Diet Evaluation Tool (CADET) and the 24-h food recall form, respectively. Data were analyzed using Stata version 15. RESULTS: No significant differences in characteristics were found among the 339 child-mother pairs in the 4 study groups. The modified CADET recorded improved mean attitude scores of children ranging from 22 to 24 points at endline in the group receiving both lunch feeding and nutrition education classes (group 3). The perceived better behavior of children was reported by their mothers in terms of increased intake of milk and vegetables and decreased consumption of sugar. These improvements were supported by the actual food intake of children obtained from the 24-h food recall. CONCLUSIONS: Family involvement, particularly of mothers/caregivers, appeared to be an important factor in shaping the children's eating behavior. An intervention package with lunch feeding and nutrition classes resulted in a substantial improvement in children's behavior and actual food intake with increased levels of vegetables and milk while lowering sugar consumption. The adoption of the intervention package in public elementary schools should therefore be pursued.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Josilyn S. Solana, Schools Division Superintendent of the Department of Education- Laguna, Philippines for granting permission and approval to conduct the study; Florentina C. Rancap and Prima Cecilia Ilagan, Public Schools District Supervisors, for providing support throughout the project duration. We express our deep appreciation to Dr. Orlando T. Valverde, Chief, Curriculum Implementation Division of DepEd-Laguna for reviewing the KAB questionnaire for children. We also express gratitude to the principals of 9 selected schools, namely Christopher F. Putungan; Brenda A. Urrera; Regina N. Ramirez; Jose M. Evangelista; Maribeth H. Sotomayor; Maiel A. Luzande; Celia A. Matalog; Nemeflor M. Gumobao; Loredel C. Gecalao; as well as the teachers and staff for supporting and providing assistance during the implementation of the study. We acknowledge the hired Project Assistants involved in the data collection and monitoring of the project, and Joanne Jette S. Gulay for assisting in the pre-testing of questionnaires and field data collection, and Rafael T. Dela Cruz for providing expertise in statistical analyses from the Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute (DOST-FNRI).

References

  1. Christian MS, Evans CEL, Hancock N, Nykjaer C, Cade JE. Family meals can help children reach their 5 a day: a cross-sectional survey of children's dietary intake from London primary schools. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013;67:332-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201604
  2. Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute (DOST-FNRI). Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2013: Food Consumption Survey. Taguig: Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute (DOST-FNRI); 2015.
  3. Angeles-Agdeppa I, Denney L, Toledo MB, Obligar VA, Jacquier EF, Carriquiry AL, Capanzana MV. Inadequate nutrient intakes in Filipino schoolchildren and adolescents are common among those from rural areas and poor families. Food Nutr Res 2019;63:3435.
  4. Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute (DOST-FNRI). Philippine Nutrition Facts and Figures 2015: Updating of Nutritional Status of Filipino Children and Other Population Groups Anthropometric Survey. Taguig: Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute (DOST-FNRI); 2016.
  5. Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp BInternational Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007;369:60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60032-4
  6. Moxley RL, Jicha KA, Thompson GH. Testing the importance of family solidarity, community structure, information access, and social capital in predicting nutrition health knowledge and food choices in the Philippines. Ecol Food Nutr 2011;50:215-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2011.568907
  7. Scaglioni S, Arrizza C, Vecchi F, Tedeschi S. Determinants of children's eating behavior. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:2006S-2011S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.001685
  8. Fisk CM, Crozier SR, Inskip HM, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, Robinson SMSouthampton Women's Survey Study Group. Influences on the quality of young children's diets: the importance of maternal food choices. Br J Nutr 2011;105:287-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510003302
  9. World Health Organization. Healthy diet [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2020 April 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/behealthy/healthy-diet.
  10. Department of Education. DO 13, S. 2017 Policy and guideline on healthy food and beverage choices in schools and in Deped offices [Internet]. Pasig: Department of Education; 2017 [cited 2020 March 2]. Available from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DO_s2017_013.pdf.
  11. Department of Education. DO 39, S. 2017 Operational guidelines on the implementation of school-based feeding program for school years 2017-2022 [Internet]. Pasig: Department of Education; 2017 [cited 2020 March 2]. Available from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/08/07/do-39-s-2017-operational-guidelines-onthe-implementation-of-school-based-feeding-program-for-school-years-2017-2022/.
  12. Albert JRG, Tabunda AML, Angeles-Agdeppa I. Policy note 2015-01 feeding severely wasted children in school: examining processes in DepEd's school feeding program [Internet]. Philippine Institute for Development Studies; 2015 [cited 2020 March 31]. Available from: https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/ webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidspn1501.pdf.
  13. Department of Education. DM 293, S. 2007 Gulayan sa Paaralan [Internet]. Pasig: Department of Education; 2007 [cited 2020 March 31]. Available from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/ uploads/2018/10/DM_s2007_293.pdf.
  14. Scaglioni S, Salvioni M, Galimberti C. Influence of parental attitudes in the development of children eating behaviour. Br J Nutr 2008;99 Suppl 1:S22-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508892471
  15. Cooke L. The importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review. J Hum Nutr Diet 2007;20:294-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00804.x
  16. Lakkakula A, Geaghan J, Zanovec M, Pierce S, Tuuri G. Repeated taste exposure increases liking for vegetables by low-income elementary school children. Appetite 2010;55:226-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.003
  17. Asakura K, Todoriki H, Sasaki S. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake among primary school children in Japan: combined effect of children's and their guardians' knowledge. J Epidemiol 2017;27:483-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.je.2016.09.014
  18. Cade JE, Frear L, Greenwood DC. Assessment of diet in young children with an emphasis on fruit and vegetable intake: using CADET--Child and Diet Evaluation Tool. Public Health Nutr 2006;9:501-8. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2005871
  19. Christian MS, Evans CEL, Nykjaer C, Hancock N, Cade JE. Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7
  20. Evans C, Hutchinson J, Christian MS, Hancock N, Cade JE. Measures of low food variety and poor dietary quality in a cross-sectional study of London school children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018;72:1497-505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0070-1
  21. Christian MS, Evans CEL, Nykjaer C, Hancock N, Cade JE. Measuring diet in primary school children aged 8-11 years: validation of the Child and Diet Evaluation Tool (CADET) with an emphasis on fruit and vegetable intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:234-41. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.160
  22. Nekitsing C, Blundell-Birtill P, Cockroft JE, Hetherington MM. Taste exposure increases intake and nutrition education increased willingness to try an unfamiliar vegetable in preschool children: a cluster randomized trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2019;119:2004-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2019.05.012
  23. Appleton KM, Hemingway A, Rajska J, Hartwell H. Repeated exposure and conditioning strategies for increasing vegetable liking and intake: systematic review and meta-analyses of the published literature. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108:842-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy143
  24. Zeinstra GG, Vrijhof M, Kremer S. Is repeated exposure the holy grail for increasing children's vegetable intake? Lessons learned from a Dutch childcare intervention using various vegetable preparations. Appetite 2018;121:316-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.087
  25. Wardle J, Herrera ML, Cooke L, Gibson EL. Modifying children's food preferences: the effects of exposure and reward on acceptance of an unfamiliar vegetable. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:341-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601541
  26. Fildes A, van Jaarsveld CHM, Wardle J, Cooke L. Parent-administered exposure to increase children's vegetable acceptance: a randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014;114:881-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.040
  27. Poelman AAM, Delahunty CM, de Graaf C. Vegetables and other core food groups: a comparison of key flavour and texture properties. Food Qual Prefer 2017;56:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.004
  28. Cervato-Mancuso AM, Westphal MF, Araki EL, Bogus CM. School feeding programs' role in forming eating habits. Rev Paul Pediatr 2013;31:324-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822013000300008
  29. Cooke L. The importance of exposure for healthy eating in childhood: a review. J Hum Nutr Diet 2007;20:294-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00804.x
  30. Aguilar FV. Rice in the Filipino diet and culture. PIDS discussion paper series, No. 2005-15 [Internet]. Makati: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS); 2005 [cited 2020 April 2]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/127896.
  31. Caragay RN. Dietary pattern in a Philippine village: its determinants and improvement. Jpn J Health Hum Ecol 1985;51:224-38. https://doi.org/10.3861/jshhe.51.224
  32. Gonzales JT, Raaij JV, Narciso ZV. Consumption pattern for fruits and vegetables of some Filipino adolescents in selected public schools in the city of Manila. J Nutr Disord Ther 2016;6:1000202.
  33. Ransley JK, Taylor EF, Radwan Y, Kitchen MS, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Does nutrition education in primary schools make a difference to children's fruit and vegetable consumption? Public Health Nutr 2010;13:1898-904. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010000595
  34. Pem D, Jeewon R. Fruit and vegetable intake: benefits and progress of nutrition education interventionsnarrative review article. Iran J Public Health 2015;44:1309-21.
  35. Yeom MY, Cho YO. Nutrition education discouraging sugar intake results in higher nutrient density in diets of pre-school children. Nutr Res Pract 2019;13:434-43. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2019.13.5.434
  36. Choi ES, Shin NR, Jung EI, Park HR, Lee HM, Song KH. A study on nutrition knowledge and dietary behavior of elementary school children in Seoul. Nutr Res Pract 2008;2:308-16. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2008.2.4.308
  37. Perez-Rodrigo C, Aranceta J. School-based nutrition education: lessons learned and new perspectives. Public Health Nutr 2001;4:131-9. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2000108
  38. Alamri E. Factors affecting food intake and the role of nutrition education in the understanding and implementation of healthy dietary habits in Saudi adolescent girls [doctoral thesis]. Plymouth: University of Plymouth; 2017.
  39. Moxley RL, Jicha KA, Thompson GH. Testing the importance of family solidarity, community structure, information access, and social capital in predicting nutrition health knowledge and food choices in the Philippines. Ecol Food Nutr 2011;50:215-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2011.568907
  40. Celik Ates H, Ceylan M. Effects of socio-economic factors on the consumption of milk, yoghurt, and cheese: insights from Turkey. Br Food J 2010;112:234-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701011029110
  41. Jenco M. AHA: limit children's sugar consumption to 6 teaspoons per day [Internet]. Itasca (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics; 2016 [cited 2020 March 2]. Available from: https://www. aappublications.org/news/2016/08/23/Sugar082316.
  42. Adamo KB, Brett KE. Parental perceptions and childhood dietary quality. Matern Child Health J 2014;18:978-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1326-6