디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.201-209
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

가상현실 기반 국방 교육훈련체계 사업화 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구

(A) Study on the Priority Selection for business development of the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality

  • 투고 : 2022.01.09
  • 심사 : 2022.03.20
  • 발행 : 2022.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

군(軍)이 가상현실 기술을 다양한 교육훈련체계에 도입을 검토하여 충분히 활용하기 위해서는 해당 기술 및 교육체계의 특성을 반영하는 사업화 특성에 대한 정확한 파악과 선별적인 적용이 중요할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 가상현실 기반의 교육훈련체계 사업화 시 고려해야 할 요인들에 대해서 AHP(Analitic Hierarchy Process)기법을 통해 평가기준을 선정하고 추진 과제들의 우선순위를 판단해보았다. 선행연구를 기초로 초기 AHP 모델을 구성하여 레벨 1의 평가 기준으로 현실성 등 6개 요소에 대한 상대적인 중요도를 분석하였다. 다음으로 레벨 2는 6개의 평가 기준에 11개 과제별 중요도의 확인을 위해 각각의 평가 기준을 대상으로 분석하여 과제별 우선순위를 선정하였다. 분석결과 레벨 1에서는 현실성 및 파급성이 다른 요소에 비해 높은 중요도를 나타내었다. 최종 상대적 중요도를 평가한 결과는 ① 비행훈련, ② 재난훈련, ③ 포탄 사격, ④ 차량 운전 순으로 우선순위가 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 모델의 레벨 1과 2에서 결정된 상대적 우선순위를 바탕으로 국방 가상현실 과제 연구 우선순위의 최종 의사결정에 필요한 사업별 중요도를 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 국방 분야의 교육훈련체계 사업화에 대한 우선순위 선정에 참고자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

In order for the military to review the introduction of virtual reality technology into various education and training systems and fully utilize it, it is important to reflect the characteristics of the technology and education system and to accurately identify and selectively apply the characteristics of commercialization. In this study, the evaluation criteria were selected through the Analitic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for factors to be considered when commercializing a virtual reality-based education and training system, and the priorities of the projects were determined. Based on previous studies, an initial AHP model was constructed and the relative importance of six factors, including reality, was analyzed as the level 1 evaluation criteria. Next, for Level 2, each evaluation criterion was evaluated to confirm the importance of each of the 11 tasks in the six evaluation criteria, and priorities were selected for each task. As a result of the analysis, level 1 showed that reality and ripple had higher importance than other factors. As a result of evaluating the final relative importance, the priority was shown in the order of ① flight training, ② disaster training, ③ shooting Training, and ④ driving a vehicle. Based on the relative priorities determined in Levels 1 and 2 of the model presented in this study, the importance of each project necessary for final decision-making of the research priorities for the defense virtual reality project was presented. It is expected that this study can be used as a reference material for prioritizing the commercialization of education and training systems in the defense sector.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. H. Moon & H. J. Kang. (2020). Analysis of usage in education and training field using XR, Digital Contents Industry Headquarters, NIPA. Issue Report(19).
  2. K. Y. Kim. (2020). An Exploratory Study on The Effects of Early AR Users' Attributes on AR Contents Adoption and Usage. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 20(4), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.04.038
  3. E. J. Song (2018). Virtual Reality Industry Analysis and How to Activate. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering. 22(4), 656-663. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2018.22.4.656
  4. S. H. Lee, S. J. Han & K. H. PARK. (2020). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality. Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems, 15(6), 1117-1133. https://doi.org/10.34163/JKITS.2020.15.6.019
  5. S. Aukstakalnis. (2017). Practical augmented reality: a guide to the technologies, applications and human factors for AR and VR, Pearson Education, Inc.
  6. H. S. Jung, K. K. Kim & D. W. Hyun. (2021). Analysis of Priorities of Policy Implementation Tasks for Revitalizing Virtual Reality(VR) and Augmented Reality(AR) Industries. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 21(9), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.09.012
  7. S. H. Lee. (2020). Study on the factors affecting the priority selection for introducing the system and the intention to use the Virtual Reality-based defense education training system, Chungnam National University Ph.D. Thesis.
  8. M. H. Park, S. S. Lee, K. S. Jeon & H. J. Seol. (2019). A Study on the Development Direction of Education and Training System based on AR/VR Technology. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 22(4).
  9. S. Park, S. H. Kim, J. Park & J. Na. (2011). A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for Selecting Defense Core Technology Tasks Using AHP. Joural of Korea Association of Industrial Business Administration Summer Conference.
  10. J. D. Lee, C. J. Lee, W. J. Jang & H. S. Park (2004). The Process of R&D, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 30(2).
  11. S. J. Han. (2020). Study of Deriving Military Weather-Modification Technologies Suitable for Korean Environment and It's Establishment. Chungnam National University Ph.D. Thesis.
  12. J. S. Bang & E. J. Choi. (2017). AR(Augmented Reality) Internal and external technology trends and development prospects. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information Emerging Issue Report 16.
  13. B. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, K. Y. Shin, D. W. Kim, W. W. Lee & N. H. Kim. (2018). A study on the actual precision shooting training based on virtual reality. Convergence security journal. 18(4), 62-71.
  14. Saaty, R. W. (1987), "The Analytic HierarchyProcess-What It Is and How It Used,"Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  15. S. Y. Yu. (2012). A Study on Evaluation Model of Business Process Management Systems based on Analytical Hierarchy Process. Management & Information Systems Review. 31(4), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2012.31.4.018
  16. Y. S. Nam & H. S. Im. (2011). A Study for MICE Multiplex location attributes which use AHP. The Geographical Journal of Korea. 45(4), 125-136.
  17. S. J. Park & C. Go. (2011). Analysis of Key Factors in Operational Control Transition Resolution using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Journal of Digital Convergence. 9(6), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.6.153
  18. S. H. Lee, S. B. Park, H. W. Yang, S. J. Han (2020). (A) Study on the Pr ior ity Selection for business development of the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality, The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Conference. 5,920-5,925.
  19. M. C. Kim, Y. C. Jang, & S. G. Lee. (2013) Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 128, 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.049
  20. Lirn, T. C. (2004) An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  21. S. J. Han & S. M. Lee. (2019) The Quantification of Considerations related with Decision-making in Ground Operation : Focusing on Evaluating Avenues of Approach in IPB, Journal of convergence security, 19(2), 129-136.
  22. T. L. Saaty. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP. In The analytic hierarchy process. 59-67.
  23. H. Kang, S. Kim, T. Lee, M. Jang and A. Lee (2021). Examining the Strategic Priorities for Smart City Project with Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on a Survey of Potential Residents. Journal of Digital Convergence. 19(12), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.12.243
  24. T. L. Saaty. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  25. Y. K. Chung, & S. S. Lee. (2013). A Study on Development Strategy of Korean Hidden Champion Firm Utilizing the SWOT/AHP Technique. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.8.3.201309.97
  26. K. T. Kim, J. H. Han & H. E. Lee. (2020). A Case Study on Safety Measures for Users Experiencing the Virtual Reality - Focusing on Experiential Space for Immersive Virtual Reality. Journal of Korea Intitute of Spatial Design, 15(3), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.35216/KISD.2020.15.3.161
  27. J. W. Hong. (2017). Considerations and suggestions for virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), The magazine of KIICE 18(1), 36-42