대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제38권3호
  • /
  • Pages.59-70
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국, 미국 및 일본 의료기관 재난대비계획의 비교연구

Disaster Preparedness Plans for Medical Institutions in Korea, the United States and Japan

  • Kim, Young-Aee (Dept. of Medical Space Design and Management, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Rim (Dept. of Finance and Insurance, Mokpo National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.17
  • 심사 : 2022.03.18
  • 발행 : 2022.03.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

When disaster strikes, medical institutions play a vital role in protecting the health and life of patients. Prior to a catastrophe, it is necessary to establish a disaster mitigation activity plan to effectively respond during an onset and to quickly secure business continuity to prevent irreversible damage. This study aims to provide direction in the event of a disaster pertaining to risk assessments and business continuity plans by comparing the current tools and guidelines of medical institutions in the United States, Japan, and Korea. Among the hazard vulnerability assessments conducted by medical institutions in the United States, the Hazard Risk Assessment Instrument, Hazard and Vulnerability Analysis by Kaizer Permanente, and the Pennsylvania Public Health Risk Assessment Tool were examined. The medical Business Continuity Plan in Japan, and the National Infrastructure Protection Plan in Korea were also analyzed. The results of this research indicated that according to the Disaster and Safety Act, the preparedness plan should include medical institutions, not just emergency medical services. It is essential for risk vulnerability assessments and business continuity plans to seek varying tactics and approaches. Additionally, major risks and key management risks should be prepared in advance and assessed through data accumulation.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2021년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호2020R1A2C1-100849

참고문헌

  1. ASPR. (2016). 2017-2022 Health Care Preparedness and Response Capabilities.
  2. ASPR TRACIE. (2018). ASPR TRACIE Evaluation of Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Tools. 1-6. Retrieved August 16, 2021 from https://files.asprtracie.hhs.gov
  3. Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health. (2020). Business continuity plan guidelines for disaster preparedness hospitals. Tokyo Metropolitan Government. Retrieved September 21, 2021 from https://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.lg.jp
  4. California Hospital Association. (2019). Hospital Emergency Management Program Checklist. Retrieved August 20, 2021 from https://www.calhospitalprepare.org
  5. Campbell, P. Trockman, S., & Walker, A. (2011). Strengthening Hazard Vulnerability Analysis: Results of Recent Research in Maine, Public Health Reports, 126, 291-293.
  6. Department of Health. (2014). Health Building Note 00-07: Planning for a resilient healthcare estate. 8-11. Retrieved September 10, 2021 from https://www.england.nhs.uk
  7. FGI Emergency Conditions Committee. (2021). Guidance for Designing Health and Residential Care Facilities that Respond and Adapt to Emergency Conditions. 1-17. Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://fgiguidelines.org
  8. Ha, K. M. (2009). Establishing the National Response Framework in Korea. National Institute For Disaster Prevention. Annual Report. 7-22.
  9. Jeon, C.W., Jeong, U.Y., & Cheung, C.S. (2020). A comparative study on NIPP and COOP, Journal of the Society of Disaster Information. 16(1), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.15683/KOSDI.2020.3.31.192
  10. Kaiser Permanente. (2020). Hazard Vulnerability Analysis tool and instruction sheet. kp_incident_log_hva_3.0_6-2020_template-Exel
  11. Kaya, G., Ward, J., & Clarson, J. (2018). A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 1-9
  12. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2013) Health Hazard Assessment & Prioritization Instrument -Exel, Retrieved August 10, 2021 from http://publichealth.lacounty.gov
  13. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. (2021). Disaster prevention work plan. Retrieved September 25, 2021 from https://www.mhlw.go.jp
  14. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. (2019). BCP formulation status survey results of Hospital business continuity plan. 2019. 07.31 press release. Retrieved August 25, 2021 from https://www.mhlw.go.jp
  15. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2018). Guidelines for national infrastructure protection Plan. Appendix 2.2. Retrieved October 3, 2021 from https://opengov.seoul.go.kr
  16. Oguchi, K., Yoshida, O., & Kato, K. (2017). Action Card for Hospital Business Continuity Plan, World Medical Publishing, Tokyo.
  17. Sasaki, M. (2019). Hospital BCP that can be used, Emerging Medical Publishing Company, Tokyo.
  18. Song, C.Y., & Kim, D.H. (2018). Improvement proposals for the guidelines for the national infrastructure protection plan, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 18(5) 193-201. https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2018.18.5.193
  19. The Drexel University School of Public Health: Center for Public Health Readiness and Communication. (2013) The Pennsylvania Public Health Risk Assessment Tool., PHRAT Guide & PHRAT Tool-Exel, 3-37.
  20. The UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters. (2006) Hazard Risk Assessment Instrument (HRAI). Retrieved July 10, 2021 from https://fachc.memberclicks.net
  21. Tohoku University Hospital. (2021). Medical BCP. Tohoku University Hospital BCP Committee
  22. Yamashita Sekkei Hospital Building Project Team A. (2016). Road to Hospital Architecture Specialist, Building Technology Co., Ltd. Tokyo. 180~195