융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수준별 학습을 없앤다면? 다수준 영어 수업에 대한 교수자의 인식

What Happens When We Get Rid of Levels? Instructors' Perceptions of Mixed-Ability EFL Courses

  • 정선주 (가천대학교 영미어문학과)
  • Chung, Sun Joo (Department of English Language and Literature, Gachon University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.10
  • 심사 : 2022.03.20
  • 발행 : 2022.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국 대학에서 외국어로서의 영어교육 환경에서 다수준 수업을 진행하는 강사들의 다수준 수업에 대한 인식과 각기 다른 영어 능력과 교육적 요구가 있는 학생들을 가르칠 때 강사들이 활용한 교수전략에 대해서 알아보고자 한다. 이를 위해 한국의 한 대학에서 교양영어수업을 담당하는 스무 명의 교수자가 설문지에 참여하였고, 그 중 세 명은 후속 면담에 참여하였다. 설문지와 후속 면담의 결과에 따르면 교수자들이 인식한 다수준 수업의 경험은 긍정적이었다. 교수자들은 학생들을 동기부여하기 위해서 수업 참여에 대한 명확한 지침을 제시하였고, 그룹 활동을 통해 높은 수준의 학생들이 낮은 수준의 학생들을 도울 수 있다는 점을 알게 되었다. 또한 학생들의 다수준 수업에서 학생들의 교육적 요구를 만족시키기 위해서 특수목적영어교육이 필요할 것 같다고 하였다.

The present study aims to investigate how general education EFL instructors who teach in a higher education institution in Korea perceive mixed-ability classes and the teaching strategies that they utilized to teach learners who have varying English proficiency levels and may have different instructional needs. Twenty instructors at a higher education institution in Korea who teach general education EFL courses participated in a questionnaire and three of the twenty instructors participated in follow-up interviews. The findings from the questionnaire and interviews showed that instructors' experiences teaching mixed-ability classes were positive. They offered clear guidelines for participation to help motivate learners and found that higher level students helped lower level students through group work. The instructors also felt that ESP could be a possibility in mixed-ability classes to meet the learners educational needs.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Gachon University research fund of 2020(GCU-202003510001).

참고문헌

  1. J. M. Nam. (2017). A study on the satisfaction and effectiveness of general English: Focusing on the comparison of students' and instructors' perceptions. Journal of Language Sciences, 24(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2017.24.1.047
  2. M. A. Ha. (2010). A study on learner satisfaction on college English programs. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 9(2), 269-299. https://doi.org/10.18649/jkees.2010.9.2.269
  3. M.-A. Ha. (2018). A study on students' and professors' perceptions on level-differentiated college English classes taught by native English-speaking professors. Modern Studies in English Language & Literature, 62(1), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.17754/MESK.62.1.223
  4. J. Han. (2020). A study on students' satisfaction with university English programs. Culture and Convergence, 42(8), 89-114.
  5. M. Kim. (2012). A study on the learners' perceptions and efficiency of general English program. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 103, 159-181.
  6. Y. Kim & J. Y. Yi. (2009). A study on students' and teachers' perceptions towards level-differentiated general English classes in the university. English Teaching, 64(4), 337-368. https://doi.org/10.15858/ENGTEA.64.4.200912.337
  7. D. K. Jung. (2010). Level differentiated education in college English education: Focused on Hanyang University's curriculum. Journal of General Education, 4(1), 177-197.
  8. H. O. Kim & H. K. Lee. (2010). Implementing a level-specific general English program at a tertiary level. English Language Teaching, 22(4), 75-101. https://doi.org/10.17936/pkelt.2010.22.4.004
  9. C. Park. (2013). A study of the effects of a level-specific general English program: Focused on students' and teachers' perceptions. Studies in Linguistics, 29, 105-131. https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..29.201310.105
  10. J. Joh. (2002). Towards a more successful college English program: A survey of teachers and students. English Teaching, 57(2), 365-394.
  11. K. Sung, K. H. Pyo & H. M. Lee. (2004). Developing a level-specific English cultural curriculum in the university. Foreign Languages Education, 11(2), 377-406.
  12. Y. J. Bang. (2004). Certification of English proficiency, proficiency-based curriculum, and college English program: A consideration of students' and teachers' perceptions. English Language & Literature Teaching, 9(2), 193-211.
  13. H. O. Kim. (2007). A comparison of instructors' and students' perceptions of the general English program at tertiary level. Foreign Languages Education, 14(3), 179-205.
  14. H. Song. (2008). A study of students' satisfaction for a university English conversation program utilizing outside classroom activities. Foreign Languages Education, 15(3), 141-168.
  15. P. P. Q. Na. (2007). Some strategies for teaching English to multi-level adult ESL learners: A challenging experience in Australia. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 306-322.
  16. S. Hallam & J. Ireson. (2005). Secondary school teachers' pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes. Research Papers in Education, 20(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152052000341318
  17. Y. Lou, P. C. Abrami, J. C. Spence, C. Poulsen, B. Chambers & S. d'Apollonia. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004423
  18. J. Ireson, S. Hallam, S. Hack, H. Clark & I. Plewis. (2002). Ability grouping in English secondary schools: effects on attainment in English, mathematics and science. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(3), 299-318. DOI : 10.1076/edre.8.3.299.3854
  19. H. MacIntyre & J. Ireson. (2002). Within-class ability grouping: Placement of pupils in groups and self-concept. British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 249-263. DOI : 10.1080/01411920120122176s
  20. J. Bruzzese & N. Dedmon. (1997). A baker's dozen: Reasons for individualized math classes. Connections: A Journal of Adult Literacy, 7, 46.
  21. S. Maddalena. (2002). Using high level students as teaching assistants in a mixed ability classroom. TESL-EJ, 6(1).
  22. N. Hess. (2001). Teaching large multi-level classes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. J. Bell. (1994). Teaching multi-level classes in ESL. Markham, ON: Dominie.
  24. Y. J. Kim. (2015). A study on differentiated English classes in college. English Language Teaching, 27(3), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.17936/PKELT.2015.27.3.005
  25. J. M. Cortina. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  26. P. Marying. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution; Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR): Klagenfurt, Austria, (Online): https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517 (accessed on 20 March 2021).