Acknowledgement
이 논문은 2021년도 특허청(한국발명진흥회)의 지원에 의하여 연구된 것임
References
- Altay, M., & Akar, S. (2014). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' views on model-eliciting. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 345-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.219
- Arshad, A., Halim, L., & Nasri, N. (2021). Impact of integrating science and engineering teaching approach on students achievement: A meta analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.29839
- Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-393
- Chi, M., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to process: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
- Choi, S. (2009). Teacher's curriculum development based on students' preconception: Focusing on application of the cognitive conflict process model to electricity unit in elementary school science curriculum. (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University Graduate School, Seoul.
- Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., Brennan, R., Kelly, G., Tunis, C., & Gentry, C. (2020). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 423-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21601
- Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M
- Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers' understanding of students' science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
- Guzey, S., & Jung, J. (2021). Productive thinking and science learning in design teams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10057-x
- Ha, S., & Lee, K. (2015). Hermeneutics and science education: Focus on implications for conceptual change theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.1.0085
- Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
- Hong, H., Kim, J., Choi, B., & Lee, J. (2012). Conceptual understanding process for electric circuit of elementary science-gifted students using dynamic science assessment. The Korean Society for the Gifted, 22(3), 703-728.
- Huh, M., Nam, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Meta-analysis on the effect of elementary invention education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2021.27.1.006
- Im, J., Lee, S., & Yang, I. (2010). Analysis of elementary school teachers' laboratory instruction process through experiments from science laboratory and engineering laboratory. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 515-525.
- Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2020). The effects of experimental activity with computing thinking expression on elementary school students' scientific models. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 70(7), 595-602. https://doi.org/10.3938/npsm.70.595
- Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2021). Development of experimental guide materials for algorithmic expression-Focusing on magnetic properties experiment. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 40(3), 326-342. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2021.40.3.326
- Khan, M., & Khan, S. (2011). Data and information visualization methods, and interactive mechanisms: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5120/2004-2701
- Kim, H. (2007). Development and verification of the invention education model applied with TRIZ techniques. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.17055/JPAER.2014.20.4.61
- Kim, H. (2020). The effect of 'gravitational acceleration measuring device' inventing education program using arduino's various sensors on science-gifted elementary school students' creative problem solving and attitude towards science. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 1101-1122. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.17.1101
- Kim, J., & Moon, S. (2009). Development of practical arts education program for the improvement of elementary school children's interest in the invention using TRIZ method. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 93-114.
- Kim, M., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2018). Meta-analysis of educational effects in invention education programs. School Science Journal, 12(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.12.1.201802.139
- Korea Invention Promotion Association (2014). Interesting story of Dr. Tongtong's invention using the TRIZ technique. Korea Invention Promotion Association, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office (2017). Act on the activation and support of invention education(Enacted on March 14, 2017, Act No. 14590).
- Krajcik, J., McNeill, K., & Reiser, B. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240
- Kwon, H., & Park, K. (2009). Engineering design: A facilitator for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, Journal of Science Education, 33, 207-219. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2009.33.2.207
- Kwon, H., Lee E., & Lee, D. (2016). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of invention education in South Korea: Creativity, attitude, and tendency for problem solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.48
- Kwon, J. (1992). How to diagnose for children's misconception of science? Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 173-180.
- Lee, B., Shim, K., & Kim, H. (2017). Perception of science educators about invention education in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.1.0017
- Lee, C. (2013). Analysis of contents related to the invention in elementary school textbooks according to the 2007 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(3), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2013.19.3.23
- Lee, H., & Nam, Y. (2019). Development and application of engineering based engineering.science integrated program for teaching the concept of 'light' and 'sound'. School Science Journal, 13(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.3.201908.211
- Lee, H., Kim, A., & Hong, Y. (2010). 'My creative thermometer' program for the gifted in elementary science. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 14(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2010.14.3.453
- Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, G., & Oh, H. (2014). Development and application of integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education model based on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.2.0063
- Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2010). The development and application effect of IDEAL-TRIZ learning program to improve technological problem-solving capability for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(2), 213-233.
- Lee, K., Lew, K., & Han, Y. (2016). The effect of DHA-I program based on TRIZ to improve creativity and confluence problem solving ability of lower grade elementary school children. The Journal of Creativity Education, 16(3), 97-111.
- Lee, M., & Jeon, J. (2020). Recognition and education needs of the invention education of elementary school teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(3), 87-118. https://doi.org/10.29113/skpaer.2020.26.3.005
- Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2012). Pedagogical methodology of teaching activity-based flow chart for elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 16(4), 489-501.
- Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20111
- Lohse, G., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., & Rueter, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/198366.198376
- Lou, S., Shih, R., Tseng, K., Diez, C., & Tsai, H. (2010). How to promote knowledge transfer through a problem-based learning internet platform for vocational high school students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 539-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.489938
- McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). A sustained multidimensional conceptual change intervention in grade 9 and 10 science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 703-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1725174
- Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015a). National practical course/computer and information curriculum No. 2015-74.
- Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015b). National science curriculum No. 2015-74.
- Moon, S., & Kim, O. (2011). The development of an invention education program using the wise life textbook for children's creativity. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.2.333
- Moore, T. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: A case-based approach for getting students interested in material science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5-6), 295-310.
- Mun, K., Hwang, Y., & Yang, D. (2020). Development of science-art integrated program and exploration of conceptual understanding: Focused on light concept for elementary school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 24(3), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2020.24.3.319
- Nesmith, S., & Cooper, S. (2021). Connecting engineering design and inquiry cycles: Impact on elementary preservice teachers' engineering efficacy and perspectives toward teaching engineering. School Science and Mathematics, 121(5), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12469
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
- Noh, J., Son, J. Jeon, J. Song, J., & Kim, J. (2019). The effects of step-by-step question-based unit design on elementary school students' understanding of 'seasonal change' concept. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2019.12.2.151
- Park, J. (2012). A survey of elementary-students' concepts about electric circuits. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(8), 848-855. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.848
- Park, K., & Park, H. (2018). Analysis of research trend on conceptual change in earth science. The Korean Earth Science Society, 39(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.2.193
- Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). Current status and strategy for development of invention education in elementary school-Based at science, practical art and arts subjects. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(1), 132-133.
- Park, W., & Park, I. (2015). Development of an elementary invention program on the basis of fabricating activity for a simple gravimeter and its application to science classes. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 26(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.26.1.201503.175
- Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
- Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
- Radloff, J., & Capobianco, B. (2021). Investigating elementary teachers' tensions and mitigating strategies related to integrating engineering design-based science instruction. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9844-x
- Reddy, M., & Panacharoensawad, B. (2017). Students problem-solving difficulties and implications in physics: An empirical study on influencing factors. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 59-62.
- Roth, W. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1031
- Rubaitun, R. (2018). Implementation of model-eliciting activities to improve the ability of mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(3), 312-317. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v1i3.p312-317
- Seidman, I. (2009). Interviewing as a qualitative research. NY: Teacgers College Press.
- Self, B., Miller, R., Kean, A., Moore, T., Ogletree, T., & Schreiber, F. (2008). Important student misconceptions in mechanics and thermal science: Identification using model-eliciting activities. 38th ASEE/IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Frontiers in Education Conference.
- Seo, S., Jin, S., Jeong, S., & Kwon, J. (2002). Elementary students' cognitive conflict through discussion and physical experience in learning of electric circuit. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 862-871.
- Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/23/2/004
- Smith, J., Disessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
- Smith, K., & Burghardt, D. (2007). Teaching engineering at the K-12 level: Two perspectives. The Technology Teacher, 66(7), 20-24.
- Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109.
- Son, J., & Kim, J. (2015). Effects of diagnostic and formative assessment using equivalent test on elementary science classes: Focused on the 'earth and moon' unit. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.4.0619
- Son, J., & Lee, B. (2017). Analysis of relevance of Korean and foreign science curricula and invention. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 651-658. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.4.651
- Song, J., Kang, S., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J., Min, B., Park, S., Bae, S., Son, Y., Son, J., Oh, P., Lee, J., Lee, H., Iim, H., Jeong, D., Jong, J., Kim, J., & Joung, Y. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills-Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Tsai, C. (2003). Using a conflict map and an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145756
- Vidic, N., Ozaltin, N., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. (2014). Model eliciting activities motivated problem solving process: Solution path analysis. American Society for Engineering Education, 24.911.1-24.911.19.
- Wulandari, A. (2018). Correlation between critical thinking and conceptual understanding of student's learning outcome in mechanics concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 020028). AIP Publishing LLC.
- Wulandari, A., Agustina, N., Hidayati, Y., & Tsulutsya, F. (2019). Increasing students' problem-solving ability on the pressure concept through model-eliciting activities(MEAs). In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2202, No. 1, p. 020058). AIP Publishing LLC.
- Yoon, J., Han, K., & Nam, Y. (2019). An analysis of the characteristics of elementary science gifted students' problem solving through model eliciting activity(MEA). Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2019.12.1.64
- Yu, G., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.