DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

응급수혈을 위한 비예기 항체의 국내·외 실태조사

Investigation of Domestic and Foreign Unexpected Antibodies for Emergency Blood Transfusion

  • 황원주 (부산대학교병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 이상희 (서울아산병원 진단검사의학과) ;
  • 박창은 (남서울대학교 임상병리학과.분자진단연구소)
  • Weonjoo, Hwang (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Sang-Hee, Lee (Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Chang-Eun, Park (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Molecular Diagnostics Research Institute, Namseoul University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.17
  • 심사 : 2022.12.03
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31

초록

환자의 긴급 상황에서 수혈 시 일부 수혈 전 검사를 수행하지 않는다. 수혈 후 항체 선별검사를 실시하여 용혈성 수혈 반응을 일으키는 비예기 항체의 실태를 조사를 비교평가하기 위해 국내·외에 보고된 공시자료를 포함하여 조사하였다. 2014~2016년 P병원에서 항체 선별 검사 68,602건과 항체 동정검사 528건을 선정하였다. 68,602건 중 1,198건(1.74%)이 양성이며 Rh계열 161건(30.49%), Lewis계열 67건(12.69%), 기타(Di (a)등) 28건(5.30%)으로 나타났다. Anti-E는 93건(17.61%), c는 13건(2.46%)이다. 국내·외 공시자료 중 국내 경우는 2007년 이전에는 Anti-E 196건(22.45%), Anti-Le(a) 82건(9.39%) Anti-E+c 60건(6.87%)으로 조사되었지만 2008년 이후에는 Anti-E 107건(17.12%), Anti-E+c 56건(8.96%), Anti-Di (a) 28건(4.48%)으로 조사되었다. 한편 다른 국내의 경우는 S병원(2012~2015년)에는 Anti-E, Anti-Le (a), Anti-E+c이며Anti-E+c이며 D병원(2016~2017년)에는 Anti-E, Anti-D Anti-E+c,Anti-E+c, Anti-C+e로 조사되었다. Saudi의 경우는 Anti-D, Anti-E, Anti-Jk (a)순이며, India 경우는 Anti-M, Anti-N, Anti-Le (a), Anti-D로 조사되었다. 권역별 외상센터 개설 전후시기에 응급수혈요청의 빈도 비교에서는 1.8배 이상이 증가한 것으로 조사되었다. 결론적으로 장기간의 항체분포로 효율성을 검증할 수는 없었지만 수혈의 안전성을 높이고 응급 수혈 상황에서 용혈성 수혈 부작용을 줄일 수 있는 대안을 위해 기초 정보를 제공하고 추가적인 검증연구가 필요할것으로 사료된다.

Certain pre-transfusion tests are not commonly performed during emergency blood transfusion. In this study, we reviewed and analyzed the data of post-blood transfusion antibody screening tests to establish the effects of unexpected antibodies causing hemolytic transfusion reactions. We reviewed information published domestically and internationally, and selected the data of 68,602 antibody screening tests and 528 antibody identification tests conducted at P hospital. We found that unexpected antibody positive (1198,1.74%), Rh type (161, 30.49%), Lewis type (67, 12.69%), others (Di (a), 28, 5.30%). The anti-E type positive was 93 (17.61%), and that of the cases with anti-C (13, 2.46%). Only data of domestic cases were included for analysis that were published before 2007, which established the presence of antibodies of the following types and numbers of cases: anti-E (196, 22.45%), anti-Le a (82, 9.39%), and anti-E+C (60, 6.87%). In 2018, anti-E (107, 17.12%), anti-E+Canti-E+C (56, 8.96%), and anti-Di a (28, 4.48%) were detected. In other domestic cases, S hospital was detect to anti-E, anti-Le a, anti-E+C. The Anti-E, anti-D, anti-E+C, and anti-C+E were detected in D hospital. In Saudi Arabia, Anti-D, anti-E, and anti-Jka was detected. The Anti-M, Anti-N, Anti-Le (a), and Anti-D were detected in India. Requests for emergency blood transfusion increased 1.8 times after the opening of the trauma center. This study has the disadvantage of being a cross-sectional study. additional studies are needed to provide basic information on alternative treatments that can increase the safety and reduce the side effects of hemolytic transfusion in emergency transfusion situations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lim YA. Advances in pre-transfusion testing and immunohematology. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2022;33:77-87. https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2022.33.2.77
  2. Kim N, Lee J, Kim DS, Lee HS, Choi SI, Cho YG. Elimination of causative antibody by plasma exchange in a patient with an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2018;29:79-85. https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2018.29.1.79
  3. Pathak S, Chandrashekhar M, Wankhede GR. Type and screen policy in the blood bank: Is AHG cross-match still required? A study at a multispecialty corporate hospital in India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2011;5:153-156. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.83242
  4. Chaudhary R, Agarwal N. Safety of type and screen method compared to conventional antiglobulin crossmatch procedures for compatibility testing in Indian setting. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2011;5:157-159. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.83243
  5. Kim HR, Kim HH. Applied the "Type and Screen" method based on antibody screening test including Dia cells and immediate spin crossmatch to all patients who received transfusion for five years. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2013 24:258-264.
  6. Park SJ, Bae IC, Park YH, Park IC, Kim SH, Kim HO. The usage of uncrossmatched gGroup O, Rh-negative RBCs for emergency transfusion. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2007;18:9-14.
  7. Lee HJ, Jo SY, Shin KH, Song D, Lee SM, Kim IS, et al. Analysis of unexpected antibodies detected in children: a single center study for 7 years. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2015;26:249-256. https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2015.26.3.249
  8. Kim JJ. Frequencies and distributions of unexpected antibodies at a general hospital in the Daejeon of Korea. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2018;50:354-358. https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2018.50.3.354
  9. Waggiallah HA, Alenzi FQ, Bin Shaya AS, Hattan Hattan A, Mohammed Elmosaad Y, Alenazi MM. The prevalence of unexpected antibodies in Saudi's plasma prior blood transfusion and their association with clinical conditions: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:4699-4703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.083
  10. Solanki A, Chandra T, Singh A. Prevalence of red blood cell antibodies in whole blood donors: a single-centre experience in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152:280-284. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_296_19
  11. Chong M, Lee KT, Cho YK. Survey of unexpected antibodies identified at a general hospital in Jeju. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2017;49:390-394. https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2017.49.4.390
  12. Kang HJ, Ihm CH, Lee MH, Hyun SH, Kim IS. The frequency and distribution of unexpected antibodies at a tertiary hospital in Daejeon. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2010;42:63-70.
  13. Kim DJ, Sung HH, Park CE. Investigation of red cell antiobody screening tests Gyeonggi areas. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2016; 48:36-40. https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2016.48.1.36
  14. Choi HK, Choi KS. Status of blood products release at a general hospital in Gyeonggi-do. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2022;54:73-77. https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2022.54.1.73
  15. Carreras Vescio LA, Torres OW, Virgilio OS, Pizzolato M. Mild hemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-Lewis(a). Vox Sang. 1993;64:194-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.1993.tb05387.x
  16. Delk AA, Gammon RR, Alvarez H, Benitez N, Bright F. A hemolytic transfusion reaction caused by an unexpected Leb antibody. Lab Med. 2021;52:303-306. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaa070