Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제42권5호
  • /
  • Pages.633-647
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design models for predicting the resistance of headed studs in profiled sheeting

  • Vigneri, Valentino (Faculty of Science, Technology & Communication, University of Luxembourg) ;
  • Hicks, Stephen J. (University of Warwick, School of Engineering) ;
  • Taras, Andreas (ETH Zurich, D-BAUG, Institute of Structural Engineering) ;
  • Odenbreit, Christoph (Faculty of Science, Technology & Communication, University of Luxembourg)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.20
  • 심사 : 2022.02.23
  • 발행 : 2022.03.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper presents the results from reliability analyses of the current Eurocode 4 (EN 1994-1-1) and AISC 360-16 design models for predicting the resistance of headed stud shear connectors within profiled steel sheeting, when the ribs are oriented transverse to the supporting beam. For comparison purposes, the performance of the alternative "Luxembourg" and "Stuttgart" model were also considered. From an initial database of 611 push-out tests, 269 cases were included in the study, which ensured that the results were valid over a wide range of geometrical and material properties. It was found that the current EN 1994-1-1 design rules deliver a corrected partial safety factor γM* of around 2.0, which is significantly higher than the target value 1.25. Moreover, 179 tests fell within the domain of the concrete-related failure design equation. Notwithstanding this, the EN 1994-1-1 equations provide satisfactory results for re-entrant profiled sheeting. The AISC 360-16 design equation for steel failure covers 263 of the tests in the database and delivers 𝛾M*≈2.0. Conversely, whilst the alternative "Stuttgart" model provides an improvement over the current codes, only a corrected partial safety factor of 𝛾M*=1.47 is achieved. Finally, the alternative "Luxembourg" design model was found to deliver the required target value, with a corrected partial safety factor 𝛾M* between 1.21 and 1.28. Given the fact that the Luxembourg design model is the only model that achieved the target values required by EN 1990, it is recommended as a potential candidate for inclusion within the second generation of Eurocodes.

키워드

과제정보

Financial support for the first author was provided by ArcelorMittal Global R&D Long Products Luxembourg in the scope of the research project ShearCON under the grant agreement UL-E-AGR-0022-10-C. As Member and Convenor of Project Team CEN/TC250/SC4.T3 between 2015 and 2018, the second and fourth author, respectively acknowledge with thanks the financial support provided by the EU under Grant Agreement SA/CEN/GROW/EFTA/515/2014-02.

참고문헌

  1. AISC 360-16 (2016), AISC 360-16: Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, USA.
  2. Bode, H. and Kunzel, R. (1990), "Zur Verwendung von Profilblechen beim Tragerverbund", Der Metallbau im Konstruktiven Ingenieurbau, Festschrift Rolf Baehre, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  3. Bonilla, J., Bezerra, L.M., Mirambell, E. and Massicotte, B. (2018), "Review of stud shear resistance prediction in steel-concrete composite beams", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.3.355.
  4. Chapman, J.C. (1964), "The behaviour of composite beams in steel and concrete", The Struct. Engineer, 45(4), 115-125.
  5. da Silva, L.S., Tankova, T., Marques, L., Kuhlmann, U., Kleiner, A., Spiegler, J., Snijder, H.H., Dekker, R., Taras, A. and Popa, N. (2017), "13.02: Safety assessment across modes driven by plasticity, stability and fracture", ce/papers, 1(2-3), 3689-3698. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.425.
  6. Doinghaus, P. (2001), "Zum Zusammenwirken hochfester Baustoffe in Verbundtragern", Ph.D. Dissertation, RWHT Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  7. EN 1090-4 (2018), EN 1090-4:2018 - Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures. Part 4: Technical requirements for cold-formed structural steel elements and cold-formed structures for roof, ceiling, floor and wall applications, British Standards Institution; London, UK.
  8. ENV 1993-1-1 (1998), ENV 1993-1-1:1992/A2:1998, CEN (European Committee for Standardization); Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Ernst, S., Bridge, R.Q. and Wheeler, A. (2007), "Strength of Headed Stud Shear Connection in Composite Beams", Australian J. Struct. Eng., 7(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2007.11464969.
  10. Eurocode 0 (2002), Basis of structural design, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  11. Eurocode 2 (2004), Design of concrete structures. Part1-1: General rules and rules for building, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  12. Eurocode 3 (2004), Design of steel structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for building, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  13. Eurocode 4 (2004), Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for building, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  14. fib (2013), fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010, Ersnt and Sohn.
  15. Fisher, J.W. (1970), "Design of Composite Beams with Formed Metal Deck", AISC Eng. J., 7(3), 88-96.
  16. Grant, J.A., Fisher, J.W. and Slutter, R.G. (1977), "Composite beams with formed steel deck", AISC Eng. J., 14(1), 24-43.
  17. Hanswille, G., Porsch, M. and Ustundag, C. (2007), "Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading: Part I: Experimental study", J. Construct. Steel Res., 63(4), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.035.
  18. Hicks, S.J. (2007), "Strength and ductility of headed stud connectors welded in modern profiled steel sheeting", Struct. Eng., 85(10), 32-38.
  19. Hicks, S.J. (2017), "Design shear resistance of headed studs embedded in solid slabs and encasements", J. Construct. Steel Res., 139, 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.018.
  20. Hicks, S.J. and Smith, A.L. (2014), "Stud shear connectors in composite beams that support slabs with profiled steel sheeting", Struct. Eng., 24(2), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686614X13830790993122.
  21. ISO 12491 (1997), ISO 12491:1997 - Statistical methods for quality control of building materials and components, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  22. ISO 13918 (2018), ISO 13918:2018 - Welding - Studs and ceramic ferrules for arc stud welding, British Standards Institution; London, United Kingdom.
  23. Iyengar, S.H. and Zils, J.J. (1973), "Composite floor system for Sears Tower", AISC Eng. J., 10(3), 3rd Quarter.
  24. Jayas, B.S. and Hosain, M.U. (1987), "Behaviour of headed studs in composite beams: push-out tests", Canadian J. Civil Eng., 15(2), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1139/l88-032.
  25. JCSS (2001), Probabilistic model code, Joint Committee on Structural Safety. https://www.jcss-lc.org/.
  26. Johnson, R.P. and Dongjie, H. (1995), "Resistance to longitudinal shear of composite beams with profiled sheeting", Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers-Struct. Buildings, 110(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1995.27600.
  27. Konrad, M., Eggert, F., Kuhlmann, U. and Schorr, J. (2020), "New approach for the design shear resistance of headed studs in profiled steel sheeting with ribs transverse to supporting beam", Steel Construct., 13, 252-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.202170204.
  28. Lloyd, R. and Wright, H.D. (1990), "Shear connection between composite slabs and steel beams", J. Construct. Steel Res., 15(4), 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(90)90050-Q.
  29. M/515 (2012), Mandate for Amending Existing Eurocodes and Extending the Scope of Structural Eurocodes, CEN (European Committee for Standardization); Brussels, Belgium.
  30. Nellinger, S. (2015), "On the behaviour of shear stud connections in composite beams with deep decking", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  31. Nellinger, S., Odenbreit, C., Obiala, R. and Lawson, M. (2017), "Influence of transverse loading onto push-out tests with deep steel decking", J. Construct. Steel Res., 128, 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.021.
  32. Odenbreit, C. and Nellinger, S. (2017), "Mechanical model to predict the resistance of the shear connection in composite beams with deep steel decking", Steel Construct., 10(3), 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201710029.
  33. Ollgaard, J.G., Slutter, R.G. and Fisher, J.W. (1971), "Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete", AISC Eng. J., 71(10), 55-64.
  34. Roik, K. and Burkner, K.E. (1981), "Beitrag zur Tragfahigkeit von Kopfbolzendubeln in Verbundtragern mit Stahlprofilblechen", Bauingenieur, 56(3), 97-101.
  35. Roik, K. and Lungershausen, H. (1989), "Zur Tragfahigkeit von Kopfbolzendubeln in Verbundtragern mit unterbrochener Verbundfuge (Trapezprofildecken)", Der Stahlbau, 58(9), 269-273.
  36. Roik, K., Hanswille, G., Cunze, A. and Lanna, O. (1988), "Report on Eurocode 4 - Clause 6.6.2 Stud connectors", Research Report No. EC4/8/88; Ruhr Universitat Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
  37. Russell, M. J., Clifton, G.C. and Lim, J.B. (2021), "Vertical and horizontal push tests on specimens with a Trefoil decking profile", Structures, 29, 1096-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.064.
  38. Shen, M. and Chung, K. (2017), "Structural Behaviour of Stud Shear Connections with Solid and Composite Slabs Under Co-Existing Shear and Tension Forces", Structures, 9, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.09.011.
  39. Stark, J.W.B. and van Hove, B.W.E.M. (1991), "Statistical analysis of push-out tests on stud connectors in composite steel and concrete structures", Research Report No. BI-91-163; TNO Building and Construction Research, Delft, Netherlands.
  40. Sun, Q., Xin, N.D.M.D., Fan, J. and Liu, W. (2019), "Monotonic and cyclic behavior of headed steel stud anchors welded through profiled steel deck", J. Construct. Steel Res., 157, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.01.022.
  41. Thurlimann, B. (1959), "Fatigue and static strength of stud shear connectors", J. American Concrete Institute, 55(6), 1287-1302.
  42. Viest, I. M. (1956), "Investigation of stud shear connectors for composite concrete and steel T-beams", J. American Concrete Institute, 52(4), 875-892.
  43. Vigneri, V. (2021), "Load bearing mechanisms of headed stud shear connections in profiled steel sheeting transverse to the beam", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  44. Vigneri, V., Hicks, S. and Odenbreit, C. (2021), Push-out Test Database on Headed Studs in Profiled Steel Sheeting Transverse to the Beam with 611 Tests, Mendeley Data, V1. https://doi.org/10.17632/j9pv9s6jzc.1.
  45. Vigneri, V., Odenbreit, C. and Braun, M. V. (2019a), "Numerical evaluation of the plastic hinges developed in headed stud shear connectors in composite beams with profiled steel sheeting", Structures, 21, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.03.017.
  46. Vigneri, V., Odenbreit, C. and Lam, D. (2019b), "Different load bearing mechanisms in headed stud shear connectors for composite beams with profiled steel sheeting", Steel Construction, 12(3), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201900019.