Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Information Literacy Instructions in the Context of IB Extended Essay: Focusing on the application of I-LEARN Model

IB 확장 에세이 맥락에서의 정보활용교육 - I-LEARN 모형 적용을 중심으로 -

  • 정진수 (덕성여자대학교 글로벌융합대학 문헌정보학전공)
  • Received : 2022.01.20
  • Accepted : 2022.02.03
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study suggests a theoretical model of information literacy instructions in the context of the Extended Essay included in IB(International Baccalaureate) Diploma Program Core. The study particularly analyzed I-LEARN model as a model to teach and learn with information for inquiry-based learning since the model was developed for the purpose of learning with information. Some school districts in Korea adapted IB programs to address the need for better education. Findings indicate the followings. First, students can achieve deep understanding by applying a model of information literacy instructions that provides scaffolding. Second, the expected roles of school librarians in information literacy instructions for Extended Essay are process specialists, teachers, and instructional partners. Third, I-LEARN model is appropriate as a framework to teach information literacy skills for inquiry needed for Extended Essay. Fourth, I-LEARN assessment rubric is useful in assessing the process and outcomes of students' information seeking and use. Implications include that school librarians should develop themselves as experts in information literacy instructions for inquiry-based learning such as Extended Essay, and that Korean schools recognize the crucial role of school librarians in teaching information literacy skills for inquiry-based learinng.

본 연구는 학습을 위한 정보활용교육이 공식 교육과정 맥락에서 안정적으로 이루어지기를 기대하며 공식적인 IB 디플로마 핵심 프로그램(DP Core)의 하나인 확장 에세이 맥락에서 체계적으로 진행할 수 있는 정보활용교육의 이론적 틀을 분석 및 제안하였다. 국제 인증 교육 프로그램인 IB 프로그램은 최근 국내 일부 교육청에서 도입하였으며 고등학생 연령군 대상의 IB 디플로마 프로그램 중에는 확장 에세이가 필수 이수 프로그램이다. 본 연구의 분석 결과, 다음의 사항이 제안되었다. 첫째, 학생들의 깊이 있는 학습과 교육적 비계를 위해 모형 적용이 강조되었다. 둘째, 사서교사는 학습 과정의 전문가, 정보활용교육을 실시하는 교사, 지도교사와 협력하는 교수협력자로서 역할을 충실히 담당해야 한다. 셋째, 정보활용교육의 틀로서 정보활용 기반의 학습을 제안한 I-LEARN 모형이 분석되었고 적절하다고 제안되었다. 넷째, I-LEARN 평가 루브릭은 확장 에세이의 평가 목표인 지식, 이해, 적용, 분석, 종합, 평가와 부합하도록 설계되어 있어 확장 에세이를 위한 정보활용의 과정과 성과를 위한 평가도구로 활용되기 적절하다고 분석되었다. 향후, 본 연구가 탐구학습을 기반으로 하는 확장에세이 또는 소논문 작성에 있어 사서교사의 전문성이 적용되고, 사서교사의 교육적 역할과 정보활용교육이 강화될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 2020년 덕성여자대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었음.

References

  1. Kim, S. J. (2009). A study of Korean teacher librarians' perception of expertise. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.3.200909.249
  2. So, B. M. & Song, G. H. (2017). An analysis on the educational contents of the research paper writing program through information problem solving model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(2), 449-467. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.48.2.201706.449
  3. So, B. M. & Song, G. H. (2018). An analysis of secondary school teachers' perceptions and experiences in Korean school libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.3.201809.55
  4. Song, K. H. (2019). An analysis of teacher librarians' role recognition. Journal of Korean Society of Library and Information Science Society, 53(4), 5-22.
  5. Lee, B. K. (2010). Study on the restructure of information literacy process based on taxonomy educational objectives. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.41.2.201006.107
  6. Lee, S. M., Lim, J. H., Kang, B. S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A study on analysis of importance-performanceon teacher librarians' competencies. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(3), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.52.3.202109.177
  7. Lim, J. H. & Lee J. W. (2018). A case study on the relationship between information literacy skills and critical thinking dispositions of high school students. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(1), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.1.277
  8. Chung, J. S. (2003). Learning with information in an information-rich environment. Journal of Information Management, 24(3), 135-158.
  9. Chung, J. S. (2009). Teacher-librarians perceptions on their roles. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 43(4), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.281
  10. Chung, J. S. (2014). A study on the levels of the instructional activities by Korean teacher-librarians. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(1), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2014.25.1.153
  11. AASL & AECT (1988). Information Power: Guidelines for School Library Media Programs. Chicago, IL: ALA.
  12. AASL & AECT (1998). Information Power: Building Partnership for School Library Media Programs. Chicago, IL: ALA.
  13. AASL (2009). Empowering Learners: Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago, IL: ALA.
  14. AASL (2018). National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago, IL: ALA.
  15. ALA. (2016). AASL Defines 'Effective School Library Programs' for ESSA Implementations. Retrieved January 4, 2022 from https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2016/07/aasl-defines-effective-school-library-program-essa-implementation
  16. Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. Ed. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Complete ed. New York: Longman.
  17. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.
  18. Donovan, L. E. (2020). Shared Foundations: Inquire. Chicago, IL: ALA.
  19. IBO (2016). Extended essay guide. IBO.
  20. IBO (2022a). About the Facts. Retrieved January 18, 2022 from https://ibo.org/about-the-ib/
  21. IBO (2022b). Key Facts About The DP. Retrieved January 4, 2022 from https://ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/what-is-the-dp/key-facts-about-the-dp/
  22. IBO (2022c). Curriculum. Retrieved January 4, 2022 from https://www.ibo.org/programmes/diploma-programme/curriculum/
  23. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1987). Information Skills for an Information Society: A Review of Research. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources.
  24. Loertcher, D. V. & Wools, B. (2002). Information Literacy: A Review of Research. San Jose, CA: Hi Willow.
  25. Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
  26. Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. In Meyer, J. H. F. & R. Land (eds). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge, 19-32.
  27. Neuman, D. (2011). Learning in Information-Rich Environment: I-LEARN and the Construction of Knowledge in the 21stcentury. New York, NY: Springer.
  28. Neuman, D. et al. (2019). Learning in Information-Rich Environment: I-LEARN and the Construction of Knowledge From Information. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
  29. Stripling, B. K. (1995 Spring). Learning-centered libraries: implications from research. School Library Media Quarterly, 23(3), 163-70.
  30. Todd, R. (1995 Winter). Integrated information skills instruction: does it make a difference? School Library Media Quarterly, 23(2), 133-139.