Advances in concrete construction

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.71-81
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2287-5301(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-531X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reactivity of aluminosilicate materials and synthesis of geopolymer mortar under ambient and hot curing condition

  • Zafar, Idrees (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University) ;
  • Tahir, Muhammad Akram (Faculty of Engineering, University of Central Punjab) ;
  • Hameed, Rizwan (Department of Architectural Engineering and Design, University of Engineering and Technology) ;
  • Rashid, Khuram (Department of Architectural Engineering and Design, University of Engineering and Technology) ;
  • Ju, Minkwan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.09
  • 심사 : 2021.12.28
  • 발행 : 2022.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Aluminosilicate materials as precursors are heterogenous in nature, consisting of inert and partially reactive portion, and have varying proportions depending upon source materials. It is essential to assess the reactivity of precursor prior to synthesize geopolymers. Moreover, reactivity may act as decisive factor for setting molar concentration of NaOH, curing temperature and setting proportion of different precursors. In this experimental work, the reactivities of two precursors, low calcium (fly ash (FA)) and high calcium (ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)), were assessed through the dissolution of aluminosilicate at (i) three molar concentrations (8, 12, and 16 M) of NaOH solution, (ii) 6 to 24 h dissolution time, and (iii) 20-100℃. Based on paratermeters influencing the reactivity, different proportions of ternary binders (two precursors and ordinary cement) were activated by the combined NaOH and Na2SiO3 solutions with two alkaline activators to precursor ratios, to synthesize the geopolymer. Reactivity results revealed that GGBS was 20-30% more reactive than FA at 20℃, at all three molar concentrations, but its reactivity decreased by 32-46% with increasing temperature due to the high calcium content. Setting time of geopolymer paste was reduced by adding GGBS due to its fast reactivity. Both GGBS and cement promoted the formation of all types of gels (i.e., C-S-H, C-A-S-H, and N-A-S-H). As a result, it was found that a specified mixing proportion could be used to improve the compressive strength over 30 MPa at both the ambient and hot curing conditions.

키워드

과제정보

This research was performed by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2020R1A2C1013043). Authors express thanks for the support.

참고문헌

  1. Abdulkareem, O.A., Ramli, M. and Matthews, J.C. (2019), "Production of geopolymer mortar system containing high calcium biomass wood ash as a partial substitution to fly ash: An early age evaluation", Compos. Part B Eng., 174, 106941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106941.
  2. Adu-Amankwah, S., Khatib, J.M., Searle, D.E. and Black, L. (2016), "Effect of synthesis parameters on the performance of alkali-activated non-conformant EN 450 pulverised fuel ash", Constr. Build. Mater., 121, 453-459. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.132.
  3. Al-Azzawi, M., Yu, T. and Hadi, M.N.S. (2018), "Factors affecting the bond strength between the fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and steel reinforcement", Struct., 14, 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.010.
  4. Al-Majidi, M.H., Lampropoulos, A., Cundy, A. and Meikle, S. (2016), "Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications", Constr. Build. Mater., 120, 198-211. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.085.
  5. ASTM C191 (2019), Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  6. ASTM C1437, (2020), Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  7. ASTM C109, (2020), Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  8. Bashar, I.I., Alengaram, U.J., Jumaat, M.Z. and Islam, A. (2014), "The effect of variation of molarity of alkali activator and fine aggregate content on the compressive strength of the fly ash: Palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar", Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/245473.
  9. BSI (2011), BS EN 197-1:2011, Cement Composition Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements, British Standards Institution (BSI), London, UK.
  10. Canakci, H., Gullu, H. and Alhashemy, A. (2019), "Performances of using geopolymers made with various stabilizers for deep mixing", Mater., 12(16), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162542.
  11. Cao, R., Zhang, S., Banthia, N., Zhang, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2020), "Interpreting the early-age reaction process of alkali-activated slag by using combined embedded ultrasonic measurement, thermal analysis, XRD, FTIR and SEM", Compos. Part B Eng., 186, 107840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107840.
  12. Cheah, C.B., Tan, L.E. and Ramli, M. (2019), "The engineering properties and microstructure of sodium carbonate activated fly ash/ slag blended mortars with silica fume", Compos. Part B Eng., 160, 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.056.
  13. Chuah, S., Duan, W.H., Pan, Z., Hunter, E., Korayem, A.H., Zhao, X.L., Collins, F. and Sanjayan, J.G. (2016), "The properties of fly ash based geopolymer mortars made with dune sand", Mater. Des., 92, 571-578. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.070.
  14. Elyamany, H.E., Abd Elmoaty, A.E.M. and Elshaboury, A.M. (2018), "Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders", Constr. Build. Mater., 187, 974-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.025.
  15. Esparham, A., Moradikhou, A.B., Andalib, F.K. and Avanaki, M.J. (2021), "Strength characteristics of granulated ground blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete", Adv. Concrete Constr., 11(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2021.11.3.219.
  16. Farhan, N.A., Sheikh, M.N. and Hadi, M.N.S. (2019), "Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete", Constr. Build. Mater., 196, 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083.
  17. Fernandez-Jimenez, A. and Palomo, A. (2005), "Mid-infrared spectroscopic studies of alkali-activated fly ash structure", Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 86(1-3), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.057.
  18. Garcia Lodeiro, I., Macphee, D.E., Palomo, A. and Fernandez-Jimenez, A. (2009), "Effect of alkalis on fresh C-S-H gels. FTIR analysis", Cement Concrete Res., 39(3), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.003.
  19. Ghafoor, M.T., Khan, Q.S., Qazi, A.U., Sheikh, M.N. and Hadi, M.N.S. (2021), "Influence of alkaline activators on the mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature", Constr. Build. Mater., 273, 121752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121752.
  20. Gholampour, A., Ho, V.D. and Ozbakkaloglu, T., (2019), "Ambient-cured geopolymer mortars prepared with waste-based sands: Mechanical and durability-related properties and microstructure", Compos. Part B Eng., 160, 519-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.057.
  21. Goriparthi, M.R. (2017), "Effect of fly ash and GGBS combination on mechanical and durability properties of GPC", Adv. Concrete Constr., 5(4), 313. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2017.5.4.313.
  22. Hadi, M.N.S., Farhan, N.A. and Sheikh, M.N. (2017), "Design of geopolymer concrete with GGBFS at ambient curing condition using Taguchi method", Constr. Build. Mater., 140, 424-431. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.131.
  23. Hadi, M.N.S., Zhang, H. and Parkinson, S. (2019), "Optimum mix design of geopolymer pastes and concretes cured in ambient condition based on compressive strength, setting time and workability", J. Build. Eng., 23, 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.006.
  24. Huseien, G.F., Mirza, J., Ismail, M. and Hussin, M.W. (2016), "Influence of different curing temperatures and alkali activators on properties of GBFS geopolymer mortars containing fly ash and palm-oil fuel ash", Constr. Build. Mater., 125, 1229-1240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.153.
  25. Jindal, B.B. (2018), "Feasibility study of ambient cured geopolymer concrete-A review", Adv. Concrete Constr., 6(4), 387. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.4.387.
  26. Jindal, B.B. (2019), "Investigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review", Constr. Build. Mater., 227, 116644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.025.
  27. Ke, X. and Duan, Y. (2021), "Coupling machine learning with thermodynamic modelling to develop a composition-property model for alkali-activated materials", Compos. Part B Eng., 216, 108801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108801.
  28. Kuenzel, C., Neville, T.P., Donatello, S., Vandeperre, L., Boccaccini, A.R. and Cheeseman, C.R. (2013), "Influence of metakaolin characteristics on the mechanical properties of geopolymers", Appl. Clay Sci., 83, 308-314. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.023.
  29. Kuenzel, C. and Ranjbar, N. (2019), "Dissolution mechanism of fly ash to quantify the reactive aluminosilicates in geopolymerisation", Res. Conse. Recycl., 150, 104421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104421.
  30. Kurtoglu, A.E., Alzeebaree, R., Aljumaili, O., Nis, A., Gulsan, M.E., Humur, G. and Cevik, A. (2018), "Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash and slag based geopolymer concrete", Adv. Concrete Constr., 6(4), 345. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.4.345.
  31. Leong, H.Y., Ong, D.E.L., Sanjayan, J.G. and Nazari, A. (2016), "The effect of different Na2O and K2O ratios of alkali activator on compressive strength of fly ash based-geopolymer", Constr. Build. Mater., 106, 500-511. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.141.
  32. Longhi, M.A., Walkley, B., Rodriguez, E.D., Kirchheim, A.P., Zhang, Z. and Wang, H. (2019), "New selective dissolution process to quantify reaction extent and product stability in metakaolin-based geopolymers", Compos. Part B Eng., 176, 107172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107172.
  33. Ma, C.K., Awang, A.Z. and Omar, W. (2018), "Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review", Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111.
  34. Mehta, A. and Siddique, R. (2017), "Strength, permeability and micro-structural characteristics of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymers", Constr. Build. Mater., 141, 325-334. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.031.
  35. Nath, P. and Sarker, P.K., (2014), "Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition", Constr. Build. Mater., 66, 163-171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080.
  36. Nath, P. and Sarker, P.K. (2015), "Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature", Cement Concrete Compos., 55, 205-214. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.08.008.
  37. Nawaz, M., Heitor, A. and Sivakumar, M. (2020), "Geopolymers in construction-Recent developments", Constr. Build. Mater., 260, 120472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120472.
  38. Noushini, A., Castel, A., Aldred, J. and Rawal, A., (2020), "Chloride diffusion resistance and chloride binding capacity of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete", Cement Concrete Compos., 105, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.006.
  39. Panda, B., Unluer, C. and Tan, M.J. (2018), "Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing", Cement Concrete Compos., 94, 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002.
  40. Phoo-ngernkham, T., Maegawa, A., Mishima, N., Hatanaka, S. and Chindaprasirt, P. (2015), "Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA-GBFS geopolymer", Constr. Build. Mater., 91, 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001.
  41. Rafeet, A., Vinai, R., Soutsos, M. and Sha, W. (2017), "Guidelines for mix proportioning of fly ash/GGBS based alkali activated concretes", Constr. Build. Mater., 147, 130-142. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.036.
  42. Ranjbar, N. and Kuenzel, C. (2017), "Influence of preheating of fly ash precursors to produce geopolymers", J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 100(7), 3165-3174. http://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14848.
  43. Samantasinghar, S. and Singh, S.P. (2019), "Fresh and hardened properties of fly ash-slag blended geopolymer paste and mortar", Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater., 13(47), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0360-1.
  44. Shaikh, F.U.A. (2018), "Effects of slag content on the residual mechanical properties of ambient air-cured geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures", J. Asian Ceram. Soc., 6(4), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2018.1529013.
  45. Singhal, D. (2017), "Development of mix design method for geopolymer concrete", Adv. Concrete Constr., 5(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2017.5.4.377.
  46. Temuujin, J., Williams, R.P. and van Riessen, A. (2009), "Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature", J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 209(12-13), 5276-5280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.016.
  47. ul Haq, E., Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan, S. and Licciulli, A. (2014), "Synthesis and characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash based geopolymers-A comparative study", Ceram. Int., 40(2), 2965- 2971. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.10.012.
  48. Ul Rehman, M., Rashid, K., Ul Haq, E., Hussain, M. and Shehzad, N. (2020), "Physico-mechanical performance and durability of artificial lightweight aggregates synthesized by cementing and geopolymerization", Constr. Build. Mater., 232, 117290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117290.
  49. Zhang, P., Gao, Z., Wang, J., Guo, J., Hu, S. and Ling, Y. (2020), "Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: A review", J. Clean. Prod., 270, 122389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122389.
  50. Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Wang, K. and Zhang, J. (2018), "A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar", Compos. Part B Eng., 152, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.031.