Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제81권3호
  • /
  • Pages.293-303
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Neural network based numerical model updating and verification for a short span concrete culvert bridge by incorporating Monte Carlo simulations

  • Lin, S.T.K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University) ;
  • Lu, Y. (Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University) ;
  • Alamdari, M.M. (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales) ;
  • Khoa, N.L.D. (Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO))
  • 투고 : 2020.07.07
  • 심사 : 2021.11.16
  • 발행 : 2022.02.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As infrastructure ages and traffic load increases, serious public concerns have arisen for the well-being of bridges. The current health monitoring practice focuses on large-scale bridges rather than short span bridges. However, it is critical that more attention should be given to these behind-the-scene bridges. The relevant information about the construction methods and as-built properties are most likely missing. Additionally, since the condition of a bridge has unavoidably changed during service, due to weathering and deterioration, the material properties and boundary conditions would also have changed since its construction. Therefore, it is not appropriate to continue using the design values of the bridge parameters when undertaking any analysis to evaluate bridge performance. It is imperative to update the model, using finite element (FE) analysis to reflect the current structural condition. In this study, a FE model is established to simulate a concrete culvert bridge in New South Wales, Australia. That model, however, contains a number of parameter uncertainties that would compromise the accuracy of analytical results. The model is therefore updated with a neural network (NN) optimisation algorithm incorporating Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to minimise the uncertainties in parameters. The modal frequency and strain responses produced by the updated FE model are compared with the frequency and strain values on-site measured by sensors. The outcome indicates that the NN model updating incorporating MC simulation is a feasible and robust optimisation method for updating numerical models so as to minimise the difference between numerical models and their real-world counterparts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbasnia, R., Shayanfar, M. and Khodam, A. (2014), "Reliability-based design optimization of structural systems using a hybrid genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(6), 1099-1120. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1099.
  2. Alencar, G., de Jesus, A.M., Calcada, R.A. and da Silva, J.G.S. (2018), "Fatigue life evaluation of a composite steel-concrete roadway bridge through the hot-spot stress method considering progressive pavement deterioration", Eng. Struct., 166, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.058.
  3. Alqedra, M., Arafa, M. and Ismail, M. (2011), "Optimum cost of prestressed and reinforced concrete beams using genetic algorithms", J. Artif. Intel., 4(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.3923/jai.2011.76.88
  4. Alwosheel, A., van Cranenburgh, S. and Chorus, C.G. (2018), "Is your dataset big enough? sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis", J. Choice Model., 28, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.002.
  5. Ataei, S., Tajalli, M. and Miri, A. (2016), "Assessment of load carrying capacity and fatigue life expectancy of a monumental masonry arch bridge by field load testing: A case study of Veresk", Struct. Eng. Mech., 59(4), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.4.703.
  6. Aygul, M., Al-Emrani, M. and Urushadze, S. (2012), "Modelling and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic bridge deck details using FEM", Int. J. Fatig., 40, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.015.
  7. Basterrech, S., Mohammed, S., Rubino, G. and Soliman, M. (2011), "Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithms for random neural networks", Comput. J., 54(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxp101.
  8. Brandimarte, P. (2014), Handbook in Monte Carlo Simulation: Applications in Financial Engineering, Risk Management, and Economics, John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Cha, Y.J., Choi, W. and Buyukozturk, O. (2017), "Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 32(5), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12263.
  10. Chan, T.H., Zhou, T., Li, Z. and Guo, L. (2005), "Hot spot stress approach for Tsing Ma Bridge fatigue evaluation under traffic using finite element method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 19(3), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.19.3.261.
  11. Chan, W.K.V. (2013), Theory and Applications of Monte Carlo Simulations, BoD-Books on Demand. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25349-2_111.
  12. Chen, Y., Yan, J., Feng, J. and Sareh, P. (2021), "Particle swarm optimization-based metaheuristic design generation of nontrivial flat-foldable origami tessellations with degree-4 vertices", J. Mech. Des., 143(1), 011703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047437.
  13. Deng, L. and Cai, C. (2010), "Bridge model updating using response surface method and genetic algorithm", J. Bridge Eng., 15(5), 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000092.
  14. Fan, W., Chen, Y., Li, J., Sun, Y., Feng, J., Hassanin, H. and Sareh, P. (2021), "Machine learning applied to the design and inspection of reinforced concrete bridges: Resilient methods and emerging applications", Struct., 33, 3954-3963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.110.
  15. Fryba, L. (1995), "History of Winkler foundation", Vehic. Syst. Dyn., 24(Sup1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119508969611.
  16. Gomes, H.M. (2011), "Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm", Exp. Syst. Appl., 38(1), 957-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.086.
  17. Harrison, R.L. (2010), "Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation", AIP Conf. Proc., 1204(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3295638.
  18. HasancEbi, O. and Dumlupinar, T. (2013), "Linear and nonlinear model updating of reinforced concrete T-beam bridges using artificial neural networks", Comput. Struct., 119, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.017.
  19. Hester, D., Koo, K., Xu, Y., Brownjohn, J. and Bocian, M. (2019), "Boundary condition focused finite element model updating for bridges", Eng. Struct., 198, 109514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109514.
  20. Isojeh, B., El-Zeghayar, M. and Vecchio, F.J. (2019), "Numerical analysis of reinforced concrete and steel-fiber concrete elements under fatigue loading", J. Struct. Eng., 145(11), 04019126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002349.
  21. Jung, D.S. and Kim, C.Y. (2013), "Finite element model updating of a simply supported skewed PSC I-girder bridge using hybrid genetic algorithm", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 17(3), 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0599-z.
  22. Kalita, K., Nasre, P., Dey, P. and Haldar, S. (2018), "Metamodel based multi-objective design optimization of laminated composite plates", Struct. Eng. Mech., 67(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.3.301.
  23. Kaveh, A. and Bakhshpoori, T. (2019), Metaheuristics: Outlines, MATLAB Codes and Examples, Springer.
  24. Kwak, Y.H. and Ingall, L. (2007), "Exploring Monte Carlo simulation applications for project management", Risk Manage., 9(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250017.
  25. Levin, R.I. and Lieven, N. (1998), "Dynamic finite element model updating using neural networks", J. Sound Vib., 210(5), 593-607. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1364.
  26. Li, Y., Feng, X.Q., Cao, Y.P. and Gao, H. (2010), "A Monte Carlo form-finding method for large scale regular and irregular tensegrity structures", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 47(14-15), 1888-1898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.026.
  27. Lin, S.T., Lu, Y., Alamdari, M.M. and Khoa, N.L. (2020), "Field test investigations for condition monitoring of a concrete culvert bridge using vibration responses", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 27(10), e2614. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2614.
  28. Lu, Y. and Tu, Z. (2004), "A two-level neural network approach for dynamic FE model updating including damping", J. Sound Vib., 275(3-5), 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00796-X.
  29. Maind, S.B. and Wankar, P. (2014), "Research paper on basic of artificial neural network", Int. J. Recent Innov. Trend. Comput. Commun., 2(1), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v2i1.2920.
  30. Miao, S., Koenders, E. and Knobbe, A. (2015), "Automatic baseline correction of strain gauge signals", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 22(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1658.
  31. Momeni, E., Nazir, R., Armaghani, D.J. and Maizir, H. (2014), "Prediction of pile bearing capacity using a hybrid genetic algorithm-based ANN", Measure., 57, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.007.
  32. Mordechai, S. (2011), Applications of Monte Carlo Method in Science and Engineering, Intech.
  33. Mortazavi, A., Togan, V. and Nuhoglu, A. (2017), "An integrated particle swarm optimizer for optimization of truss structures with discrete variables", Struct. Eng. Mech., 61(3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.359
  34. Nikoo, M., Torabian Moghadam, F. and Sadowski, L. (2015), "Prediction of concrete compressive strength by evolutionary artificial neural networks", Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, Article ID 849126, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/849126.
  35. Okasha, N.M. and Frangopol, D.M. (2010), "Advanced modeling for efficient computation of life-cycle performance prediction and service-life estimation of bridges", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 24(6), 548-556. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000060.
  36. Park, Y.S., Kim, S., Kim, N. and Lee, J.J. (2017), "Finite element model updating considering boundary conditions using neural networks", Eng. Struct., 150, 511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.032.
  37. Satoh, K., Yoshikawa, N., Nakano, Y. and Yang, W.J. (2001), "Whole learning algorithm of the neural network for modeling nonlinear and dynamic behavior of RC members", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(5), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.5.527.
  38. Shabbir, F. and Omenzetter, P. (2015), "Particle swarm optimization with sequential niche technique for dynamic finite element model updating", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 30(5), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12100.
  39. Shafahi, Y. and Bagherian, M. (2013), "A customized particle swarm method to solve highway alignment optimization problem", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 28(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00769.x.
  40. Shi, L., Lin, S., Lu, Y., Ye, L. and Zhang, Y. (2018), "Artificial neural network based mechanical and electrical property prediction of engineered cementitious composites", Constr. Build. Mater., 174, 667-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.127.
  41. Su, Z. and Ye, L. (2005), "Lamb wave propagation-based damage identification for quasi-isotropic CF/EP composite laminates using artificial neural algorithm: Part I-methodology and database development", J. Intel. Mater. Syst. Struct., 16(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045389X05047599. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045389X05047599
  42. Wang, S.C. (2012), Interdisciplinary Computing in Java Programming, Vol. 743, Springer Science & Business Media.
  43. Yan, G.R., Duan, Z.D. and Ou, J.P. (2007), "Application of genetic algorithm on structural finite element model updating", J. Harbin Inst. Technol., 2, 181-186.
  44. Zivanovic, S., Pavic, A. and Reynolds, P. (2007), "Finite element modelling and updating of a lively footbridge: The complete process", J. Sound Vib., 301(1-2), 126-145. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1099.