한방재활의학과학회지 (Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation)

  • 제32권1호
  • /
  • Pages.63-72
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-1854(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4114(eISSN)
한방재활의학과학회 (The society of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한방병원에 내원한 척추측만증 환자의 특성에 대한 후향적 연구

Retrospective Study on the Characteristics of Patients with Scoliosis at the Korean Medicine Hospital

  • 강신우 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 한방재활의학과) ;
  • 박현선 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 한방재활의학과) ;
  • 박서현 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 한방재활의학과) ;
  • 성원석 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 침구과) ;
  • 김은정 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 침구과) ;
  • 금동호 (동국대학교 분당한방병원 한방재활의학과)
  • Kang, Shinwoo (Department of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hyunsun (Department of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital) ;
  • Park, Seohyun (Department of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital) ;
  • Sung, Wonsuk (Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Eunjung (Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital) ;
  • Keum, Dongho (Department of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation, Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.15
  • 심사 : 2021.12.31
  • 발행 : 2022.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives This study was conducted to characterize scoliosis patients visiting Korean medicine hospital and to analyze the demands and factors affecting discomfort. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 33 scoliosis patients who visited Korean medicine hospital from March, 2021 to October, 2021. The data analysis consisted of three factors: (1) demographic characteristics, (2) characteristics of demands on Korean medicine (reasons for choosing Korean medical treatment, preferred treatment methods, most uncomfortable part, treatment priorities) and (3) discomfort factors (treatment experiences, diagnosed age and Cobb's angle). Statistical analyses were performed and a p-value≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results 43.75% of the patients chose 'effectiveness' for the reason why they preferred Korean medicine treatment. 'Chuna treatment' was the most preferred treatment method. The patients chose 'lower back' for the most uncomfortable part and 'pain' for the highest priority of improvement. The Cobb's angle of included patients was 16.02±7.65° and it is not much differ to average of Cobb's angle in Korean. Discomfort was more severe in the patients with treatment-experienced than treatment-naive. The score of discomfort in appearance and psychological were higher in the patients diagnosed in childhood or adolescent period than who were diagnosed after adult. Classification based on Cobb's angle showed no statistical difference. Conclusions Not only Cobb's angle but also other clinical factors should be considered for effective treatment in scoliosis. Also, It is necessary to pay attention to adult scoliosis patients.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 보건복지부의 재원으로 '한국보건산업진흥원의 보건의료기술연구개발사업(HF20C0210)'의 지원을 받아 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Orthopaedics. 6th ed. Seoul:Newmed. 2006:436-49, 589-606.
  2. Theroux J, Stomski N, Hodgetts CJ, Ballard A, Khadra C, Le May S, Labelle H. Prevalence of low back pain in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Chiropratic & Manual Therapies. 2017;25:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-017-0143-1
  3. Iwahara T, Imari M, Arsuta Y. Quantification of cosmesis for patients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal. 1998;7:12-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050020
  4. Kane WJ. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1997;126:43-6.
  5. Reamy BV, Slakey JB. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts. American Family Physician. 2001;64(1):111-6.
  6. Chang DG, Kim GU, Suk SI, Lim DJ, Oh IT, Nam KY, Kim JH, Kim YH, Ha KY. Prevalence of thoracic scoliosis in Koreans using simple chest radiography. Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery. 2019;26(2):56-62. https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2019.26.2.56
  7. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O'Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders. 2018;13(3):1-48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0148-5
  8. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D, Steiner A, Warschburger P, Weiss HR. Quality of life in woman with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27:87-91.
  9. Payne WK, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD, Kane RL, Transfeldt EE, Blum RW. Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine. 1997;22:1380-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199706150-00017
  10. Kim EJ, Kim HS, Heo HS, Moon JH. Relation of radiographic parameters and psychosocial condition in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Journal of Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2004;28(3):259-64.
  11. Kim BR, Ham JH. Awareness and treatment status of scoliosis of middle and high school students in Seosan city. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2011;11(11):204-12. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.11.204
  12. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Scoliosis medical expense stastistics [Internet] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 30]. Available from: URL: http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olap3thDsInfo.do.
  13. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28(1):63-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015
  14. Thielsch MT, Wetterkamp M, Boertz P, Gosheger G, Schulte TL. Reliability and validity of the spinal appearance questionnaire (SAQ) and the trunk appearance perception scale (TAPS). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018;13(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0693-x
  15. Lee SW, Chu HY, Kim H, Lee SG, Choi JY, Lee YJ, Choi KE. A review of the domestic trends of Korean traditional medicine for idiopathic. J Korean Med Rehabil. 2020;30(4):55-64. https://doi.org/10.18325/jkmr.2020.30.4.55
  16. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Instr Course Lect. 1948;5:261-75.
  17. Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. European Spine Journal. 2005;14(10):925-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9
  18. Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerve. Chuna manual medicine. 2.5 ed. Seoul:Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerve. 2017:4-5.
  19. Teles AR, Ocay DD, Bin Shebreen A, Tice A, Saran N, Ouellet JA, Ferland CE. Evidence of impaired pain modulation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and chronic back pain. The Spine Journal. 2019;19(4):677-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.009
  20. Edwards RR, Ness TJ, Weigent DA, Fillingim RB. Individual differences in diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC): association with clinical variables. Pain. 2003;106(3):427-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.005