DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 기법을 활용한 상악 전치부의 진단 및 수복 증례

Digital technique in diagnosis and restoration of maxillary anterior implant: a case report

  • 방혜민 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 장우형 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 윤귀덕 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 임현필 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실) ;
  • 박상원 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보철학교실)
  • Haemin, Bang (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Woohyung, Jang (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Chan, Park (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kwi-Dug, Yun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hyun-Pil, Lim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Sangwon, Park (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.21
  • 심사 : 2022.12.01
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31

초록

성공적인 상악전치부의 임플란트 식립은 많은 고려를 필요로 한다. 환자를 만족시키며 기능적이며 심미적인 보철수복을 위해서는, 치료에 앞서 정확한 진단이 선행되어야 하며 이는 구내스캔, 콘빔시티, 그리고 안면스캔을 중첩함으로 시도해 볼 수 있다. 구내스캔을 통해 얻어지는 환자의 교합양상과 콘빔시티에서 얻어지는 환자의 치조골의 양상 및 질, 그리고 안면스캔에서 얻어지는 환자의 특성과 구외평가를 어우르는 진단은 보다 성공적인 보철수복을 위한 발판이 될 수 있다. 다양한 정보의 중첩을 통해, 보철적으로 이상적인 치관의 위치를 우선순위에 두지만, 환자의 생물학적 한계를 포용하는 "탑다운"형식의 임플란트 진단은, 이를 고려한 서지컬 가이드를 3D 프린팅하고, 수술에 사용함으로써 구현되었다. 환자의 치조골 소실로 인한 임플란트 식립위치의 한계점은, 치아의 선각과 착시효과를 이용한 보철수복을 통하여 극복하려고 노력하였다. 이후, 임시수복물을 사용하고 환자가 가장 편하다고 느끼는 보철물을 장착한 뒤 디지털 교합장비(Arcus Digma II)를 이용하여 전방유도와 하악의 운동을 측정하여 이를 최종보철물에 적용하였다.

The implant prosthesis of anterior maxilla requires careful consideration in planning. In order to satisfy both esthetic and functional needs of a patient, fusion of intra-oral scan in Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and facial scan can be considered. Bony structures and soft tissues captured in CBCT and occlusal surfaces of intra oral scan were incorporated into personal characteristics from facial scan. The patient had insufficient buccal bone on maxillary anterior area. The maxillary implants could not be placed on the most ideal position. However, the "top down" approach completed by computer-generated arranging of teeth in implant planning and surgery with surgical guide resulted in esthetically and functionally satisfying result regardless of the limitation. Careful diagnosis with digital technique and the usage of surgical guide resulted in successful surgery and esthetic restoration. The temporary fixed prostheses were designed, restored and evaluated. The patient was not satisfied with the first design of temporary prosthesis, which showed uneven space distribution between teeth due to the position of maxillary implant. The design was modified by changing proximal emergence contours and line angle to alter the perceived since of incisors. The patient was satisfied with the new design of provisional restoration. A digital occlusion analyzer (Arcus Digma II, KaVo, Leutkirch, Germany) was used to measure inherent condylar guidance and anterior guidance of a patient to provide a definitive prosthesis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:244-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90028-8
  2. Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26 Suppl 11:69-76.
  3. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:92-109.
  4. Sesemann MR. Understanding and providing - Appropriate line angles to optimize smile design resto-rations. J Cosmet Dent 2017;33:66-75.
  5. Chiche G, Pinault A. Esthetics of anterior fixed prosthodontics. 1st ed. Hanover Park; Quitessence Pub.; 1994. p. 25-31.
  6. Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conser Dent 2010;13:225-32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73387
  7. Stiesch-Scholz M, Demling A, Rossbach A. Reproducibility of jaw movements in patients with craniomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:807-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01636.x
  8. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Evolution of occlusion and occlusal instruments. J Prosthodont 1993;2:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00379.x
  9. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137 Suppl 4:S109-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.013
  10. Li J, Chen Z, Decker AM, Wang HL, Joda T, Mendonca G, Lepidi L. Trueness and Precision of Economical Smartphone-Based Virtual Facebow Records. J Prosthodont 2022;31:22-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13366