Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Iterative-R: A reliability-based calibration framework of response modification factor for steel frames

  • Received : 2020.11.07
  • Accepted : 2021.11.10
  • Published : 2022.01.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study introduces a general reliability-based, performance-based design framework to design frames regarding their uncertainties and user-defined design goals. The Iterative-R method extracted from the main framework can designate a proper R (i.e., response modification factor) satisfying the design goal regarding target reliability index and pre-defined probability of collapse. The proposed methodology is based on FEMA P-695 and can be used for all systems that FEMA P-695 applies. To exemplify the method, multiple three-dimensional, four-story steel special moment-resisting frames are considered. Closed-form relationships are fitted between frames' responses and the modeling parameters. Those fits are used to construct limit state functions to apply reliability analysis methods for design safety assessment and the selection of proper R. The frameworks' unique feature is to consider arbitrarily defined probability density functions of frames' modeling parameters with an insignificant analysis burden. This characteristic enables the alteration in those parameters' distributions to meet the design goal. Furthermore, with sensitivity analysis, the most impactful parameters are identifiable for possible improvements to meet the design goal. In the studied examples, it is revealed that a proper R for frames with different levels of uncertainties could be significantly different from suggested values in design codes, alarming the importance of considering the stochastic behavior of elements' nonlinear behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSI/AISC 341-16 (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.
  2. ANSI/AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.
  3. ASCE/SEI 41-17 (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  4. ASCE7-16 (2016), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  5. ASTM A36/A36M-14 (2014), Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel, American Society for Testing and Materials.
  6. Burton H. (2018), "A framework for performance-based analytics driven design", In Proceedings of the 11th national conference in earthquake engineering, Los Angeles, CA, June.
  7. Esteghamati, M.Z. and Farzampour, A. (2020), "Probabilistic seismic performance and loss evaluation of a multi-story steel building equipped with butterfly-shaped fuses", J. Construct. Steel Res., 172, 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106187.
  8. Esteghamati, M.Z., Lee, J., Musetich, M. and Flint, M.M. (2020), "INSSEPT: An open-source relational database of seismic performance estimation to aid with early design of buildings", Earthq. Spectra. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919857.
  9. Excel spreadsheet and MATLAB implementations of the SPO2IDA algorithm for practically all-period oscillators (2018), http://users.ntua.gr/divamva/software.html.
  10. FEMA P-58-1 (2018), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings. Volume 1- Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  11. FEMA P-695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  12. Fiorino, L., Shakeel, S., Macillo, V. and Landolfo, R. (2017), "Behaviour factor (q) evaluation the CFS braced structures according to FEMA P-695", J. Construct. Steel Res., 138, 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.014.
  13. Gokkaya, B.U., Baker, J.W. and Deierlein, G.G. (2016), "Quantifying the impacts of modeling uncertainties on the seismic drift demands and collapse risk of buildings with implications on seismic design checks", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 45(10), 1661-1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2740.
  14. Gokkaya, B.U., Baker, J.W. and Deierlein, G.G. (2017), "Estimation and impacts of model parameter correlation for seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete structures", Struct. Safety, 69, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.07.005.
  15. Guan M. Eeri, X., Burton M. Eeri, H. and Shokrabadi, M. (2021), "A database of seismic designs, nonlinear models, and seismic responses for steel moment-resisting frame buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 37(2), 1199-1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020971209.
  16. Hajirasouliha, I., Pilakoutas, K. and Mohammadi, R.K. (2016), "Effects of uncertainties on seismic behaviour of optimum designed braced steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(2), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.317.
  17. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489-1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.
  18. Ibarra, L. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Variance of collapse capacity of SDOF systems under earthquake excitations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(12), 1299-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1089.
  19. Jiang, L., Hong, Z. and Hu, Y. (2018), "Effects of various uncertainties on seismic risk of steel frame equipped with steel panel wall", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 16(12), 5995-6012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0423-8.
  20. Kazantzi, A.K., Righiniotis, T.D. and Chryssanthopoulos, M. K. (2008), "The effect of joint ductility on the seismic fragility of a regular moment resisting steel frame designed to EC8 provisions", J. Construct. Steel Res., 64(9), 987-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.005.
  21. Kazantzi, A.K., Vamvatsikos, D. and Lignos, D.G. (2014), "Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty", Eng. Struct., 78, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.044.
  22. Kim, K.D. and Engelhardt, M.D. (2002), "Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames", J. Construct. Steel Res., 58(5-8), 605-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00079-7.
  23. Korol, R.M., Ghobarah, A. and Mourad, S. (1993), "Blind bolting W-shape beams to HSS columns", J. Struct. Eng., 119(12), 3463-3481. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3463).
  24. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000376.
  25. Lignos, D.G., Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2008), "Reliability of a 4-story steel moment-resisting frame against collapse due to seismic excitations", Struct. Congress 2008: Crossing Borders, Vancouver, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/41016(314)243.
  26. Nunez, E., Torres, R. and Herrera, R. (2017), "Seismic performance of moment connections in steel moment frames with HSS columns", Steel Compos. Struct, 25(3), 271-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.3.271.
  27. Ozkilic, Y.O., Bozkurt, M.B. and Topkaya, C. (2018), "Evaluation of seismic response factors for BRBFs using FEMA P-695 methodology", J. Construct. Steel Res., 151, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.09.015.
  28. Qi, Y., Li, W. and Feng, N. (2017), "Seismic collapse probability of eccentrically braced steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 24(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.1.037.
  29. Rofooei, Fayaz R. and Ali S. (2020), "Evaluation of the seismic performance factors for steel diagrid structural systems using FEMA P-695 and ATC-19 procedures", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18, 4873-4910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00876-2.
  30. Sepasdar, R., Banan, M.R. and Banan, M.R. (2019), "A numerical investigation on the effect of panel zones on cyclic lateral capacity of steel moment frames", Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Transact. Civil Eng., 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00274-y.
  31. Shao, B. and Stephen A.M. (2020), "A probabilistic design method to achieve targeted levels of reliability for seismically isolated structures", Earthq. Spectra, 36(2), 741-766. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019891728.
  32. Taiyari, F., Mazzolani, F.M. and Bagheri, S. (2019), "Seismic performance assessment of steel building frames equipped with a novel type of bending dissipative braces", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.4.525.
  33. USGS Web Services (2019), https://earthquake.usgs.gov/ws.
  34. Veismoradi, S., Amiri, G.G. and Darvishan, E. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic assessment of buckling restrained braces and yielding brace systems", Int. J. Steel Struct., 16(3), 831-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-0073-5.
  35. Vigh, L.G., Deierlein, G.G., Miranda, E., Liel, A.B. and Tipping, S. (2013), "Seismic performance assessment of steel corrugated shear wall system using nonlinear analysis", J. Construct. Steel Res., 85, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.008.
  36. Vimvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2005), "Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of MDOF systems through incremental dynamic analysis of an SDOF approximation", J. Struct. Eng, 131(4), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339445(2005)131:4(589).
  37. Wen, Y.K., Ellingwood, B.R., Veneziano, D. and Bracci, J. (2003), Uncertainty Modeling in Earthquake Engineering, MAE Center Project FD-2 Report.
  38. Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. (2007), "Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(13), 1901-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702.
  39. Zareian, F., Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2010), "Evaluation of seismic collapse performance of steel special moment resisting frames using FEMA P-695 (ATC-63) methodology", Struct. Congress, 1275-1286.