DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of a two bearing lines deck on the bridge substructure

  • Shaker, Fatemeh (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Rahai, Alireza (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • Received : 2019.12.30
  • Accepted : 2021.10.21
  • Published : 2022.01.25

Abstract

This research evaluated the different types of deck to pier connections effects (one or two elastomeric bearing lines and rigid) on a concrete bridges. Three-dimensional bridge models behavior with different deck to pier connections and different distances of two bearing lines were studied under the service load. Also, the detailed connection system with two elastomeric bearing lines was modeled to evaluate the effect of changing distance between two-lines. Results indicated that the proper location of elastomeric bearings has a major impact on the transferring forces to the substructure. Double elastomeric bearing lines have a behavior between one line and rigid connections. Transferring bending moment to the substructure in two-lines is more than the corresponding value of the one line. Moreover, an increase in the distance of two-lines lead to a significant increase in the rotational stiffness of the connection, and an analytical solution was investigated for their relation. In fact, the semi-rigidity effect of this connection and its change due to the distance of bearings should be considered in the design process.

Keywords

References

  1. Algohi, B., Bakht, B. and Mufti, A. (2017), "Long-term study on bearing restraint of a girder bridge", J. Civil Struct. Hlth. Monit., 7(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0207-x.
  2. Ali, H.E.M. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1995), "Modeling of rubber and lead passive-control bearings for seismic analysis", J. Struct. Eng., 121(7), 1134-1144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1134).
  3. Attarchiana, N., Kalantari, A. and Moghadam, A.S. (2016), "Seismic performance of single pier skewed bridges with different pier-deck connections", Earthq. Struct., 10(6), 1467-1486. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1467.
  4. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovic, B. (2008), "Guidelines for nonlinear analysis of bridge structures in California", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley.
  5. Barker, R.M., Duncan, J.M., Rojiani, K.B., Ooi, P.S.K., Tan, C.K. and Kim, S.G. (1991), "Manuals for design of bridge foundations", NCHRP Report No. 343, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  6. Baumgart, F. (2000), "Stiffness-an unknown world of mechanical science?", Injury-Int. J. Care Injur., 31(2), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80040-6.
  7. BS EN (BSI British Standards) (2005), BS EN 1337-3, Structural Bearings-Part 3, Elastomeric Bearings, British Standard, BSI, Brussels, Belgium.
  8. Caltrans SDC (2004), Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.3, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento.
  9. Chalhoub, M.S. and Kelly, J.M. (1990), "Effect of bulk compressibility on the stiffness of cylindrical base isolation bearings", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 26(7), 743-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(90)90004-F.
  10. Chang, C.H. (2002), "Modeling of laminated rubber bearings using an analytical stiffness matrix", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 39(24), 6055-6078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00471-7.
  11. Constantinou, M.C., Kartoum, A. and Kelly, J.M. (1992), "Analysis of compression of hollow circular elastomeric bearings", Eng. Struct., 14(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(92)90036-P.
  12. Constantinou, M.C., Whittaker, A.S., Kalpakidis, Y., Fenz, D.M. and Warn, G.P. (2007), "Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading", Technical Report MCEER-07-0012,472, State University of New York, Buffalo.
  13. Conversy, F. (1967), "Appareils d'appui en caoutchouc frette", Ann. Ponts Chaussees, 6.
  14. Crowder, A.P. and Becker, T.C. (2017), "Experimental investigation of elastomeric isolation bearings with flexible supporting columns", J. Struct. Eng., 143(7), 04017057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001784.
  15. CSI Analysis Reference Manual (2016), CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000®, ETABS®, SAFE® and CSiBridge®; Berkely, California, USA.
  16. Doudoumis, I.N., Gravalas, F. and Doudoumis, N.I. (2005), "Analytical modeling of elastomeric lead-rubber bearings with the use of finite element micromodels", Proceedings of the 5th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics, Limassol, June-July.
  17. Esadzadeh, F.N., Maleki, S. and Barghian, M. (2015), "Design of integral abutment bridges for combined thermal and seismic loads". Earthq. Struct., 9(2), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.415.
  18. Gent, A.N. and Lindley, P.B. (1959), "The compression of bonded rubber blocks", Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 173(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1959_173_022_02.
  19. Gent, A.N. and Meinecke, E.A. (1970), "Compression, bending, and shear of bonded rubber blocks", Polym. Eng. Sci., 10(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760100110.
  20. GUMBA (2011), Bridge Bearings, Borken, Germany.
  21. He, X.H., Sheng, X.W., Scanlon, A., Linzell, D.G. and Yu, X.D. (2012), "Skewed concrete box girder bridge static and dynamic testing and analysis", Eng. Struct., 39, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.016.
  22. Imbimbo, M. and De Luca, A. (1998), "FE stress analysis of rubber bearings under axial loads", Comput. Struct., 68(1-3), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00038-8.
  23. Kalfas, K.N., Stergios, A.M. and Konstantinos, K. (2017), "Numerical study on the response of steel-laminated elastomeric bearings subjected to variable axial loads and development of local tensile stresses", Eng. Struct., 134, 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.015.
  24. Kartal, M.E., Basaga, H.B., Bayraktar, A. and Muvafik, M. (2010), "Effects of semi-rigid connection on structural responses", Electron. J. Struct. Eng., 10(10), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.10122
  25. Kelly, J.M. (1993), Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber, Springer-Verlag, London.
  26. Kelly, J.M. (1997), "Seismic isolation for earthquake-resistant design", Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber, Springer, London.
  27. Kumar, M. (2012), "Analysis of elastomeric bearings in compression, CIE 526: Finite element structural analysis", Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, USA.
  28. Mathivat, J. and Emberson, C.J.M. (1984), The Cantilever Construction of Prestressed Concrete Bridges, Wiley, Chichester.
  29. Moghe, S.R. and Neff, H.F. (1971), "Elastic deformations of constrained cylinders", J. Appl. Mech., 38(2), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3408788.
  30. Nassani, D.E. and Chikho, A.H. (2015), "A simple formula for estimating the column ultimate load with effect of semi-rigid connections" Int. J. Steel Struct., 15(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1104-3.
  31. Nittmannova, L. and Magura, M. (2016), "Experimental verification of elastomeric bearings according to STN EN 1337-3", Procedia Eng., 156, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.298.
  32. Pinarbasi, S. and Akyuz, U. (2004), "Investigation of compressive stiffness of elastomeric bearings", 6th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, October.
  33. Simo, J.C. and Kelly, J.M. (1984), "Finite element analysis of the stability of multilayer elastomeric bearings", Eng. Struct., 6(3), 162-174. http://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(84)90044-0.
  34. Simulia, D.S. (2013), ABAQUS 6.13 User's Manual, Dassault Systems, Providence, RI.
  35. Standard No.139 (2005), Iranian Standard Loads for Bridges, 3rd Edition, Tehran, Iran.
  36. Stanton, J.F. and Roeder, C.W. (1982), "Elastomeric bearings design, construction, and materials", NCHRCP Report 248, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
  37. Thai, H.T., Uy, B., Kang, W.H. and Hicks, S. (2016), "System reliability evaluation of steel frames with semi-rigid connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 121, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.009.
  38. Toopchi-Nezhad, H. (2014), "Horizontal stiffness solutions for unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric bearings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 49(3), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.3.395.
  39. Wu, Y.F., Wang, H., Sha, B., Zhang, R.J. and Li, A.Q. (2018), "The compression-shear properties of small-size seismic isolation rubber bearings for bridges", Struct. Monit. Mainten., 5(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2018.5.1.039.
  40. Zahrai, S.M., Khorraminejad, A. and Sedaghati, P. (2019), "Response modification factors of concrete bridges with different bearing conditions", Earthq. Struct., 16(2), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.2.185.