Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제81권1호
  • /
  • Pages.11-28
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental and numerical analyses on axial cyclic behavior of H-section aluminium alloy members

  • Wu, Jinzhi (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Zheng, Jianhua (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Sun, Guojun (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology) ;
  • Chang, Xinquan (Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.27
  • 심사 : 2021.10.09
  • 발행 : 2022.01.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper considers the combination of cyclic and axial loads to investigate the hysteretic performance of H-section 6061-T6 aluminum alloy members. The hysteretic performance of aluminum alloy members is the basis for the seismic performance of aluminum alloy structures. Despite the prevalence of aluminum alloy reticulated shells structures worldwide, research into the seismic performance of aluminum alloy structures remains inadequate. To address this deficiency, we design and conduct cyclic axial load testing of three H-section members based on a reliable testing system. The influence of slenderness ratios and bending direction on the failure form, bearing capacity, and stiffness degradation of each member are analyzed. The experiment results show that overall buckling dominates the failure mechanism of all test members before local buckling occurs. As the load increases after overall buckling, the plasticity of the member develops, finally leading to local buckling and fracture failure. The results illustrate that the plasticity development of the local buckling position is the main reason for the stiffness degradation and failure of the member. Additionally, with the increase of the slenderness ratio, the energy-dissipation capacity and stiffness of the member decrease significantly. Simultaneously, a finite element model based on the Chaboche hybrid strengthening model is established according to the experiment, and the rationality of the constitutive model and validity of the finite element simulation method are verified. The parameter analysis of twenty-four members with different sections, slenderness ratios, bending directions, and boundary conditions are also carried out. Results show that the section size and boundary condition of the member have a significant influence on stiffness degradation and energy dissipation capacity. Based on the above, the appropriate material constitutive relationship and analysis method of H-section aluminum alloy members under cyclic loading are determined, providing a reference for the seismic design of aluminum alloy structures.

키워드

과제정보

This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51778016) and Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, China (grant number 8182006).

참고문헌

  1. Aluminum Association (1976), Specification for Aluminum Structures, Washington, USA.
  2. Chang, Y., Liu, M. and Wang, P. (2016), "Interacted buckling failure of thin-nailed irregular-shaped aluminum alloy column under axial compression", Thin Wall. Struct., 107, 627-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.07.008.
  3. Chapuis, J. and Galambos, T.V. (1982), "Restrained crooked aluminum columns", J. Struct. Div., 108(3), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005900.
  4. Chen, X. and Zhang, Z. (2019), "Theoretical research on aluminium members under cyclic axial loading", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation (ICCET 2015), 226-229. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccet-15.2015.44.
  5. Clark, J.W. (1955), "Plastic strength of structural members: A symposium: Eccentrically loaded aluminum columns", Tran. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 120(1), 1116-1132. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0007256.
  6. De Matteis, G., Landolfo, R., Manganiello, M. and Mazzolani, F.M. (2004), "Inelastic behaviour of I-shaped aluminium beams: numerical analysis and cross-sectional classification", Comput. Struct., 82(23), 2157-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.071.
  7. ECCS (1978), European Recommendations for Aluminium Alloy Structures, European Convention for Construction Steelwork, Brussels, Belgium.
  8. GB/T 228.1-2010 (2010), Metallic Materials-Tensile Testing-Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature, China.
  9. Guo, X., Liang, S. and Shen, Z. (2015), "Experiment on aluminum alloy members under axial compression", Front. Struct. Civil Eng., 9(1), 48-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0271-9.
  10. Hill, H.N., Hartmann, E.C. and Clark, J.W. (1956), "Design of aluminum alloy beam-columns", Tran. Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 121(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0007323.
  11. Hiyama, Y., Ishikawa, K., Kato, S. and Okubo, S. (2000), "Experiments and analysis of the post-buckling behaviors of aluminum alloy double layer space grids applying ball joints", Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(3), 289-304. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.3.289.
  12. JGJ/T 101-2015 (2015), Specification for Seismic Test of Buildings, China Planning Press, China.
  13. Landolfo, R. and Mazzolani, F.M. (1997), "Different approaches in the design of slender aluminium alloy sections", Thin Wall. Struct., 27(1) 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(96)00015-8.
  14. Liu, H., Chen, Z., Xu, S. and Bu, Y. (2015), "Structural behavior of aluminum reticulated shell structures considering semi-rigid and skin effect", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 121-133. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.1.121.
  15. Liu, H., Ding, Y. and Chen, Z. (2017), "Static stability behavior of aluminium alloy single-layer spherical latticed shell structure with Temcor joints", Thin Wall. Struct., 120, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.09.019.
  16. Liu, M., Chang, Y., Wang, P. and Zhang, L. (2016), "Buckling behaviors of thin-walled aluminum alloy column with irregular-shaped cross section under axial compression in a fire", Thin Wall. Struct., 98, 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.02.008.
  17. Liu, Y., Zhou, L. and Wang, C.L. (2016), "Low-cycle fatigue testing of a novel aluminum alloy buckling-restrained brace", Key Eng. Mater., 710, 345-350. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.710.345
  18. Meng, X.W. and Gao, W.Y. (2002), "Experimental research and application on the aluminium alloy bolted ball joint net frame", Symposium on the 10th National Spatial Structure Symposium, 603-607. (in Chinese)
  19. Su, M.N., Young, B. and Gardner, L. (2014), "Testing and design of aluminum alloy cross sections in compression", J. Struct. Eng., 140(9), 04014047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000972.
  20. Wang, C.L., Usami, T., Funayama, J. and Imase, F. (2013), "Low-cycle fatigue testing of extruded aluminium alloy bucklingrestrained braces", Eng. Struct., 46, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.016.
  21. Wang, Y., Lin, S., Feng, F., Zhai, X. and Qian, H. (2016), "Numerical simulation of aluminum alloy 6082-T6 columns failing by overall buckling", Adv. Struct. Eng., 19(10), 1547- 1574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216643899.
  22. Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Yun, X., Gardner, L. and Hu, X. (2020), "Experimental and numerical study of fixed-ended high-strength aluminum alloy angle-section columns", J. Struct. Eng., 146(10), 04020206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002773.
  23. Wen, S., Liu, H., Chen, Z. and Ying, J. (2020), "Ultimate bearing behavior of H-beam welded hollow spheres under eccentric compression", Eng. Struct., 212, 110-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110522.
  24. Zhou, F. and Young, B. (2019), "Combined bending and web crippling of aluminum SHS members", Steel Compos. Struct., 31(2), 173-185. http://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.2.173.
  25. Zhu, J.H. and Young, B. (2006), "Experimental investigation of aluminium alloy circular hollow section columns", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.012.