Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회지)

The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Characteristics of Smart Platforms by Type of Community Participation

커뮤니티 참여 유형별 스마트 플랫폼 특성 분석

  • Kwang-Woo, NAM (Kyungsung University Department of Urban Planning & Engineering) ;
  • Erlando, Sulistia (Kyungsung University, Department of Construction Environment and Urban Engineering)
  • Received : 2022.11.15
  • Accepted : 2022.12.08
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Digital platforms play crucial roles in terms of enabling and sustaining online communities. However, who really benefits from digital platform development, and what are the benefits digital platforms provide for the development of smart communities. This paper explores this question, the goal was to understand the links between digital platforms and smart communities, using the clustering methodology process to have a better understanding of characteristic of each digital platform, Twenty nine digital platforms is clustered and used as a study case. This paper explores how the categorization of digital platform characteristics encourages participation by a smart community, thus improving information and service delivery. On another side, the rise of digital platforms brings new challenges for policy maker to foster a smart community and firms the digital platform also offer benefits to giving effective and efficient service.

디지털 플랫폼은 온라인 커뮤니티의 운영과 지속가능성에 중요한 역할을 한다. 그러나 디지털 플랫폼 개발의 진정한 혜택은 누구를 위한 것이며 스마트 커뮤니티의 발전을 위해 디지털 플랫폼이 제공하는 혜택은 무엇이 있을까? 본 연구는 이러한 질문에 답하고자 디지털 플랫폼과 스마트 커뮤니티 간의 연관성을 이해하고 군집분석 프로세스를 사용하여 각 디지털 플랫폼의 스마트커뮤니티 지원에 관한 특성을 분석하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 본 연구에는 29개의 디지털 플랫폼이 연구 사례로 활용되었다. 이를 통해 디지털 플랫폼 특성을 구분하여 각 특성에 따른 플랫폼 서비스가 어떻게 스마트 커뮤니티의 참여를 유도하고 정보 및 서비스 제공을 개선해나가는지를 분석하였다. 디지털 플랫폼의 발전은 정책 입안자에게 스마트커뮤니티 육성을 통한 도시 혁신의 새로운 도전과제를 제공하기도 하고 효과적이고 효율적인 서비스 제공 수단으로서의 역할이 강화되고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원 <빅데이터 기반의 AI도시계획기술개발>(과제번호 RS-2022-00143404)의 지원으로 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom, New Haven and London: Yale University Press 2:259-261.
  2. Cantador, I., Bellogin, A., Cediel, M. E., and Gil, O. 2017. Personalized Recommendations in E-Participation: Offline Experiments for the 'Decide Madrid: Platform. International Workshop on Recommender Systems for Citizens:1-6.
  3. Deloitte. 2017. Smart City | Smart Nation. Deloitte:5-43.
  4. Eduardo, F.Z., Ana, P.C., Marco, A.G., Fabio, K., and Dejan, S.M. 2015. Software Platforms for Smart Cities: Concepts, Requirements, Challenges, and a Unified Reference Architecture. ACM Computing Survey:1-34.
  5. Exchange, U. S. 2012. The Sharing City, Seoul Project. Retrieved from Urban Sustainability Exchange: https://use.metropolis.org/casestudies/the-sharing-city-seoul-project
  6. Frankenfield, J. 2021, April 1. Investopedia. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/client-centric.asp#:~:text=Client%2Dcentric%2C%20also%20known%20as,philosophy%2C%20operations%2C%20or%20ideas.
  7. Gawer, A. 2009. Platforms, markets and innovation:19-25.
  8. Gil, O., Cortes-Cediel, M.E., and Cantador, I. 2019. Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research:19-34.
  9. Government Seoul. 2012, September 20. The Sharing City Seoul Project. Retrieved from Seoul Metropolitan Government: http://english.seoul.go.kr/policy/key-policies/city-initiatives/1-sharing-city/
  10. Hastie. R., Tibshirani. R., and Friedman. J. H. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, Prediction. Springer:525-526
  11. Hein A., Schreieck M., Riasanow T. et al., 2020. Digital platform ecosystems. Electron market 30:87-98.
  12. Heo, S.Y., Jang, H.E., and Lee, J.H. 2022 Spatial Pattern and Cluster Analysis of University-Industry Collaboration Competency of Korean University. The Korea Association of Geographic Informations Studies 25(2): 59-71
  13. Heo, S.Y., Moon, T.H. 2012 Analysis of Spatial Crime Pattern and Place Occurrence Characteristics for Building a Safe City. The Korea Association of Geographic Information Studies 15(4):78-89 https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.4.078
  14. Kachigan., Sam, K. 1984. Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Radius Press. Chapter 8 Introduction to Cluster Analysis.
  15. Lee, S.H., Leem, Y.T. 2016 Analyzing Characteristics of the Smart City Governance. The Korea Association of Geographic Information Studies 19(2):86-97 https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2016.19.2.086
  16. Phahlamohlaka J., Dlamni Z., Mnisi T. et al., 2014. Towards a Smart Community Centre: Seidet Digital Village. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing:107-121.
  17. McQueen, J. 1967. Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate observations. Computer and Chemistry, 4:257-272.
  18. Michael, F., Kishore, R., and Drilon S, G. 2018. Smart Cities Funding and Financing in Developing Economies. Deloitte.
  19. Network, Ontario. 2022, April. Ontario Nonprofit Network. Retrieved from https://theonn.ca/topics/policy-priorities/regulatory-environment/shared-platforms/#:~:text=The%20term%20shared%20platform%20is,have%20its%20own%20legal%20status.
  20. NG, S.T., Wong, M.H., and Wong, K.W. 2012. A Public Private People Partnership (P4) Process Framework for Infrastructure Development in HongKong. The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning: 370-381.
  21. Paudyn, B. 2014. Credit ratings and Sovereign Debt: The Political Economy of Creditworthiness through Risk and Uncertainty. Springer:1-29
  22. Paudyn, B. 2017. Financial Engineering Thorugh Risk Uncertainty: The Performative Political Economy of Credit Worthiness and its Self-Generative Effects for Credit Rating Agencies. International Political Sociology.:83-134
  23. Ren, J., Qi, W., Westphal, C., Wang, J., Lu, K., Liu, S., and Wang, S. 2014. Magic: A Distributed MAx-Gain In-Network caching Strategy in Information-Centric Networks. IEEE Confrence on Computer Communication Workshops:470-475 .
  24. Satar, N.M., Saifullah, M.K., Masud, M.M., and Kari, F.B. 2020. Developing Smart Community Based on Information and Communication Technology: an Experience of Kemaman Smart Community, Malaysia. International Journal of Social Economics, 48:349-362.
  25. Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The power of organizing without organization, New York, NY: Penguin Press.
  26. Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., and Lee, G. 2015. A Design Theory for Digital Platforms Supporting Online Communities: a Multiple Case Study. Journal of Information Technology 30:364-380. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.37
  27. Weber, M. 1946. Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University.
  28. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K. 2010. The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21:724-735.
  29. Zuiderwijk, A., and Janssen, M. 2015. Towards Decision Support for Disclosing Data: Closed or Open Data? Information Polity 20:103-117. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-150358