Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Agents

수종의 교정용 브라켓 접착 레진의 전단 강도 평가

  • Youngjun, Ham (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Miran, Han (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 함영준 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 한미란 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2022.04.05
  • Accepted : 2022.05.30
  • Published : 2022.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Due to the development of properties of adhesive materials currently used in dentistry, the bonding ability between the brackets and the tooth enamel has been greatly improved. In general, in situations where cooperation can be obtained, adhesion of the orthodontic bracket through the conventional three-step process can show excellent bonding strength. However, if it is difficult to expect patient cooperation, as in the pediatric dentistry area, or if moisture isolation is not properly performed, the binding strength that does not reach the expected effect. As a result, various products that simplify the process for adhesion are being developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bonding strength between the conventional 3-step adhesion system, self-etching primer system and one-step adhesion system that reduces the priming process. A total of 60 human maxillary, mandibular premolars were prepared. Group I (control group) were followed conventional 3-step bonding process. Group II were conditioned with self-etching primer. Group III were etched with 37% phosphoric acid and brackets were bonded with self-priming adhesive. The resultant shear bond strength of each group was measured and an adhesive remnant index (ARI) was recorded. The mean shear bond strength of group I, II, III were 14.69 MPa, 11.21 MPa and 12.21 MPa respectively. Significant differences could only be found between group I, II and group I, III (p < 0.05). The ARI indicated no significant difference among all groups.

치과에서 사용하는 재료들의 물성의 발달로 인하여 브라켓과 치아 사이의 결합 능력도 크게 향상되었다. 그러나 소아치과 영역에서와 같이 환자의 협조를 기대하기 어렵거나, 수분 격리가 제대로 이루어지지 않을 경우 기대하는 효과에 미치지 못하는 결합강도를 보여 줄 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 세 가지의 접착 술식을 비교하여 브라켓의 전단 접착 강도를 평가하고, 임상적으로 유의한 차이가 존재하는지 비교하는 것이다. 우식증이나 수복물이 없는 상, 하악 소구치 60개 치아를 대상으로 하였다. Group I은 대조군으로서 기존의 3 step 접착 방식에 따라 브라켓을 부착하였고, Group II는 self-etching primer system을 이용하여 부착하였다. Group III는 self-priming adhesive를 이용하여 브라켓을 부착하였다. 각 group의 전단 결합 강도를 측정하고 접착제 잔류지수(ARI)를 기록하였다. 각 group I, II, III의 평균 전단 결합 강도는 14.69 MPa, 11.21 MPa 그리고 12.21 MPa로 측정되었다. Group I과 II, group I과 III에서만 유의한 차이가 존재하였으며(p < 0.05), ARI 값은 모든 group에서 유의한 차이가 존재하지 않았다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The present research was conducted by the research fund of Dankook University in 2021.

References

  1. Reynolds IR : A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod, 2:171-178, 1975.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
  2. Reynolds IR, Von Fraunhofer JA : Direct bonding of orthodontic attatchments to teeth: The relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod, 3:91-95, 1976.  https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.3.2.91
  3. Buonocore MG : A Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34:849-853, 1955.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  4. McCarthy MF, Hondrum SO : Mechanical and bond strength properties of light-cured and chemically cured glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 105:135-141, 1994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70109-1
  5. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM : Contemporary Orthodontics, 3rd ed. Mosby, St. Louis, 2000. 
  6. Retief DH, Sadowsky PL : Clinical experience with the acid-etch technique in orthodontics. Am J Orthod, 68:645-654, 1975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90098-6
  7. Kaban LB, Needleman HL, Hertzberg J : Idiopathic failure of eruption of permanent molar teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 42:155-163, 1976.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(76)90118-3
  8. Nielsen IL, Prydso U, Winkler T : Direct bonding on impacted teeth. Am J Orthod, 68:666-670, 1975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90101-3
  9. Oonsombat C, Bishara SE, Ajlouni R : The effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with the use of a new self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123:547-550, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00049-0
  10. Shin JS, Kim JS : A study of shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket under blood-contaminated conditions. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32:191-199, 2005. 
  11. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ : Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119:621-624, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113269
  12. Bhattacharjee D, Sharma K, Sahu R, Neha K, Kumari A, Rai A : Comparative Evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with self etch primer/adhesive and conventional etch/primer and adhesive system. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 13(Suppl 2):S1168-S1173, 2021. 
  13. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ : Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod, 76:123-126, 2006. 
  14. Moninuola AE, Da Costa OO, Isiekwe MC : A review of orthodontic bond failure using a chemical cure adhesive. Odontostomatol Trop, 33:35-40, 2010. 
  15. Hadrous R, Bouserhal J, Osman E : Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study. Int Orthod, 17:461-468, 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.006
  16. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D : Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent, 26:609-616, 1998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00046-8
  17. Ok U, Aksakalli S, Eren E, Kechagia N : Single-component orthodontic adhesives: comparison of the clinical and in vitro performance. Clin Oral Investig, 25:3987-3999, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03729-z
  18. Shapinko Y, Eleftheriadi I, Brosh T, Adler-Abramovich L, Davidovitch M, Sella-Tunis T, Sarig R, Shpack N : Evaluation of an orthodontic adhesive with combined primer and composite. Open J Stomatol, 8:205-216, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2018.86020
  19. Artun J, Bergland S : Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod, 85:333-340, 1984.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
  20. Coreil MN, Mclnnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R : Shear bond strength of four orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97:126-129, 1990.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70085-Q
  21. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D : Effects of self-etching primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets at different debond times. Angle Orthod, 77:108-112, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.2319/011606-22R.1
  22. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo Jr PT : Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of clearfil liner bond 2. Am J Dent, 8:289-293, 1995. 
  23. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K : Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater, 14:99-105, 1998. 
  24. Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K : Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod, 72:558-564, 2002. 
  25. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ : Self-etching primers - an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop, 62:238-245, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001931
  26. Meehan MP, Foley TF, Mamandras AH : A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115:125-132, 1999.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70338-0
  27. Retief DH : Failure at the dental adhesive - etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil, 1:265-284, 1974.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1974.tb01438.x
  28. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR : Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114:80-87, 1998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70242-2
  29. Rotta M, Bresciani P, Moura SK, Grande RHM, Hilgert LA, Baratieri LN, Loguercio AD, Reis A : Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent, 9:537-545, 2007. 
  30. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Mussig D : A comparative evaluation of bracket bonding with 1-, 2-, and 3-component adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132:144.E1-144.E5, 2007. 
  31. Ahmed T, Rahman NA, Alam MK : Assessment of in vivo bond strength studies of the orthodontic bracket-adhesive system: A systematic review. Eur J Dent, 12:602-609, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_22_18
  32. Tanaka E, Watanabe M, Nagaoka K, Yamaguchi K, Tanne K : Orthodontic traction of an impacted maxillary central incisor. J Clin Orthod, 35:375-378, 2001. 
  33. Cuoghi OA, Bertoz FA, De Mendonca MR, Santos EC, An TL : Extrusion and alignment of an impacted tooth using removable appliances. J Clin Orthod, 36:379-383, 2002. 
  34. Arhun N, Arman A, Sesen C, Karabulut E, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S : Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with 3 self-etch adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129:547-550, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.006