PNF and Movement

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.359-370
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2508-6227(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6472(eISSN)
대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회 (Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

ICF 모델 기반 신경계 환자 물리치료 평가 도구 사용 조사

Evaluation Tools for Patients with Neurologic Disorders Based on the ICF Model: A Survey of Korean Physical Therapists

  • 이지아 (전주대학교 일반 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 우영근 (전주대학교 일반 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 원종임 (전주대학교 일반 대학원 재활과학과) ;
  • 김수진 (전주대학교 일반 대학원 재활과학과)
  • Lee, Ji-ah (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Jeonju University) ;
  • Woo, Yong-Keun (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Jeonju University) ;
  • Won, Jong-Im (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Jeonju University) ;
  • Kim, Su-jin (Dept. of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Jeonju University)
  • 투고 : 2022.09.23
  • 심사 : 2022.10.20
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Physical therapists are required to properly choose the most appropriate treatment for each patient within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF model). The aims of this study were to determine whether neurological physical therapists in clinical settings in South Korea know about the ICF model and to investigate the current trends of outcome measures (OMs) used by them. Methods: Two hundred and one physical therapists who worked with patients with neurological disorders participated in this study. The survey was conducted via e-mail and asked about commonly used OMs and the considerations for selecting OMs. Results: All physical therapists involved in this study responded completely, and 45.8% of participants learned about the ICF model, while 37.3% understood the detailed information related to the ICF model. The rest of the participants did not know or just heard about the ICF model. The most frequently used tools at the body function/structure level were the Range of Motion (98%), Manual Muscle Test (97%), Berg Balance Scale (83.1%), and Modified Ashworth Scale (70.6%) when allowing repetition. At the activity level, the 10-meter walk test (71.1%), 6-minute walk test (54.2%), and Functional Ambulatory Category (43.3%) were used, while the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (23.9%) was used at the participation level. There was a positive relationship between the number of tools used and years of work, as well as the level of understanding of the ICF model. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that it is necessary to learn the ICF model in a clinical setting. In addition, the medical system needs to be modified to encourage physical therapists in South Korea to use proper OMs within the ICF model.

키워드

과제정보

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (No. NRF-2021R1F1A1045506)

참고문헌

  1. Atkinson HL, Nixon-Cave K. A Tool for clinical reasoning and reflection using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework and patient management model. Physical Therapy. 2011;91(3):416-430. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090226
  2. Bang YS, Kim HY. Clinical application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health tools in occupational therapy. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2010;18(4):39-50.
  3. Escorpizo R, Bemis-Dougherty A. Introduction to special issue: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and physical therapy over the years. Physiotherapy Research International. 2015;20(4):200-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1578
  4. Franki I, Desloovere K, De Cat J, et al. The evidence-base for basic physical therapy techniques tar geting lower limb function in children with cerebral palsy : a systematic review using the International Clasification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a conceptual framework. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2012;44(5):385-395. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0983
  5. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2001;33(6):273-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701753236464
  6. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Canada. 2004;56(03):171. https://doi.org/10.2310/6640.2004.00017
  7. Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Mead J, et al. Outcome measures measure outcomes, not effects of intervention. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2005;51(1):3-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70047-7
  8. Jang HY. Perception and use of balance measures for stroke patients among physical therapists in South Korea. Sahmyook University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2014.
  9. Jette AM, Haley S. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005;37(6):339-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970500302793
  10. Kang TW, No HJ. A Case report of progressive intervention strategy applied ICF tool about gait for TBI patient. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2012;7(2):137-147. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2012.7.2.137
  11. Lee J, Kim J. The Coordinative locomotor training intervention strategy using the ICF Tool to Improve the standing posture in scoliosis: A case report. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2021;33(1):7-15. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2021.33.1.7
  12. Lee SH, Hong CR, Park HY. Current trend in use of occupational therapy assessment tool by pediatric occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Society of Sensory Integration Therapists. 2018;16(3):23-33. https://doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2018.16.3.023
  13. Lee SJ, Kim HJ, Kam KY. Trends in the use of occupational therapy evaluation tools for special education students in school environment. The Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 2019;23(1):75-89. https://doi.org/10.34262/kadd.2019.23.1.75
  14. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensationg" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):313-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308328727
  15. Moore JL, Potter K, Blankshain K, et al. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation. In Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy(Vol. 42). 2018.
  16. Ozipek M, Arikan H, Calik-Kutukcu E, et al. Deviations of body functions and structure, activity limitations, and participation restrictions of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model in children with cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020;55:1207-1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24708
  17. Park H, Yi C, Cho S, et al. Physical therapist's understanding and the usage of assessment tools for children with delayed development and cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy Korea. 2000;7(1):1-21.
  18. Potter K, Fulk GD, Salem Y, et al. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part I. making sound decisions. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 2011;35(2):57-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e318219a51a
  19. Stephenson JL, De Serres SJ, Lamontagne A. The effect of arm movements on the lower limb during gait after a stroke. Gait & Posture. 2010;31(1):109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.008
  20. Sullivan JE, Andrews AW, Lanzino D, et al. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part II. a patient-centered process. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 2011;35(2):65-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a24eb
  21. Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Physical Therapy. 2013;93(10):1383-1396. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120492
  22. Thier SO. Forces motivating the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings and related clinical research. Medical Care. 1992.
  23. Yoo EY, Jung MY, Park SY, et al. Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by korean occupational therapist. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. 2006;14(3):27-37.
  24. Werner AS, Liliane R, Erika H, et al. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy. 2002;82(11):1098-1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.11.1098
  25. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2001.