DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Adult Lung CT Image for Ultra-Low-Dose CT Using Deep Learning Based Reconstruction

  • JO, Jun-Ho (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • MIN, Hyo-June (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • JEON, Kwang-Ho (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • KIM, Yu-Jin (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • LEE, Sang-Hyeok (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • KIM, Mi-Sung (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • JEON, Pil-Hyun (Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital) ;
  • KIM, Daehong (Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University) ;
  • BAEK, Cheol-Ha (Department of Radiological Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • LEE, Hakjae (ARALE laboratory Inc.)
  • Received : 2021.08.31
  • Accepted : 2021.12.05
  • Published : 2021.12.30

Abstract

Although CT has an advantage in describing the three-dimensional anatomical structure of the human body, it also has a disadvantage in that high doses are exposed to the patient. Recently, a deep learning-based image reconstruction method has been used to reduce patient dose. The purpose of this study is to analyze the dose reduction and image quality improvement of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on the adult's chest CT examination. Adult lung phantom was used for image acquisition and analysis. Lung phantom was scanned at ultra-low-dose (ULD), low-dose (LD), and standard dose (SD) modes, and images were reconstructed using FBP (Filtered back projection), IR (Iterative reconstruction), DLR (Deep learning reconstruction) algorithms. Image quality variations with respect to varying imaging doses were evaluated using noise and SNR. At ULD mode, the noise of the DLR image was reduced by 62.42% compared to the FBP image, and at SD mode, the SNR of the DLR image was increased by 159.60% compared to the SNR of the FBP image. Based on this study, it is anticipated that the DLR will not only substantially reduce the chest CT dose but also drastic improvement of the image quality.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This Work was Supported by Eulji University in 2021.

References

  1. Brenner, D. J. & Hall, E. J. (2007). Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure, The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 2277-2284. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149
  2. Kim, H. -J. Cho, J. -H. & Park, C. -S. (2010). Evaluation of image quality in low tube-voltage chest CT scan, Journal of Radiation Protection, 35(4), 135-141.
  3. Kim, I., Kang, H., Yoon, H. J., Chung, B. M., & Shin, N.-Y . (2021). Deep learning-based image reconstruction for brain CT: improved image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V). Diagnostic Neuroradiology, 63(1), 905-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02574-x
  4. Fanous, R., Kashani, H., Jimenez, L., Murphy, G., & Paul, N. S. (2012). Image quality and radiation dose of pulmonary CT angiography, American Journal of Roentgenology, 199(5), 990-996. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8208
  5. Higaki, T., Nakamura, Y., Zhou, J., Yu, Z., Nemoto, T., Tatsugami, F., & Awai, K. (2020). Deep learning reconstruction at CT: Phantom study of the image characteristics. Academic Radiology, 27(1), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.008
  6. Lee, K. B., & Goo, H. W. (2018). Quantitative image quality and histogram-based evaluations of an iterative reconstruction algorithm at low-to-ultralow radiation dose levels: A phantom study in chest CT, Korean Journal of Radiology, 19(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.1.119
  7. Lee, Y. -H. & Koo, D. -H. (2017). A study on development deep learning based learning system for enhancing the data analytical thinking, Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.4.393
  8. Willemink, M. J. & Noel, P. B. (2019). The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence, European Radiology, 29(5), 2186-2191.