DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current Status and Issues in Digital Trade Agreements: Focusing on Cross-border Data Flows and Data Protection

디지털 통상의 국제규범화 현황과 쟁점: 국경 간 데이터 이동 및 데이터 보호를 중심으로

  • Joo Hyoung Lee (International Affairs Bureau, National Court Administration, Supreme Court) ;
  • Jeongmeen Suh (Soongsil University, Department of Global Commerce) ;
  • Jaeyoun Roh (Yeungnam Univeristy, School of International Economics & Business)
  • Received : 2021.04.10
  • Accepted : 2021.06.28
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

Korea's FTA e-commerce regulations are evolving into a standardized norm. However, "location of computing facilities", which was not covered by Korea's existing FTA, was newly established in Korea's first Mega FTA, RCEP. China, a member of RCEP, restricts data movement and requires data localization through its Cybersecurity law. These facts have led to start this study with interest in data-related regulations. It examined country-specific and regulatory characteristics in the process of forming digital trade norms, using the TAPED established by Burri et al. (2020). It also analyzed the current status of introducing norms related to 'data flow', 'data localization' and 'data protection' of the EU, USA and China, which are leading the formation of e-commerce trade norms. Finally, the legal review was conducted to compare the exact meaning of the wording expressed in each agreement for the six recently enacted Mega FTAs and Digital Economic Agreements. These findings are meaningful in that they provided implications for the effectiveness of RCEP and the direction of negotiations on Korea's digital trade norms.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the 2021 Yeungnam University Research Grant.

References

  1. Burri, M. and R. Polanco (2020), "Digital Trade Probision in Preferntial Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Dataset", Journal of International Economic Law, 23(1), pp187-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz044
  2. Burri, M. (2020), "Data Flows and Global Trade Law: Tracing Developments in Preferential Trade Agreements", Forthcoming in Big Data and Global Trade Law, Cambridge Unviersity Press.
  3. Kim Ho-Cheol (2020), "A Study of New Trade Rules in the USMCA", International Trade Law 147, pp158-1990.
  4. Kim Nam-Jong (2021), "Global Trend and Challenges for Data Localization in Digital Trade", Finance Brief, 30(2), pp14-16.
  5. Kim Seung-Min (2017), "New Trade Rules to Limit Internet Restrictions: With Special Attention to Cross-Border Data Flow and Data-Lacolization of TPP Agreement", The Korean Journal of International Law, 62(2), pp11-54.
  6. Lee Jae-Min (2020), "Systemic Mismatches between Digital Trade and Conventioanl Trade Agreements - Cotroversies over Regulation of Personal Information and Security Exceptions", The Korean Journal of International Law, 65(2), pp227-262. https://doi.org/10.46406/kjil.2020.06.65.2.227
  7. Lee Jae-Young (2020), "A Study on the Main Issues of Digital Trade Rules", The e-Business Studies, 21(3), pp107-121. https://doi.org/10.20462/TeBS.2020.06.21.3.107
  8. Lee Jong-Seok (2019), "The Reasons Why the Establishment of Global Digital Trade Rule has been delayed and the Implications on Korean Digital Trade Policy", Korea Logistics Revew, 29(1), pp63-80.
  9. Min Han-Bit (2020), "Digital Trade and Trade Norms: Analysis on the Data Trade Norms of USMCA", Law Review, 63, pp169-496.
  10. Monteriro, J. and R. Teh (2017), "Provisions on Electronic Commerce in Regional Trade Agreements", WTO Working Paper ERSD-2017-11.
  11. Park Noh-Young and Chung Myung-Hyun (2018), "Digital Trade and The Development of International Law", The Korean Journal of International Law, 63(4), pp197-216.
  12. Park Young-Hun (2020), "Discussion Trend of Global Digital Trade Norm and Positions of Major Countries", Global Market Report 20-003.
  13. Park Whon-Il (2017), "The Merits and Demerits of Data Localization", Kyung Hee Law Journal, 52(4), pp129-164. https://doi.org/10.15539/KHLJ.52.4.6
  14. Suh Jeong-Meen and Roh Jae-Youn (2021), "Classifying Trade Rules on e-Commerce in Korea's FTA", International Commerce and Information Reveiw, 23(1), pp203-208.