한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고등학생의 남자 가정과교사 인식에 관한 주관성 연구

A Subjectivity on High School Students' Perception of Male Home Economics Teachers

  • 전미경 (동국대학교 가정교육과)
  • Jun, Mikyung (Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.28
  • 심사 : 2021.09.14
  • 발행 : 2021.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 남자 가정과교사에 대한 고등학생들의 인식이 어떻게 유형화 되며 인식의 각 유형은 어떤 특성이 있는지를 살펴보는 것이다. 이를 위해 연구참여자가 스스로 자신들의 의견과 의미를 만들어가는 자결적 주관성 연구에 탁월한 Q방법론을 활용하였다. 연구의 진행은 Q방법론의 일반적 절차를 따랐다. 먼저 Q모집단에서 Q표본 즉 남자 가정과교사에 대한 고등학생의 표상체계로 구성된 40개 진술문을 확정하였고, 고등학교 3학년 31명으로 구성된 P표본에 의해 진술문을 Q분류하였고, QUANL 프로그램을 이용해 분석하였다. 그 결과 남자 가정과교사에 대한 고등학생의 인식유형은 4개로 도출되었고 구체적 특성은 다음과 같다. 먼저 유형 1은 '개인 특성 중시형'으로, 남자 가정과교사의 '남자'라는 성과 담당 교과인 ｢가정｣은 교사의 개인적 특성일 뿐이라는 인식특성을 드러냈다. 유형 2는 '교과 중시형'으로, 남자 가정과교사를 ｢가정｣이라는 교과를 중심으로 인식하는 특성이 있다. 유형 3은 '역량 중시형'으로, 남자 가정과교사는 가정교과를 가르치기에 충분한 실력과 역량을 갖춘 교사라는 인식적 특성을 보인다. 유형 4는 '인성 중시형'으로, 남자 가정과교사는 가정이라는 교과에 도전한 멋진 교사라는, 교사의 인성적 특성을 중시하는 모습을 나타냈다. 이 연구는 점점 증가하는 남자 가정과교사에 대한 학생들의 인식을 개인의 맥락에서 심도 있게 이해하는 기초자료로 의미가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to examine high school students' perception of male home economics teachers and identify diverse viewpoints. To this end, the Q method was used, which is useful for operant subjectivity studies in which research participants create their own opinions and viewpoints. Based on the general procedures of the Q method, this study finalized 40 statements comprised of the representational system of high school students on male home economics teachers, which are Q samples, from the Q population. The statements were Q-sorted by P samples comprised of 31 high school seniors and analyzed using the QUANL program. The results showed that there were 4 different viewpoints of high school students on male home economics teachers. The type 1 focused on individual traits, claiming that the 'male' gender of home economics teachers and the 'home economics' subject are merely individual traits of the teachers. The type 2 focused on the subject, perceiving male home economics teachers with focus on the subject of home economics. The type 3 focused on competencies, thinking that male home economics teachers have sufficient skills and competencies to teach home economics. Finally, the type 4 focused on character, valuing the character of the teachers and thinking that male home economics teachers are great teachers who took up the challenge of teaching home economics. This study has significance as it provides the basic data for in-depth understanding of students' perception of male home economics teachers in individual context.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년도 동국대학교 연구년 지원에 의하여 이루어졌음.

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, J. H., & Park, M. J. (2020). A narrative inquiry of the identities of male home economics teachers. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(2), 159-178. doi: 10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.159
  2. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). 가정과교육론 (제2판) [Instruction to home economics education]. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  3. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Heo, Y. S. (2013). 가정과 수업 방법과 수업실연 (제3판) [Teaching method and public presentation of home economics]. Paju: Kyomunsa.
  4. Cho, G. H. (2016, November 8). Being a good husband requires a male mentor (멋진 남편 되는 법, 남자가 가르쳐야 제격). Donga Ilbo. Retrieved from https://www.donga.com/news/article/all/20161108/81215020/1
  5. Cho, H. J. (2001). Gender stereotype: Why not disappear? Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 6(3), 107-125.
  6. Cho, S. H., & Park, H. S. (2019). A study on changes in parents' recognitions of male early childhood teachers in educational institutions for young children. The Korea Association of Child and Education, 2(2), 43-60.
  7. Choi, J. H., & Lim, W. S. (2012). A comparative study on parents' and female teachers' perceptions of male teachers in early childhood education and care centers. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 33(2), 165-183. doi: 10.5723/KJCS.2012.33.2.165
  8. Choi, Y. C. (2003). Male teacher in early childhood education. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 8(3), 25-43.
  9. Choo, K. S., & Sin, J. H. (2015). A study on elementary school teachers' perception of curriculum integration and types of restructuring. Teacher Education Research, 54(1), 120-137. doi: 10.15812/ter.54.1.201503.120
  10. Chun, B. H. (2009). A study on women's employment pattern and expanding women's employment in "nontraditional occupations" in Korea: With specific reference to occupations of aviation. Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea, 7(1), 143-160.
  11. Chung, O. B. (1998). 청년발달의 이해 [Understanding Adolescence Development]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  12. Gee, S. Y., & Yang, J. W. (2017). Narrative inquiry on the career decision process of females in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Narrative and Educational Research, 5(1), 25-48. doi: 10.25051/jner050102
  13. Gong, D. Y., Jun, M. K., & Lee, S. Y. (2021). A subjectivity on the perception of counselors' self-care. Counseling Psychology Education Welfare, 8(2), 107-123. doi: 10.20496/cpew.2021.8.2.107
  14. Han, D. K. (2020). An exploratory study of the types of perception of education for sustainable development among elementary-school teachers: Q-methodological approach. Social Studies Education, 59(4), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.37561/sse.2020.12.59.4.161
  15. Han, H. (2018). Stories of male pre-service teachers' career design and role expectations as early childhood teachers. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 23(1), 111-136. doi: 10.20437/KOAECE23-1-05
  16. Han, J. H., & Chang, J. Y. (2005). Differences in the individual characteristics and job search behavior among female college seniors who want either male-dominated or female-dominated job. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(3), 585-609.
  17. Hwang, B. G. (2015, February 10). A Kyungnam University male graduate passed home economics teacher appointment (경남대 남자 졸업생, 가정과 교사임용 시험 합격). Yonhap News. Retrieved from https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20150210147700052?input=1195m
  18. Jin, J. A., & Lee, W. H. (2019). A study on the recognition type of parent role: Q methodology. Journal of Holistic Education, 23(1), 155-172. doi: 10.35184/kshce.2018.23.1.155
  19. Joo, B. K., & Kim, N. H. (2011). Exploring male preservice teachers' difficulties and the effective ways of support for male preservice teachers in early childhood teacher education program. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 15(1), 485-508.
  20. Jun, M. K. (2004). Analysis of household textbooks for middle high school in colonial age. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 16(3), 1-25.
  21. Jun, M. K. (2005). A study of home economics textbooks in 1900-1910's: An analysis of 「hanmun gajeonghak」, 「sinpyeongajeonghak」 and 「sinjeong gajeonghak」 published by 'Hyun Kong-ryeom'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 17(1), 131-151.
  22. Kil, B. O., Lee, S., Lee, S. Y., & Chung, H. J. (2020). Q 방법론의 이해와 적용 [Theory and application of Q-methodology]. Daejeon: Chungnam National University Press.
  23. Kim, A. L. (2020). A subjectivity study on the recognition types of child welfare. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  24. Kim, B. M., & Kim, M. J. (2013). Analysis of the types of images early childhood teachers have about kindergarten teachers: Employing Q-methodological approach. Journal of Korean Child Care and Education, 9(2), 239-262.
  25. Kim, D. W. (2013). A study on adaptation and turnover of novice male kindergarten teachers. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 17(1), 339-365.
  26. Kim, E. J., & Lee, S. H. (2020). Perception types of value of children for elementary school and middle & high school parents. Journal of KSSSS, 52, 87-107. doi: 10.18346/KSSSS.52.5
  27. Kim, H. J. (2015). Perception pattern of grandparenting in double-income families on the adult children perspective: By using Q methodology. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 46(1), 135-163. doi: 10.16999/kasws.2015.46.1.135
  28. Kim, H. K. (1992). Q methodology for subjective research. The Seoul Journal of Nursing, 6(1), 1-12.
  29. Kim, H. K. (2008a). Q 방법론 [Q method]. Seoul: Communicationbooks.
  30. Kim, H. K. (2008b). Agreement between the Q-block and the Q-tool. Journal of KSSSS, 16, 5-16.
  31. Kim, H. K., & Cha, C. Y. (2008). Preference factors in the materials of television life-information program. Journal of KSSSS, 17, 157-178. https://doi.org/10.5369/JSST.2008.17.3.157
  32. Kim, H. K., & Kim, U. R. (1998). Understanding of TV news audience. Journal of KSSSS, 3, 5-36.
  33. Kim, H. S., & Won, W. M. (2000). Q 방법론 [Q method]. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  34. Kim, J. O. (2018, March 6). A Dongguk university gyeongju campus male graduate ... appointed as a home economics teacher (동국대 경주캠퍼스 "남자 졸업생...가정과 교사 임용). Kyongbuk Ilbo. Retrieved from http://www.kbsm.net/default/index_view_page.php?idx=199834&part_idx=237
  35. Kim, M. A., Nam, S. H., Park, E. S., & Park, E. A. (2014). The type of rearing attitudes of fathers with preschool children: Q methodological approach. Health and Social Welfare Review, 34(1), 328-352. doi: 10.15709/hswr.2014.34.1.328
  36. Kim, S. E. (2016). Q 방법론과 사회과학 제2판 [Q method & sociology]. Seoul: CM Press.
  37. Kim, S. J. (2008). A study on gender differences of gender-role stereotype among youth. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 36, 129-149. doi: 10.16999/kasws.2008..36.129
  38. Kim, S. U., & Lee, D. K. (2015). Male teachers in early childhood education institution: How female teachers them. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 20(2), 419-452.
  39. Kim, W. K. (2018). An exploration on university students' motivation types of participation to cultural physical education: Using Q-methodology. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(16), 85-105. doi: 10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.16.85
  40. Kim, W. S., & Kim, S. H. (2003). The occupational stereotype of high school students and undergraduate students. The Korean Journal of Youth Counseling, 11(2), 11-22.
  41. Kim, W. Y., & Kim, S. R. (2016). The analysis on the early childhood pre-service teachers' image on educational service activities by Q-methodology. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(1), 123-142. doi: 10.22143/HSS21.7.1.7
  42. Kim, Y. S., & Lim, S. M. (2011). A study on the career decision-making process of female undergraduates who want the male-dominated job: A grounded theory based approach. Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 16(3), 303-329. doi: 10.18205/kpa.2011.16.3.004
  43. Kwon, M. H., Kim, B. H., & Kim, Y. J. (2009). Subjectivity about satisfaction of life in middle-aged single women. Journal of KSSSS, 18, 101-123.
  44. Kwon, Y. K. (2010). An analysis on elementary school teachers' types of perception about multicultural education. Journal of Education for International Understanding, 5(2), 38-77.
  45. Kwon, Y., Lee, Y., Lim, Y., Park, Y., Lee, E., & Park, S. (2020). Exploring the ways to use maker education in school. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(4), 19-30. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.19
  46. Lee, E. Y., & Park, S. O. (2017). An analysis on awareness type of adult learners of lifelong education with Q methodology. Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(2), 1-29.
  47. Lee, G. J. (2020). The perception of good childcare teachers: A Q-methodological approach. Journal of Korean Coaching Research, 13(1), 113-130. doi: 10.20325/KCA.2020.13.1.113
  48. Lee, S. Y., & Shim, T. E. (2018). A study on the perception types of Korean college students toward international students. Journal of KSSSS, 41, 5-28. doi: 10.18346/KSSSS.41.1
  49. Ok, S. S., & Ryu, K. H. (2013). A study on stress recognition types in the adaptation process of domestic adoptive families. Journal of Family Relations, 18(3), 131-156.
  50. Park, E., Yoo, S. H., & Chung, A. R. (2017). Q-methodology analysis on family relation types amongst immigrant youth. Studies on Korean Youth, 28(1), 67-97. doi: 10.14816/sky.2017.28.1.67
  51. Park, J. H., & Seo, H. A. (2018). A study on the styles of pre-service early childhood teacher's perception of educational practices: Q methodological approach. The Journal of Eco-Early Childhood Education, 17(1), 75-98. doi: 10.30761/ecoece.2018.17.1.75
  52. Park, Y. S., & Kang, K. A. (2020). An analysis of research trends on male early childhood teacher. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 25(5), 73-94. doi: 10.20437/KOAECE25-5-03
  53. Roh, H. J., & Kim, K. C. (2019). Mentoring stories between experienced male kindergarten teacher and pre-service male kindergarten teachers. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 39(3), 31-61. doi: 110.18023/kjece.2019.39.3.002
  54. Santrock, J. W. (2004). Adolescence (9th ed.). (H. J. Kim et al., Trans.). New York: Mc Graw Hill. (Original work published 2002).
  55. Shin, H. J. (2014). The longitudinal effects of parental attachment on the change of adolescent work value. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 21(4), 285-308.
  56. Shin, S. Y., & Kim, S. H. (2017). The perception of good teacher: An application of Q-methodology. Journal of KSSSS, 36, 27-44.
  57. Sohn, S. Y. (2005). Labor experiences and dilemma of highly-educated professional women in Korea. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 21(3), 67-97.
  58. Tak, J. K. (1995). Occupational sex stereotypes among Korean college students: Differences based on sex, sex-role type and culture. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 161-174.
  59. Wang, S. S. (2003). Document research to identify the goals of home economics education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 15(2), 79-99.
  60. Wang, S. S., & Nam, S. J. (2008). Preliminary home economics teachers' image of home economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(4), 205-211.
  61. Wang, S. S., & Ryu, K. H. (2013). A study on the types of unmarried single women based on their subjective perceptions on single life. Korean Association of Human Ecology, 22(6), 615-631. doi: 10.5934/kjhe.2013.22.6.615
  62. Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2014). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. (P. G. Baek, Trans.). London: SAGE. (Original work published 2012).
  63. Yoo, Y. J., Kim, H. J., Kim, M. Y., Kim, S. G., Kim, Y., Park, J. H.,...Hong, S. J. (2004). 새로운 가족학 [Family science]. Paju: Shinjeong.
  64. You, S. Y., & Jeong, K. S. (2020). Exploring teacher's curriculum interpretation component factors. The Journal of Elementary Education, 33(3), 123-143. doi: 10.29096/JEE.33.3.06