Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the Safety Management Risk Assessment Factors and Indicators for Coastal/Offshore Fishing Vessels

연근해어선의 안전관리 위험성평가 인자 및 지표개발

  • Song, Byung-Hwa (Graduated school of Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Kim, Cheol-Seong (Division of Maritime Transportation, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 송병화 (목포해양대학교 대학원) ;
  • 김철승 (목포해양대학교 해상운송학부)
  • Received : 2021.08.09
  • Accepted : 2021.10.28
  • Published : 2021.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Although the Korean government (Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries) and related organizations are enforcing many policies to improve the marine safety of vessels with weak safety management, the effectiveness of each policy is deficient due to the lack of a risk assessment method for ship safety management. Most previous studies in Korea of the risk assessment of ships only dealt with fragmentary risks of individual marine accident risks, so a new assessment method for comprehensive marine accident risk is needed. Examples of comprehensive risk assessments for ship safety management are the selection method for inspection targets by the Port State Control and the Norwegian Maritime Authority. In this study, indicators for the comprehensive risk assessment of ship safety management were developed for and applied to coastal/offshore fishing vessels that occupy a high proportion of the registrations and marine accidents in Korea. As a result, the risk of each ship was confirmed quantitatively, and a ranking of the weakness factors for ship safety management was identified.

정부(해양수산부) 및 관계기관에서는 안전관리 취약선박의 해양안전 증진을 위한 많은 정책을 시행하고 있으나, 선박의 안전관리에 대한 위험성평가 부재로 각 제도의 효과성에 다소 아쉬움이 확인되었다. 선박의 위험성평가에 대한 국내 선행연구는 대부분 개별적 해양사고 위험성에 대한 단편적 위험성만을 취급하고 있어 포괄적 해양사고 위험성평가를 위한 새로운 방식이 필요하다. 선박의 안전관리에 대한 포괄적 위험성평가 적용사례로 항만국통제와 노르웨이 해사국의 점검대상 선정방법이 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 해양사고 및 등록현황의 높은 비중을 차지하고 있는 연근해어선을 대상으로 포괄적 선박안전관리 위험성평가를 위한 지표를 개발하고 적용하였다. 그 결과, 각 선박별 위험성을 계량적 수치로 확인하였고, 개별적 안전관리 취약요소의 순위를 식별하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, J. Y.(2010), Risk Evaluation of Marine Accidents by Navigation Officers' Fatigue, A Master's thesis of Graduate School of Mokpo National Maritime University.
  2. Kim, C. H.(2014), A Study on the Preparedness of Port State Control for the Enforcement of NIR, The Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol 38, No 2, P.141-146. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2014.38.2.141
  3. Kim, H. Y.(2013), Assessment on the Importance of Evaluation Factors for Ship's Safety Management Company by the AHP, The Journal of Ocean Policy Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 83-108. https://doi.org/10.35372/kmiopr.2013.28.1.004
  4. Kim, J. S., J. M. Park, and C. H. Jung(2018), The Development of the Anchor Dragging Risk Assessment Program, The Journal of The Korea Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 646-653. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.6.646
  5. Kim, K. I., J. S. Jeong, C. S. Kim, and G. K. Park(2010), A Study on the Selection of the risk of the vessel, Proceedings of The Korea Society of Marine Environment & Safety 2010 Autumn Conference, pp. 97-99.
  6. KST(2017), Korea Ship Safety Technology Authority, Operation Plan for 2017 Care Ship Program.
  7. Lee, K. D.(2018), A Study on the risk assessment of marine accidents, The Journal of Korea Ship Safety Technology Authority, Vol. 41, pp. 54-70.
  8. MOF(2013), Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, New Inspection Regime: NIR.
  9. MOF(2017), Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, 2nd National Basic Plan for Maritime Safety.
  10. MOF(2021a), Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, https://www.mof.go.kr/statPortal/cate/statView.do (Accessed: March, 2021).
  11. MOF(2021b), Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries, https://www.mof.go.kr/statPortal/main/portalMain.do (Accessed: March, 2021).
  12. Song, B. H., Y. W. Lee, H. J. Jang, and K. H. Lee(2018), A Study on the improvement of small ship inspection procedures and regulations, The Journal of Korea Ship Safety Technology Authority, Vol. 41, pp. 85-97.