DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Electrochemical Corrosion Damage Characteristics of Austenite Stainless Steel and Nickel Alloy with Various Seawater Concentrations

오스테나이트계 스테인리스강과 니켈합금의 해수 농도 변화에 따른 전기화학적 부식 손상 특성

  • Heo, Ho-Seong (Graduate school, Mokpo national maritime university) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Jong (Division of marine engineering, Mokpo national maritime university)
  • 허호성 (목포해양대학교 대학원) ;
  • 김성종 (목포해양대학교 기관시스템공학부)
  • Received : 2021.09.23
  • Accepted : 2021.10.08
  • Published : 2021.10.31

Abstract

Due to advancement of the industry, operation of a device in a harsh environment is increasing. Especially, the marine environment contains Cl- ions which causes localized corrosion such as pitting and crevice corrosion of stainless steel and various metals. In this study, electrochemical corrosion behaviors of austenitic stainless steel (STS 316L) and nickel alloy (Inconel 600) with different seawater concentrations (fresh water, seawater, mixed water) were investigated. The STS 316L and Inconel 600 were etched in 10% oxalic acid and composed of an austenitic phase. Results of Tafel analysis in seawater showed that STS 316L and Inconel 600 presented the highest corrosion current densities of 7.75 × 10-4 mA/cm2 and 1.11 × 10-4 mA/cm2 and the most negative pitting potentials of 0.94 V and 1.06 V, respectively. The maximum damage depths and surface damage ratio by pitting corrosion increased with chloride concentration. The STS 316L had higher PREN than Inconel 600. However, the surface damage and weight loss of Inconel 600 were superior to STS 316L. It was difficult to compare the pitting resistance of STS 316L based on Fe and Inconel 600 based on Ni with PREN simply.

Keywords

References

  1. Inamuddin, M. I. Ahamed, M. Luqman, and T. Altalhi, Sustainable Corrosion Inhibitors, Materials Research Foundations, 107, 206, (2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.21741/9781644901496
  2. G. Okamoto, Passive Film of 18-8 Stainless Steel Structure and its Function, Corrosion Science, 13, 471, (1973). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(73)90031-0
  3. F. Mansfeld, R. Tsai, H. Shih, B. Little, R. Ray, and P. Wagner, An Electrochemical and Surface Analytical Study of Stainless Steels and Titanium exposed to Natural Seawater, Corrosion Science, 33, 445 (1992). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(92)90073-C
  4. E. Hanki, P. Byung Hyun, J. Soon-Kwan, K Sung Su, Trend and Prospect of Scrubber Technology for Regulatory on Sulfur Content in Marine Fuel Oil, KIC News, 22, No. 5 (2019). Doi: https://www.cheric.org/PDF/PIC/PC22/PC22-5-0001.pdf
  5. B. Cai, Y. Liu, X. Tian, F. Wang, H. Li, and R. Ji, An experimental Study of Crevice Corrosion Behaviour of 316L Stainless Steel in Artificial Seawater, Corrosion Science, 52, 3235 (2010). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.041
  6. S. S. Xin and M. C. Li, Electrochemical corrosion characteristics of type 316L stainless steel in hot concentrated seawater, Corrosion Science, 81, 96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.12.004
  7. M. K.-Ranjbar, J. Mankowski, and D. D. Macdonald , Pitting corrosion of inconel 600 in high temperature chloride solution under controlled hydrodynamic conditions, CORROSION, 41, 197 (1985). Doi: https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3581991
  8. S. A. Chavez, G. E. Korth, and D. M. Harper, and T. J. Walker, High-temperature tensile and creep data for Inconel 600, 304 stainless steel and SA106B carbon steel, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 148, 351 (1994). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90120-1
  9. Lv Jinlong, L. Tongxiang, W. Chen, Surface enriched molybdenum enhancing the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel, Materials Letters, 171, 38 (2016). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.153
  10. S. X. Lin, W. K. Bao, J. Gao, and J. B. Wang, Intergranular corrosion of austenitic stainless steel, Applied mechanics and materials, 229-231, 14 (2012). Doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.14
  11. H. S. Klapper, N. S. Zadorozne, and R. B. Rebak, Localized corrosion characteristics of nickel alloys: A Review, Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 30, 296, (2017). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-017-0553-z
  12. K. W. Nam, J. E. Paeng, and K. Y. Kim, Immersion Characteristics of STS 316L with Degree of Different Cold Rolling, Journal of Power System Engineering, 24, 90 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.9726/kspse.2020.24.3.090
  13. Y. Zuo, H. Wang, J. Zhao, and J. Xiong, The effects of some anions on metastable pitting of 316L stainless steel, Corrosion science, 44, 13 (2002). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00031-2
  14. C. J. Semino, P. Pedeferri, G. T. Burstein, and T. P. Hoar, The localized corrosion of resistant alloys in chlolride solutions, Corrosion Science, 19, 1069, (1979). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(79)80125-0
  15. S. Esmailzadeha, M. Aliofkhazraeia, and H. Sarlakb, Interpretation of cyclic potentiodynamic polarization test results for study of corrosion behavior of metals: A Review, Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 54, 976 (2018). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207020511805026X
  16. S. Piyamahant, S. Ros, and H. Shima, Simulation for corrosion cracking of cover concrete in reinforced concrete structures, Journal of JSCE, 1, 162 (2013). Doi: https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.1.1_162
  17. N. Makuch, The importance of phase composition for corrosion resistance of borided layers produced on nickel alloys, Materials 2020, 13, 5131 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225131
  18. Dean, John A., Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 12th ed., pp.4 - 94, McGraw-Hill, New York (1979).
  19. M. Iannuzzi, M. Rincon Ortiz, M. Kappes, M. A. Rodriguez, R. M. Carranza, and R. B. Rebak, Selecting corrosion resistant alloys for seawater applications. CORROSION/2014, Research in Progress Symposium (Houston, TX: NACE, 2014).