DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Decontamination Efficiency of Radioactive Wastes Generated during the Production of 201Tl

201Tl의 생산과정에서 발생한 방사성 폐기물의 제염 효율 평가

  • Heo, Jae-Seung (Radiation Safety & Section, Korea Institute Radiological & Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Rok (Radiation Safety & Section, Korea Institute Radiological & Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Gi-Sub (Radiation Safety & Section, Korea Institute Radiological & Medical Sciences) ;
  • Ahn, Yun-jin (Radiation Safety & Section, Korea Institute Radiological & Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Min (Department of Health & Safety Convergence Science, Korea University)
  • 허재승 (한국원자력의학원 방사선안전관리팀) ;
  • 김상록 (한국원자력의학원 방사선안전관리팀) ;
  • 김기섭 (한국원자력의학원 방사선안전관리팀) ;
  • 안윤진 (한국원자력의학원 방사선안전관리팀) ;
  • 김정민 (고려대학교 보건안전융합과학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.24
  • Accepted : 2021.10.04
  • Published : 2021.10.31

Abstract

This study was conducted for the purpose of efficient radioactive waste disposal and management. Experiment was evaluated the decontamination efficiencies of the four types decontamination materials(Water, Alcohol, Decontamination Water, Decontamination Gel) with radioactive wastes generated during radio-pharmaceutical production process at Korea Institute Radiological and Medical Sciences(KIRAMS). The radioactive waste sample used in experiment is a lead plate of the fume hood that was disposed in April, 2019. In the experimental method, radioactive waste was measured before and after decontamination using a HPGe semiconductor detector and Gamma survey meter. The measured values before and after decontamination were evaluated for decontamination efficiency as a percentage. As a result, it was confirmed that a lot of specific activity and surface dose rate was removed from the radioactive wastes. In particular, when decontamination water was used, most of the radioactivity of radioactive wastes was removed. Considering these results, if decontamination water is used in decontamination of radioactive waste, decontamination efficiency equivalent to the disposition criteria can be expected with just one decontamination treatment. In addition, in the case of water and alcohol, only on decontamination was effective in approximately 75% and 95%. Otherwise, when decontamination gel was used, it was confirmed that the largest deviation occurred among all experimental results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Institute of Rradiological and Medical Sciences(KIRAMS), funded by Ministry of Science and ICT(MIST). Republic of Korea(No.50422-2021)

References

  1. Vertes A, Nagy S, Klencsar Z, Lovas RG, Rosch F. Handbook of Nuclear Chemistry. 2nd ed. Netherlands: Springer: Dordrecht; 2011:1904-33.
  2. Hwang S, Kim Y, Lee S. Evaluation of Residual Radioactivity and Dose Rate of a Target Assembly in an IBA Cyclotron. J Radiological Science and Technology. 2016;39(4):643-9. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.4.22
  3. IAEA. Application of the Concepts of Exclusion Exemption and Clearance: SAFETY GUIDE No. RS-G-1.7. VIENNA: IAEA; 2004.
  4. IAEA. Classification of radioactive waste: General Safety Guide GSG-1. VIENNA: IAEA; 2009.
  5. Korea Act. Nuclear Safety Act(Act No. 16575, 27. Aug, 2019., Partial Amendment). 2019a.
  6. Korea Act. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Enforcement decree of the nuclear safety Act(Presidential Decree No. 29521, Feb. 8, 2019). 2019b.
  7. Kim C, Park M, Kim G, Jung H, Jang S. Measurement and Estimation for the Clearance of Radioactive Waste Contaminated with Radioisotopes for Medical Application. Progress in Medical Physics. 2014;25 (1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.14316/pmp.2014.25.1.8
  8. Ruhman N, Grantham V, Martin C. The effectiveness of decontamination products in the nuclear medicine department. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38(4):191-4. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.110.076919
  9. Akchata S, Lavanya K, Shivanand B. Influence of Decontaminating Agents and Swipe Materials on Laboratory Simulated Working Surfaces Wet Spilled with Sodium Pertechnetate. Indian J Nucl Med. 2017;32(3):173-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_1_17
  10. Leonardi NM, Tesan FC, Zubillaga MB, Salgueiro MJ. Radioactivity decontamination of materials commonly used as surfaces in general-purpose radioisotope laboratories. J Nucl Med Technol. 2014;42(4):292-5. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.114.144303
  11. VanHorne-Sealy JD. Evaluating the Efficiency of Decon Gel 1101 for Removal of Cs-137, Co-60, and Eu-154 On Common Commercial Construction Materials [master's thesis]. Oregon: Oregon State University; 2008.
  12. Gurau D, Deju R. The use of chemical gel for decontamination during decommissioning of nuclear facilities. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 2015;106:371-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.08.022
  13. Kim C, Lee S, Jang S, Kim J. Measurement of Specific Radioactivity for Clearance of Waste Contaminated with Re-186 for Medical Application. J Radiological Science and Technology. 2017;40(4):633-8. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.4.14
  14. Heo H. Application of the Surfactant-Enhanced soil washing to crude oil contamination soils in Kuwait [master's thesis]. Busan: Pukyong Nation University; 2015.
  15. Rosen MJ, Kunjappu JT. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 2012: 1-34.
  16. Pinho SP, Macedo EA. Solubility of NaCl, NaBr and KCl in Water, Methanol, Ethanol, and their Mixed Solvents. J Chemical and Engineering Data. 2005; 50(1):29-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/je049922y
  17. Sutton M, Fischer RP, Thoet MM, O'Neill M, Edgington G. Plutonium Decontamination Using CBI DecongelTM 1101 in Highly Contaminated and Unique Areas at LLNL. LLNL-TR-404723. 2008.