한국의류산업학회지 (Fashion & Textile Research Journal)

  • 제23권5호
  • /
  • Pages.611-623
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-2060(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5743(eISSN)
한국의류산업학회 (The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

VR 피팅 애플리케이션의 쇼핑 동기와 텔레프레젠스가 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향

Effects of Shopping Motivation and Telepresence in VR Fitting Room Applications on Consumer Response

  • 최우림 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과) ;
  • 김희윤 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과) ;
  • 박민정 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과)
  • Choi, Woolim (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Hee Yoon (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Minjung (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.28
  • 심사 : 2021.10.29
  • 발행 : 2021.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In the era of COVID-19 and advanced ICT technology, retail technologies such as those that use virtual reality(VR) have been drawing significant attention in the fashion industry. This study investigated the impact of shopping motivation and telepresence on consumer attitude, trust, and behavioral intentions in VR fitting room application environments. An online survey was conducted on female consumers in their 20s and 30s after exploring a VR fitting room application. Overall, 225 responses were used for the analysis. The study demonstrated that usefulness had a significant effect on attitude toward product (ATP) and trust toward app (TTA), while enjoyment had a significant effect on ATP, but did not significantly affect TTA. Telepresence did not significantly affect TTA, but had a significant influence on ATP and behavioral intention. TTA had a significant influence on ATP, and both ATP and TTA had significant effects on behavioral intention. Moreover, the effects of usefulness, enjoyment, and telepresence on ATP, TTA, and behavioral intention were significant, as the self-congruity between consumers and avatars increased. The application of the motivation theory and technology acceptance model offers theoretical perspectives for understanding VR fitting room application users' attitudinal and behavioral responses in mobile shopping environments. In addition, this study provides practical implications to mobile retailers that utilize advanced technologies.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2019학년도 이화여자대학교 대학원 장학금 지원에 의한 논문임. 본 논문은 2016년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2016S1A5A2A03927809).

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Allam, H., Bliemel, M., Spiteri, L., Blustein, J., & Ali-Hassan, H. (2019). Applying a multi-dimensional hedonic concept of intrinsic motivation on social tagging tools - A theoretical model and empirical validation. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 211-222. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.005
  4. Amin, M., Rezaei, S., & Abolghasemi, M. (2014). User satisfaction with mobile websites: the impact of perceived usefulness(PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU) and trust. Nankai Business Review International, 5(3), 258-274. doi:10.1108/NBRI-01-2014-0005
  5. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77-95. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1
  6. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun - Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. doi:10.1086/209376
  7. Badrinarayanan, V., Becerra, E. P., & Madhavaram, S. (2014). Influence of congruity in storeattribute dimensions and self-image on purchase intentions in online stores of multichannel retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(6), 1013-1020. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.002
  8. Bae, S., & Kwon, O. (2018). Impact of presence, spatial ability, and esthetics on the continuance intention of use of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Korea Business Review, 33(4), 355-386. doi:10.23839/kabe.2018.33.4.355
  9. Billewar, S. R., Jadhav, K., Sriram, V. P., Arun, A., Abdul, S. M., Gulati, K., & Bhasin, N. K. K. (2021). The rise of 3D E-Commerce - The online shopping gets real with virtual reality and augmented reality during COVID-19. World Journal of Engineering. doi:10.1108/WJE-06-2021-0338
  10. Bloch, P. H., Sherrell, D. L., & Ridgway, N. M. (1986). Consumer search - An extended framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 119-126. doi:10.1086/209052
  11. Chae, J. M. (2016). The effect of mobile fashion shopping characteristics on consumer's purchase intention - Applying the technology acceptance model. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 18(1), 38-47. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2016.18.1.38
  12. Cheon, Y. R., Choi, W. L., Park, M. J., & Yoo, J. M. (2019). The effects of experiential factors of Virtual Reality (VR) store on perceived information, satisfaction and revisit intention. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 43(5), 682-698. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2019.43.5.682
  13. Cheung, M. F., & To, W. M. (2017). The influence of the propensity to trust on mobile users' attitudes toward in-app advertisements - An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 102-111. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.011
  14. Chi, T. (2018). Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobilecommerce - An extended TAM approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 274-284. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.019
  15. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2002). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  16. Choi, H., & Choi, Y. J. (2011). The impact of smartphone application quality factors on trust and the users' continuance intention according to gender. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 16(4), 151-162. doi:10.9723/jksiis.2011.16.4.151
  17. Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust - Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58(6), 737-758. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7
  18. Davis, F. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
  19. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology - A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  20. Debbabi, S., Daassi, M., & Baile, S. (2010). Effect of online 3D advertising on consumer responses - The mediating role of telepresence. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(9-10), 967-992. doi:10.1080/02672570903498819
  21. Etemad-Sajadi, R., & Ghachem, L. (2015). The impact of hedonic and utilitarian value of online avatars on e-service quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 81-86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.048
  22. Fiore, A.M., Jin, H.-J. and Kim, J. (2005), For fun and profit - Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses towards an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22(8), 669-94. doi:10.1002/mar.20079
  23. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior - An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  24. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence - Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006
  25. Goyette, Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., & Marticotte, F. (2010). e-WOM Scale - Word-of-mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 27(1), 5-23. doi:10.1002/cjas.129
  26. Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance - Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of business research, 62(5), 565-571. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016
  27. Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(2), 91-105. doi:10.1080/07481756.1997.12068926
  28. Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 404-420. doi:10.1086/209123
  29. Hong, S. J., & Han, S. (2020). A study of the effect of shopping experience in Virtual Reality and augmented reality on consumer decision making - Analysis of mediating effect of perceived value. Korea Business Review, 24, 173-187. doi:10.17287/kbr.2020.24.0.173
  30. Huang, Y., Backman, S. J., Backman, K. F., & Moore, D. (2013). Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 36, 490-501. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.009
  31. Hwang, Y., & Kim, D. J. (2007). Customer self-service systems - The effects of perceived Web quality with service contents on enjoyment, anxiety, and e-trust. Decision support systems, 43(3), 746-760. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.12.008
  32. Jones, A. (2017, May 25). 4 reasons why fashion brands are adopting virtual reality. HUFFPOST. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/awane-jones/virtual-reality-fashion_b_10069340.html
  33. Josiam, B. M., & Henry, W. (2014). Eatertainment - Utilitarian and hedonic motivations for patronizing fun experience restaurants. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 144, 187-202. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.287
  34. Kang, H. (2020). Impact of VR on impulsive desire for a destination. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 42, 244-255. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.02.003
  35. Kang, J. W., & Nam, K. Y. (2017). The effect of perceived risk, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use for coffee brand mobile apps on trust and continuance intention - Applying privacy-calculus theory and a technology acceptance model. Journal of Tourism Sciences, 41(4), 79-94. doi:10.17086/JTS.2017.41.4.79.94
  36. Keeling, K., McGoldrick, P., & Beatty, S. (2010). Avatars as salespeople - Communication style, trust, and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 793-800. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.015
  37. Kim, C., Hwang, J. S., & Cho, J. (2015). Relationships among mobile fashion shopping characteristics, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, and purchase intention - Mediating effect of ease of use. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 39(2), 161-174. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.2.161
  38. Kim, H. A. (2019, June 24). [Which 5G content companies were selected by NIPA to enter overseas markets?..30 companies supported.] EDAILY. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.edaily.co.kr/news/read?newsId=02548566622525000&mediaCodeNo=257
  39. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet - An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  40. Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. Y., Mun, J. M., & Johnson, K. K. (2017). Consumer adoption of smart in-store technology - Assessing the predictive value of attitude versus beliefs in the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(1), 26-36. doi:10.1080/17543266.2016.1177737
  41. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2008). Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(2), 45-59. doi:10.1002/dir.20113
  42. Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2019). A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 236-249. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016
  43. Kini, A., & Choobineh, J. (1998). Trust in electronic commerce - Definition and theoretical considerations. In Proceedings of the thirty-first Hawaii International conference on System sciences, 4, 51-61. doi:10.1109/HICSS.1998.655251
  44. Kiper, P., Baba, A., Alhelou, M., Pregnolato, G., Maistrello, L., Agostini, M., & Turolla, A. (2020). Assessment of the cervical spine mobility by immersive and non-immersive virtual reality. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 51. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102397
  45. Kiper, P., Szczudlik, A., Agostini, M., Opara, J., Nowobilski, R., Ventura, L., ... & Turolla, A. (2018). Virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute and chronic stroke - A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(5), 834-842. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.023
  46. Klein, L. R. (2003). Creating virtual product experiences - The role of telepresence. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(1), 41-55. doi:10.1002/dir.10046
  47. Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal, 22(1), 35-48.
  48. Kohler, C. F., Rohm, A. J., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2011). Return on interactivity - The impact of online agents on newcomer adjustment. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 93-108. doi:10.1509/jm.75.2.93
  49. Koo, W., Cho, E., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). Actual and ideal self-congruity affecting consumers' emotional and behavioral responses toward an online store. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 147-153. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2014.03.058
  50. Kwak, B. S., & Lee, J. S. (2017). The effects of application characteristics of foodservice on the application trust and usage intention used TAM. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 29(10), 311-330.
  51. Kwon, S. H., Kim, T. U., & Lee, Y. K. (2003). The roles of customer's perceived value, satisfaction, trust and their relationship with loyalty in internet shopping environment. Korean Management Science Review, 20(1), 149-163.
  52. Kwon, W. S., & Lennon, S. J. (2009). What induces online loyalty? Online versus offline brand images. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 557-564. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.015
  53. Lee, H., Chung, N., & Jung, T. (2015). Examining the cultural differences in acceptance of mobile augmented reality - Comparison of South Korea and Ireland. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, 477-491. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_35
  54. Lowry, P., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., & Roberts, T. (2013). Taking "fun and games" seriously - Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (HMSAM). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(11), 617-671. doi:10.17705/1jais.00347
  55. Lu, S. Y., Shpitalni, M., & Gadh, R. (1999). Virtual and augmented reality technologies for product realization. CIRP Annals, 48(2), 471-495. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63229-6
  56. Martinez-Navarro, J., Bigne, E., Guixeres, J., Alcaniz, M., & Torrecilla, C. (2019). The influence of virtual reality in e-commerce. Journal of Business Research, 100, 475-482. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.054
  57. Mcdowell, M. (2020, March 24). Fashion and beauty brands are taking AR more seriously. VOGUE BUSINESS. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.voguebusiness.com/technology/fashion-beauty-brands-taking-ar-seriously
  58. Merle, A., Senecal, S., & St-Onge, A. (2012). Whether and how virtual try-on influences consumer responses to an apparel web site. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(3), 41-64. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415160302
  59. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6
  60. Na, Y. (2010). A study of the purchase behavior of fashion merchandise for the internet shopping-mall using Extended Technology Acceptance Model(ETAM). The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, 10(3), 27-49.
  61. Niu, M. (2020). Application of intelligent virtual reality technology in clothing virtual wear and color saturation after COVID-19 epidemic situation. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(6), 8943-8951.doi:10.3233/JIFS-189292
  62. Noh, M. J., & Park, H. H. (2011). An effect of the beliefs, perceived enjoyment, and trust on the acceptance about the smart clothing - Moderating effect of price consciousness of the smart clothing. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 20(4), 2473-2497.
  63. O'Brien, H. L. (2010). The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement - The case of online shopping experiences. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 344-352. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.001
  64. Padilla-Melendez, A., del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306-317. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
  65. Park, K. C. (2018, Dec 05) [VR.AR.MR Technology Trend] IITP. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://www.iitp.kr/kr/1/knowledge/periodicalViewA.it
  66. Park, M., & Yoo, J. (2018). Benefits of mass customized products - Moderating role of product involvement and fashion innovativeness. Heliyon, 4(2), e00537. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00537
  67. Peng, Y., & Ke, D. (2015). Consumer trust in 3D virtual worlds and its impact on real world purchase intention. Nankai Business Review International, 6(4), 381-400. doi:10.1108/NBRI-03-2015-0009
  68. Pizzi, G., Scarpi, D., Pichierri, M., & Vannucci, V. (2019). Virtual reality, real reactions? - Comparing consumers' perceptions and shopping orientation across physical and virtual-reality retail stores. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.008
  69. Plotkina, D., & Saurel, H. (2019). Me or just like me? The role of virtual try-on and physical appearance in apparel M-retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 362-377. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.002
  70. Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., & Schreiber, S. (2017). How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers - A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 306-319. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.010
  71. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations - Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  72. Shih, C. F. (1998). Conceptualizing consumer experiences in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32(7/8), 655-663. doi:10.1108/03090569810224056
  73. Shin, S. Y., & Kim, C. J. (2019). The effect of service convenience of mobile app users on consumer confidence and purchase intention - Focusing on the role of mediation and trust in perception value. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 22(1), 23-33. doi:10.17961/jdmr.22.1.201902.23
  74. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior - A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287-300. doi:10.1086/208924
  75. Son, M., Han, K., An, Y., & Kim, S. (2019). A study on the major factors affecting the intention to use the AR virtual fitting system. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(5), 991-1000. doi:10.9728/dcs.2019.20.5.991
  76. Song, K., Fiore, A. M., & Park, J. (2007). Telepresence and fantasy in online apparel shopping experience. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 553-570. doi:10.1108/13612020710824607
  77. Song, S. H. (2018, June 28). [New battlefield for e-commerce logistics "Now it's 'return!' "] CLO. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from http://clomag.co.kr/article/2987
  78. Statista. (2021, September 10). Augmented(AR), virtual reality(VR), and mixed reality (MR) market size 2021-2024. Statista. Retrieved September 17, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/591181/global-augmented-virtual-reality-market-size/
  79. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality - Dimensions of determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  80. Suh, K. S., Kim, H., & Suh, E. K. (2011). What if your avatar looks like you? Dual-congruity perspectives for avatar use. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 711-729. doi:10.2307/23042805
  81. Van Kerrebroeck, H., Brengman, M., & Willems, K. (2017). Escaping the crowd - An experimental study on the impact of a Virtual Reality experience in a shopping mall. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 437-450. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.019
  82. Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., van den Hooff, B., Meents, S., & Merikivi, J. (2012). Understanding users' motivations to engage in virtual worlds - A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 484-495. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.020
  83. Wei, W., Qi, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors experience and behaviors - A presence perspective. Tourism Management, 71, 282-293. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.024
  84. Youm, D. S., & Yu, S. Y. (2013). The effects of UI(user interface) experience on product attitude and purchase intention for smartphones. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(4), 129-137. doi:10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.4.129
  85. Zhao, J., Fang, S., & Jin, P. (2018). Modeling and quantifying user acceptance of personalized business modes based on TAM, trust and attitude. Sustainability, 10(2), 356. doi:10.3390/su10020356