한국지진공학회논문집 (Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)

  • 제25권6호
  • /
  • Pages.267-274
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-525X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1099(eISSN)
한국지진공학회 (Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PSC교량의 부재별 상관관계를 고려한 시스템 지진취약도 분석

Seismic Fragility Analysis of a Bridge System Considering the Correlation of Components of the PSC Bridge

  • 안효준 (인하대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 신수봉 (인하대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이종한 (인하대학교 토목공학과)
  • An, Hyojoon (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Shin, Soobong (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Han (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.19
  • 심사 : 2021.10.08
  • 발행 : 2021.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Seismic fragility analysis of a structure is generally performed for the expected critical component of a structure. The seismic fragility analysis assumes that all the components behave independently in a structural system. A bridge system consists of many inter-connected components. Thus, for an accurate evaluation of the seismic fragility of a bridge, the seismic fragility analysis requires the composition of probabilities considering the correlation between structural components. This study presented a procedure to obtain the seismic fragility curve of a bridge system, considering the correlation between bridge components. Seismic fragility analysis was performed on a PSC bridge that is considered as the central infrastructure. The analysis results showed that the probability of the seismic fragility curve of the bridge system was higher than that of each bridge component.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국토교통부 건설기술연구사업의 연구비지원(21SCIP-B146946-04)에 의해 수행되었습니다.

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Road Bridge and Tunnel Status Report. Sejong, South Korea. c2020.
  2. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Kim SH. Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE. 2000;126(12):1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287)
  3. ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Applied Technology Council. Redwood City, California. c1996.
  4. Kim HS, Song JK. Effect of Near- and Far-Fault Earthquakes for Seismic Fragility Curves of PSC Box Girder Bridges. J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Korea. 2010;14(5):53-64. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.5.053
  5. An H, Lee JH, Shin S. Dynamic Response Evaluation of Bridges Considering Aspect Ratio of Pier in Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions. Appl Sci. 2020;10:6098. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176098.
  6. Wells JE, George LL, Cummings GE. Seismic Safety Margins Research Program; Systems Analysis (Project VIII). NUREG/CR-2015. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Livermore. CA. c1983.
  7. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. J Struct Eng. 2002;128:526-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
  8. Nielson BG, DesRoches R. Seismic fragility nethodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(6):823-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655
  9. Nielson BG, Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Ph.D. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta, Georgia. c2005.
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2020 Road Bridge and Tunnel Status Report. Sejong, South Korea. c2020.
  11. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, MH Scott, Fenves GL, et al. Opensees Command Language Manual. USA. c2007.
  12. Muthukumar S, DesRoches R. A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2006;35(7):811-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557
  13. Shamsabadi A, Yan L. Closed-form force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment-backfill systems. In: Proceedings of the geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics IV. American Society of Civil Engineers. c2008. p. 1-10.
  14. Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 1988;114(8):1804-1825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  15. Kim SJ, Song KI, An H. Seismic Fragility of Bridge Considering Froundation and Soil Structure Interaction. KSMI. 2020;24(6):129-137
  16. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002 Apr;128(4):526-33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  17. HAZUS, Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. Technical Manual. Prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency. c1997.
  18. Stefanidou SP, Kappos AJ. Methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2017;46:73-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2774