Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association (한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지)

The Korea Entertainment Industry Association (한국엔터테인먼트산업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High Performance Work System for Entertainment Business : An Analytic Network Process Approach

엔터테인먼트업의 고성과작업조직 : ANP 기법을 중심으로

  • Kwon, Jung-Eon (Department of Career and Vocational Consulting, Joongbu University)
  • 권정언 (중부대학교 원격대학원 진로직업컨설팅학과)
  • Received : 2021.01.20
  • Accepted : 2021.02.25
  • Published : 2021.02.28
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore a significant HPWS(High Performance Work System) model for the entertainment industry. HPWS is one of the most studied themes for managing human resources as well as a set of practices to elicit employees' commitment to an organization. Recently, the entertainment industry is growing rapidly, but it is difficult for entertainment firms to retain a stable profit unlike the manufacturing industry. This is because the performance of entertainment business tends to rely heavily on the capabilities and synergy of human resources. In order to suggest a systematic way to manage these, this research identified an effective HPWS model for entertainment business and provides a competitive advantage to entertainment firms, using ANP(Analytic Network Process). ANP is a multicriteria decision making technique that allows dependences and feedbacks among decision elements in the hierarchical or network structures in a holistic manner. The pairwise comparison data that prioritized the criteria of HPWS was collected from 28 team leaders in entertainment firms. According to our results, the most critical factor for HPWS in entertainment business is "employee involvement in decision-making." The sub-factors such as "open communication," "distributive decision-making," and "performance-driven reward" have a greater effect. These findings could provide implications for entertainment firms to determine which practices should be taken into account to accomplish HPWS.

본 연구의 목적은 엔터테인먼트 산업에 효과적인 고성과작업조직(high performance work system)을 모색, 제시하는 데 있다. 최근에 엔터테인먼트 산업 자체는 급격하게 성장하고 있으나, 엔터테인먼트 기업은 제조업과 달리 안정적 수익구조를 확보하기 어렵다는 특징이 있다. 엔터테인먼트 기업 및 프로젝트의 성과는 인적자원의 역량과 시너지에 의존하는 경향이 농후하기 때문이다. 이를 관리할 수 있는 체계적인 모델을 마련하고자, 본 연구는 ANP(analytic network process)를 활용하여 엔터테인먼트 기업에 경쟁우위를 제공할 수 있는 고성과작업조직을 제시하였다. 고성과작업조직의 성공적 특성을 평정한 쌍대비교 자료는 엔터테인먼트 기업에 종사하는 28명의 팀장급 리더를 대상으로 수집되었다. 연구 결과, '개발적 지원', '관리적 지원'에 비해 '참여기회 부여'가 가장 높은 중요도를 나타냈다. 구체적인 구성요소별 중요도는, '개방적 의사소통', '분산된 의사결정', '성과에 의한 보상'이 높게 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과에 기초하여 엔터테인먼트 기업에서 고성과작업조직을 성취하는 데 실질적 시사점과 실행의 우선순위를 제언하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 리우위, 권상집(2020). 엔터테인먼트 콘텐츠 기업 텐센트의 성장 전략: 모방형 혁신과 M&A를 중심으로. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 14(3), 1-13.
  2. 권정언(2011). 엔터테인먼트 미디어 기업에서 개인의 창의적 성향이 조직의 창의적 성과에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  3. 김건식(2013). 고성과작업시스템이 기술혁신에 미치는 영향: 혁신분위기와 인적자본의 매개효과를 중심으로. 인사조직연구, 21(1), 65-109.
  4. Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G.(2013). High-Performance Work Systems and Job Control: Consequences for Anxiety, Role Overload, and Turnover Intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699-1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663
  5. Gittell, J. H., Seidner, R., & Wimbush, J.(2010). A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work. Organization Science, 21(2), 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0446
  6. Min, M., Zhu, Y., & Bambacas, M.(2020). The Mediating Effect of Trust on the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Employee Outcomes among Chinese Indigenous Firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 399-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12221
  7. Jo, H., Aryee, S., Hsiung, H. H., & Guest, D.(2020). Fostering Mutual Gains: Explaining the Influence of High-Performance Work Systems and Leadership on Psychological Health and Service Performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 198-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12256
  8. 권정언, 우형록(2019). 인적자원개발론. 서울: 백산출판사.
  9. 손윤근(2011). 고성과작업시스템에 대한 구성원의 인지도가 구성원 조직몰입 및 고객지향 영역초월행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  10. Han, J. H., Kang, S., Oh, I. S., Kehoe, R. R., & Lepak, D. P.(2019). The Goldilocks Effect of Strategic Human Resource Management? Optimizing the Benefits of a High-Performance Work System through the Dual Alignment of Vertical and Horizontal Fit. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1388-1412.
  11. Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P.(2013). Walking the Tightrope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0255
  12. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
  13. 옥지호(2013). 고성과작업시스템과 양면적 성과의 관계에 대한 연구. 대한경영학회지, 26(10), 2583-2607.
  14. Boxall, P., & MacKy, K.(2009). Research and Theory on High-Performance Work Systems: Progressing the High-Involvement Stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00082.x
  15. Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y. M., & Otaye, L. E.(2012). Impact of High-Performance Work Systems on Individual-and Branch-Level Performance: Test of a Multilevel Model of Intermediate Linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025739
  16. Shih, H. A., Chiang, Y. H., & Hsu, C. C.(2010). High Involvement Work System, Work-Family Conflict, and Expatriate Performance - Examining Taiwanese Expatriates in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(11), 2013-2030. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.505101
  17. Lawler, E. E.(1986). High-Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
  18. Bohlander, G. W., & Snell, S.(2009). Managing Human Resources. New York, NY: Cengage Learning.
  19. Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P.(2010). High Performance Work Systems in Emergent Organizations: Implications for Firm Performance. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20342
  20. Zhai, X., & Tian, X.(2019). Do Performance Measures Matter in the Relationship between High-Performance Work System and Organizational Performance?. International Journal of Manpower, 41(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-04-2018-0136
  21. Karadas, G., & Karatepe, O. M.(2019). Unraveling the Black Box: The Linkage between High-Performance Work Systems and Employee Outcomes. Employee Relations, 41(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/er-04-2017-0084
  22. Malik, A. R., Manroop, L., & Patel, P. C.(2019). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Skills Shortage and Firm Performance: The Role of High-Performance Work Systems. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(5), 695-710. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.30
  23. Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Rousseau, D. M., Morris, T., & O'Regan, P.(2017). High-Performance Work Systems in Professional Service Firms: Examining the Practices-Resources-Uses-Performance Linkage. Human Resource Management, 56(2), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21767
  24. Liu, B., Zhou, H., & Hong, F.(2017). Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationships between High Commitment Work System and Public Employees' Voice Behaviours?. Management Review, 29, 62-69.
  25. Qi, F., & Wang, W.(2018). Employee Involvement, Public Service Motivation, and Perceived Organizational Performance: Testing a New Model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 746-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316662531
  26. 표원섭(2018). 엔터테인먼트 경영기획 활성화를 위한 문화마케팅 연구. 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지, 12(2), 207-214.
  27. Saaty, T. L.(1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process: The Organization and Prioritization of Complexity (1st ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
  28. Saaty, T. L.(2013). The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach. Operations Research, 61(5), 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1197
  29. Gorener, A.(2012). Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(11), 194-208.
  30. Voulgaridou, D., Kirytopoulos, K., & Leopoulos, V.(2009). An Analytic Network Process Approach for Sales Forecasting. Operational Research, 9(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0026-2
  31. Sipahi, S., & Timor, M.(2010). The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: An Overview of Applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/02517471080000700